| [2015] FWCA 6366 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Electromaster Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd
(AG2015/5442)
ELECTROMASTER HOLDINGS (NSW) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Electrical contracting industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 14 SEPTEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Electromaster Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Electromaster Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Electromaster Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Agreement was approved on 14 September 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 21 September 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 14 September 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415741 PR571914>
- AGLC
- Electromaster Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 6366
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6366
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement provided for the fair and reasonable terms of employment as required by section 233 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission examined whether the agreement contained the prescribed minimum terms and conditions, and if it was free from any terms that were contrary to public policy or contravened any other provision of the Fair Work Act. A particular focus was on whether the agreement adequately addressed the pay rates and conditions for employees, including those in specific roles or classifications.
The Commission found that the agreement contained the prescribed minimum terms and conditions and was free from any terms that were contrary to public policy. The agreement included provisions for pay rates and conditions for various employee classifications, although some minor adjustments were recommended. The Commission concluded that while the agreement was not perfect, it was fair and reasonable overall. The Commission approved the agreement with some minor modifications to ensure compliance with the statutory requirements. The final orders included the approval of the Enterprise Agreement 2015 with the recommended adjustments.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.