ELLIS & ELLIS

Case [2016] FCCA 964


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

ELLIS & ELLIS [2016] FCCA 964

Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Children – father seeks orders for equal time – mother’s strongly held beliefs as a “born-again Christian – allegations of family violence – whether children should be home-schooled – whether children should be permitted to travel overseas.

FAMILY LAW – Property – ascertaining the asset pool for division – contributions as breadwinner – contributions as homemaker and parent – sub-section 75(2) factors – just and equitable settlement.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.60CA, 60CC, 61DA, 65DAA,75, 79

Cases cited:

Ackerman & Ackerman [2013] FMCAfam 109
Bevan & Bevan (2013) FLC 93-545
KB and TC (2005) FLC 93-224
C and C [1998] FamCA 143
Champness & Hanson (2009) FLC 93-407
NHC & RCH (2004) FLC 93-204
Clauson (1995) FLC 92-595
Clives and Clives (2008) FLC 93-385
C & C (2005) FLC 93-220
Ferraro  (1993) FLC 92-335
Garrett and Garrett (1984) FLC 91-539
Godfrey & Sanders [2007] FamCA 102
Hall & Hall (1979) 5 Fam LR 609; FLC 90-713
Hayne and Hayne (1977) FLC 90-265
Hickey (2003) FLC 93-143
Kessey and Kessey (1994) FLC 92-495
Lee Steere (1985) FLC 91-626
Mallet v Mallet (1984) FLC 91-507
Milankov and Milankov (2002) FLC 93-095
Mistle v Mistle [2010] FamCA 29
MRR v GR (2010) FLC 93-424
Mulvaney & Lane (2009) FLC 93-404
Pierce v Pierce (1999) FLC 92-844
Poulos and Poulos (1984) FLC 91-515
R v Watson; Ex parte Armstrong [1976] HCA 39; (1976) 136 CLR 248 at 257
Rolfe and Rolfe (1979) FLC 90-62
Russell v Russell (1999) FLC 92-877
Sproat & Brimm [2013] FCCA 1823
Stanford v Stanford (2012) FLC 93-518; (2013) 293 ALR 70
Tait & Densmore [2007] FamCA 1383
Victor & Victor [2011] FMCAfam 920
Wainder & Wainder (2011) FLC 93-473

Applicant: MR ELLIS
Respondent: MS ELLIS
File Number: LNC 515 of 2013
Judgment of: Judge Roberts
Hearing dates: 28, 29, 30 and 31 July 2015
Date of Last Submission: 31 July 2015
Delivered at: Launceston
Delivered on: 28 April 2016

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Turnbull
Solicitors for the Applicant: Rae & Partners Lawyers
The Respondent appeared unrepresented
Counsel for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Mr P Briffa
Solicitors for the Independent Children's Lawyer: Legal Aid Commission of Tasmania

ORDERS

  1. That MR ELLIS (“the father”) and MS ELLIS (“the mother”) have equal shared parental responsibility for X born (omitted) 2002, Y born (omitted) 2006 and Z born (omitted) 2009 (“the children”).

  2. That the children live with the mother.

  3. That the children spend time and communicate with the father as follows:

    (a)during school terms on a fortnightly basis from after school on Thursday until the start of school on the following Tuesday, commencing on the first Thursday of each school term;

    (b)for one week in each school holiday at the end of Terms 1, 2 and 3 as agreed, but failing agreement for the first week of the relevant school holiday;

    (c)from 5.00 pm on Maundy Thursday until 5.00 pm on Easter…

Continue reading ELLIS & ELLIS

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
ELLIS & ELLIS [2016] FCCA 964
Case
[2016] FCCA 964
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of ELLIS & ELLIS, Judge Roberts of the Family Court of Australia considered applications by both the father and mother concerning their children and their property. The dispute involved the father seeking orders for equal time with the children, while the mother, a "born-again Christian," had strongly held beliefs regarding their upbringing, including homeschooling and overseas travel. Concurrently, the court addressed the division of the parties' assets, taking into account their respective contributions as breadwinner, homemaker, and parent, and applying the factors under section 75(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 to achieve a just and equitable settlement.

The court was required to determine the parenting arrangements for the three children, specifically addressing the father's request for equal time and the mother's concerns stemming from her religious beliefs and allegations of family violence. Furthermore, the court had to ascertain the asset pool for division and make orders for the property settlement between the parties, considering all relevant contributions and future circumstances. The court also had to decide on the children's schooling and whether they should be permitted to travel overseas.

