Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
4
-
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v IGT
[2007] APO 7
Citation 1
(Para 19)
…as constituting extenuating circumstances in the context of opposition proceedings. See in this regard Eleven Lighting Pty Limited v Interium Pty Ltd [2002] APO 25, Imarx Pharmaceutical Corp v Mallinkrodt Medical Incorp [2001] APO 10, Lessafre et Cie v Burns Philip Research & Development Pty Ltd (1997) AIPC 91-3…
-
The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology v Amgen Inc
[2003] APO 55
Citation 2
(Para 18)
…The issue of global communication was considered by the Delegate in Eleven Lighting Pty Limited v Interium Pty Ltd [2002] APO 25 (27 June 2002): "Mr Evans submitted that communications infrastructure globally and particularly between the USA and Australia should not hinder the presentation of evidence from a par…
-
Cryovac, Inc v Pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc
[2003] APO 18
Citation 3
…demonstrated lack of interest in seriously prosecuting these oppositions. The applicant referred me to Eleven Lighting Pty Limited v Interium Pty Ltd [2002] APO 25 (27 June 2002). In Eleven Lighting , the delegate allowed only a partial extension to serve evidence in answer in light of the applicant's demonstrat…
-
General Electric Company v Vestas Wind Systems A/S
[2002] APO 43
Citation 4
(Para 17)
…in the context of opposition proceedings such as may support an extension of time. See in this regard Eleven Lighting Pty Limited v Interium Pty Ltd [2002] APO 25, Imarx Pharmaceutical Corp v Mallinkrodt Medical Incorporated [2001] APO 10, Lesaffre et Cie v Burns Philip Research & Development Pty Ltd (1997) AIP…
Statutory Material Cited
0