Ekermawi v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 15 min read

CITATION: Ekermawi v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd and anor [2007] NSWADT 295
DIVISION: Equal Opportunity Division
PARTIES:

FIRST APPLICANT
Sam Ekermawi

FIRST RESPONDENT
Nine Network Australia Pty Limited

SECOND APPLICANT
Sam Ekermawi

SECOND RESPONDENT
Harbour Radio Pty Limited trading as Radio 2GB
FILE NUMBER: 071003, 071004
HEARING DATES: 31 July 2007
SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 31 July 2007
 
DATE OF DECISION: 

12 December 2007
BEFORE: Hennessy N - Magistrate (Deputy President)
CATCHWORDS: Application for leave to proceed
MATTER FOR DECISION: Preliminary matter
LEGISLATION CITED: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
CASES CITED: Veloskey v Karagiannakis [2002] NSWADTAP 18
Xu v Sydney West Area Health Service [2006] NSWADT 3
REPRESENTATION:

In person

K Wood, solicitor (First Respondent)
S Thomas, solicitor (Second Respondent)
ORDERS: 1. Leave is granted for the complaint of racial vilification against Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd to proceed; 2. Leave is granted for the complaint of racial vilification against Harbour Radio Pty Ltd trading as Radio 2GB to proceed.

REASONS FOR DECISION

Introduction

1 Mr Ekermawi is requesting the Tribunal’s permission for two complaints of racial vilification to go ahead despite the fact that the President of the Anti-Discrimination Board declined them as lacking in substance. When the President declines a complaint as lacking in substance, the applicant must obtain the Tribunal’s leave before the complaints can proceed: Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (AD Act), section 96. The first complaint relates to broadcasts on Radio 2GB on 16 and 17 August 2005 by Mr Alan Jones. The second complaint relates to a telecast on Channel Nine’s Today Show on 19 August 2005, again involving Mr Jones. In both cases Mr Jones read an email from a listener by the name of Robert. It appears that the email was in response, among other things, to a program on Channel 7 on 15 August 2005 when three Muslim youths allegedly expressed extremist views and said their loyalties were to Islam, not to Australia.

Content of Radio Broadcasts on 17 August 2005

2 In relation to the broadcasts on Radio 2GB, Mr Ekermawi said that on 16 and 17 August 2005, between 8.45 and 9.15 am Mr Jones made inflammatory comments including reading an email he had received from a listener. Mr Ekermawi also mentioned a telephone call from a person about a hotel on the Gold Coast which has prayer rooms for Islamic people but no prayer rooms for Christians. A compact disc labelled “2GB 16/8/05” was provided to the Tribunal together with a transcript of some of the material on that compact disc. The transcript is set out below:

            ALAN JONES: Ken, hello.

            CALLER KEN: Hello Alan.

            ALAN JONES: Yeah.

            CALLER KEN: It’s always a delight to listen to Radio 2GB because your whole team there, from their management and every single one of you have got such high ratings because you’re so positive, you’re so encouraging, you’re so democratic in so many ways. I just simply love it...

            ALAN JONES: Thank you.

            CALLER KEN: ... I’m entertained, I’m educated.

            ALAN…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Ekermawi v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2007] NSWADT 295
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Ekermawi brought an application against Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd and Harbour Radio Pty Ltd trading as Radio 2GB, seeking leave to proceed with complaints of racial vilification. The complaints stemmed from a television broadcast and radio interview that were considered offensive to the applicant due to their racial background. The application was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.

The court was required to determine whether the applicant's complaints of racial vilification against the respondents were serious enough to warrant leave to proceed. The legal issue was whether the content broadcast by the respondents was reasonably capable of vilifying individuals on the basis of their race, and if the applicant had a real chance of succeeding in the complaint. The court had to consider the language used, the context in which it was used, and the potential impact on the applicant.

The court found that the content in question was capable of vilifying individuals based on their race and that the applicant had a real chance of succeeding in their complaint. The court noted that the language used was derogatory and offensive, and the context in which it was broadcast could lead to the vilification of individuals on the basis of their race. The court granted leave for the complaints to proceed, recognising the seriousness of the allegations and the potential impact on the applicant.

The court made two orders. Firstly, it granted leave for the complaint of racial vilification against Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd to proceed. Secondly, it granted leave for the complaint of racial vilification against Harbour Radio Pty Ltd trading as Radio 2GB to proceed. The decision allowed the applicant to continue with their complaints, providing an opportunity for the issues to be thoroughly investigated and addressed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Leave is granted for the complaint of racial vilification against Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd to proceed; 2. Leave is granted for the complaint of racial vilification against Harbour Radio Pty Ltd trading as Radio 2GB to proceed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.