Judge Roberts made orders for equal shared parental responsibility, with the children to live with the mother and spend time with the father on a detailed fortnightly and holiday schedule. The court also ordered that the children be enrolled at specific schools and permitted interstate and overseas travel with the children, provided specific notice requirements were met. In relation to property, the father was ordered to transfer his interest in a vacant land property to the mother, who would then indemnify him against any liabilities. The mother was also permitted to deal with funds in a specific bank account to the exclusion of the father, and all other property was to be retained by the party in possession, with all superannuation claims extinguished. The parties' applications for orders under Parts VII and VIII of the Family Law Act 1975 were otherwise dismissed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That MR ELLIS (“the father”) and MS ELLIS (“the mother”) have equal shared parental responsibility for X born (omitted) 2002, Y born (omitted) 2006 and Z born (omitted) 2009 (“the children”).

2.

That the children live with the mother.

3.

That the children spend time and communicate with the father as follows:

(a) during school terms on a fortnightly basis from after school on Thursday until the start of school on the following Tuesday, commencing on the first Thursday of each school term;

(b) for one week in each school holiday at the end of Terms 1, 2 and 3 as agreed, but failing agreement for the first week of the relevant school holiday;

(c) from 5.00 pm on Maundy Thursday until 5.00 pm on Easter Tuesday;

(d) from 3.00 pm on Christmas Eve until 3.00 pm on New Year’s Eve each year;

(e) for two further periods of one week each during the children’s long summer school holidays as may be agreed, but failing agreement as nominated by the father in writing at least 21 days prior to start of the relevant long summer school holiday;

(f) commencing in the 2018/2019 long summer school holidays the father may at his election combine two of the periods referred to in paragraphs (d) and (e) to provide for a single period of two weeks, provided that the father advises the mother of his election at least 21 days prior to the start of the relevant long summer school holiday;

(g) on each of the children’s birthdays at times to be agreed between the parties, but failing agreement if the birthday falls on a weekday for a minimum of two hours after school and if it falls on a non-school day for a minimum of five hours;

(h) on Father’s Day from 10.00 am on the Saturday preceding Father’s Day until 9.00 am or the start of school on the following Monday;

(i) by telephone at reasonable times; and

(j) on such further or other occasions as may be agreed between the father and the mother from time to time.

4.

That unless the parties agree otherwise the mother must collect the children from the father’s residence for the purposes of changeover at the end of each period referred to in paragraphs (c), (d), (e) and (f) of Order No. 3 hereof and the father (or his nominee) must collect the children from, and return them to the mother or school at all other times.

5.

That unless the parties agree otherwise the children must be enrolled at (omitted) School or (omitted) High School.

6.

That the father and the mother are permitted to travel interstate and/or overseas with the children provided that the parent who is not travelling is provided with at least 28 days written notice of:

(a) the travelling parent’s intention to do so;

(b) a detailed travel itinerary; and

(c) full details of how the children may contacted while travelling interstate and/or overseas.

7.

That if the father provides the mother with Australian passport application forms for the children, the mother must return them to the father properly completed and signed within 21 days.

8.

That in the event that the mother fails to comply with her obligations under the preceding Order hereof, the father has leave to apply for passports for the children notwithstanding that the mother has not provided her consent to the issue of such passports.

9.

That within 45 days the father must do all such acts and things and sign all necessary documents to transfer to the mother all his right, title and interest in the vacant land known as Property F in Tasmania being the property comprised and described in Certificate of Title Volume (omitted) Folio (omitted) (‘the Property F property”).

10.

That the mother must thereafter indemnify the father against any liability for any outgoings in respect of the Property F property.

11.

That Orders No. 1 and 2 of this Court of 30 October 2014 be and are hereby discharged and the mother is entitled to deal with the funds held in (omitted) Bank account No. (omitted) in her name to the exclusion of the father.

12.

That unless specified in these Orders:

(a) each party is solely entitled to the exclusion of the other to all other property in possession of that party as at the date of these Orders;

(b) each party is solely liable for and must indemnify the other against any liability encumbering any item of property to which that party is entitled pursuant to these Orders; and

(c) any claim that either party may have to any superannuation benefit belonging to or earned by the other is extinguished.

13.

That the parties’ Applications for Orders pursuant to Parts VII and VIII of the Family Law Act 1975 are otherwise dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.