Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2009] AATA 338
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No 2007/3459
VETERANS’ APPEALS DIVISION ) Re Elizabeth Rennie Applicant
And
Repatriation commission
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Dr I Alexander, Member
Rear Admiral Horton ao, MemberDate13 May 2009
PlaceSydney
Decision The decision under review is affirmed. ....................[sgd]..........................
Dr I Alexander
Member
Is there a reasonable hypothesis?
11. It is common ground between the parties that Mr Rennie started smoking in 1944 when serving in the Royal Navy and that he continued to smoke until his death in 1994.
12. It is also agreed that in 1993 Mr Rennie was diagnosed as suffering from peripheral vascular disease and that in 1994 he was admitted to Concord Hospital where he underwent a right femoro-perineal bypass operation.
13. Following this operation Mr Rennie developed a wound infection and treatment in the form of intravenous vancomycin was commenced.
14. On the 30 March 1994 following an intravenous dose of vancomycin Mr Rennie suffered a cardiac arrest and died.
15. The hypothesis proposed by the applicant is that Mr Rennie’s smoking caused his peripheral vascular disease and because of the circumstances of his operational service he had increased his smoking during that service and for some time after and that this increase in smoking had made a material contribution to the development of his peripheral vascular disease.
16. In support of the hypothesis in respect of the relationship between smoking and the development of peripheral vascular disease the applicant points to Repatriation Medical Authority ( the RMA) determination in the SOP concerning “Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease “ Instrument No. 65 of 2002
17. In this SOP the RMA expresses the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease can be related to relevant service rendered by a veteran on the condition one of a number of factors must be related to any relevant service rendered by the veteran.
18. Factor 5(a) in the SOP “smoking at least five cigarettes per day or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products, for at least three years before the clinical onset of atherosclerotic peripheral vascular disease and where smoking has ceased, the clinical onset has occurred within 20 years of cessation;…”
19. We accept that smoking is causally connected to the development of peripheral vascular disease but note that factor 5(a) seems to imply that the onset of smoking at a particular level and over a minimum period, rather than the accumulated amount of smoking is the relevant issue.
20. Also in support of the hypothesis, Mrs Rennie claims that her husband had told her that he had increased his smoking during his operational service and that she had observed an increase in his smoking when he had returned from Korea.
21. After having considered the material before us we are satisfied that hypothesis proposed by the applicant is a reasonable hypothesis within the meaning of s120 of the VE Act.
Is the hypothesis…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Elizabeth Rennie and Repatriation commission and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2009] AATA 338
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
The decision under review is affirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.