FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ELKIN & CHENEY | [2008] FMCAfam 1361 |
| FAMILY LAW – Child aged seven – mother has Tanzanian background – father has Cypriot background – parties never lived together – parties have poor relationship – child born in France – father’s identity not registered on birth certificate – parties in dispute regarding child’s given name – child registered as “[E]” as first given name – mother seeks this name – father asserts child identifies as “[G]” and is known by him and his family as such – matters considered – best interests. |
| Family Law Act 1975, ss.68LA |
| Taylor v Taylor (1979) 143 CLR 1 Beach & Stemmler (1979) FLC 90-692 |
| Applicant: | MR ELKIN (formerly known as Mr Loder) |
| Respondent: | MS CHENEY (also known as Ms Maltby) |
| File Number: | ADC 5093 of 2007 |
| Judgment of: | Brown FM |
| Hearing date: | 8 December 2008 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 8 December 2008 |
| Delivered at: | Adelaide |
| Delivered on: | 15 December 2008 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | In Person |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | No appearance |
| Counsel for the Independent Children’s Lawyer | Mr T Stephen |
| Solicitors for the Independent Children’s Lawyer | Legal Services Commission |
ORDERS
That for all purposes relating to his education and medical treatment and other issues arising to him from the application of the Australian Passports Act 2005, the Social Security Act 1991, the Health Insurance Act 1973 and all matters relating to taxation and other social security entitlements the child herein be known as [E.G.N.Elkin-Maltby].
All other applications herein be otherwise dismissed.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Elkin & Cheney is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT ADELAIDE |
ADC 5093 of 2007
| MR ELKIN (formerly known as Mr Loder) |
Applicant
And
| MS CHENEY (also known as Ms Maltby) |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
Mr Elkin “the father” was born in 1960 in South Australia. His parents were both born in Cyprus. In the past, the father has changed his surname to “Loder”.
The father has also, from time to time, adopted the given name of [T]. In part, no doubt, these changes came about for ease of reference. However, since October of last year, he has resumed the name set out above, which appears on his original birth certificate.
Ms Cheney “the mother” was born in Tanzania in 1970. Cheney is a surname the mother has assumed through marriage. Her original surname is Maltby.
The parties met in Adelaide, in late 2000, and had a brief relationship. The mother has a child, [X], who lives with her father, in France. The mother has spent regular periods of time, living in France, in the past.
The mother fell pregnant to the father in December 2000. The parties have never lived together and terminated their relationship in January of 2001. The mother returned to France in July 2001.
The mother was…
Continue reading Elkin and Cheney
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Elkin and Cheney [2008] FMCAfam 1361
- Case
- [2008] FMCAfam 1361
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the court had the authority to intervene in the naming of a child and, if so, what name should be assigned to the child for the purposes outlined in the application. The court needed to determine if there were any overriding considerations that should inform the choice of name and whether it was appropriate to grant a name that was not agreed upon by both parents.
In reaching its decision, the court noted the practical difficulties that an unresolved name dispute could cause for the child, particularly in navigating legal and administrative processes. It acknowledged the importance of stability and consistency in a child's identity, which is often reflected in their name. The court concluded that it had the jurisdiction to intervene in such matters and that it was in the child's best interest to assign a specific name for the purposes of the application. The chosen name, [E.G.N.Elkin-Maltby], was seen as a compromise that incorporated elements from both parents' surnames. Other applications made by the parties were dismissed as they were not directly related to the naming issue.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That for all purposes relating to his education and medical treatment and other issues arising to him from the application of the Australian Passports Act 2005, the Social Security Act 1991, the Health Insurance Act 1973 and all matters relating to taxation and other social security entitlements the child herein be known as [E.G.N.Elkin-Maltby].
2.
All other applications herein be otherwise dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.