Elboray v Minister for Immigration
[2016] FCCA 2710
•20 October 2016
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ELBORAY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2016] FCCA 2710 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Migration & Refugees Division) – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) – no appearance by the applicant – application of r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules – the application is dismissed. |
| Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s.476. Federal Circuit Court Rules 200, r.13.03C(1)(c). |
| Applicant: | KHALED ABDELWANIS ELBORAY |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
| File Number: | SYG 1667 of 2016 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 20 October 2016 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 20 October 2016 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 20 October 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitors for the Respondents: | Ms M Ibrahim HWL Ebsworth Lawyers |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The Applicant pay the costs of the First Respondent fixed in the amount of $5,600.00.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 1667 of 2016
| KHALED ABDELWANIS ELBORAY |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is an application for a Constitutional writ under s.476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (“the Act”) within the Court’s jurisdiction in respect of the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) made on 24 may 2016 affirming the decision of the delegate not to grant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.
On 25 August 2016 the Registrar of the Court made orders fixing the matter for hearing today at 2.15 pm. The matter has been called outside the court and the applicant has failed to appear.
The first respondent has moved under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 for the application to be dismissed. The first respondent has tendered correspondence, which has been marked
“Exhibit A”, dated 13 October 2016, sent to both the applicant’s residential address and email address as identified on the initiating application in the proceedings in this Court. No explanation for the absence of the applicant has been provided to the first respondent.
It is now past 2:30pm and the applicant has failed to appear. I am satisfied that the applicant was aware of the hearing date. I am satisfied that this is an appropriate matter in which to exercise the Court’s powers under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
The application is dismissed under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Date: 21 November 2016
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Jurisdiction
0
0
3