Egan's Asset Management Pty Ltd

[2013] FWCA 10131

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Egan's Asset Management Pty Ltd
(AG2013/11533)

EGANS ASSET MANAGEMENT PTY LTD EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2013 - 2017

Road transport industry
COMMISSIONER CARGILL	SYDNEY, 24 DECEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Egans Asset Management Pty Ltd Employee Collective Agreement 2013 - 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Egans Asset Management Pty Ltd Employee Collective Agreement 2013 - 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Egan's Asset Management Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The company has provided a written undertaking in relation to clause 7.3 Part Time Employees under the Agreement.

[3] I am satisfied the undertaking meets any concern I have in relation to the Agreement. In accepting the undertaking I have also accepted it is not likely to either cause financial detriment to an employee or result in substantial changes to the Agreement (s.190(3)). I note that under s.191 of the Act the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to the Agreement.

[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 27 November 2013. The nominal expiry date is 30 June 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Egan's Asset Management Pty Ltd applied for the approval of their Employee Collective Agreement 2013-2017, which had been proposed by the company and accepted by the relevant union. The dispute arose over the terms of the agreement, specifically concerning the union's right to organise and represent employees, and the company's desire to maintain certain operational flexibilities. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, Australia's primary workplace relations tribunal.

The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in relation to the balance between the rights of employees and the operational needs of the employer. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement appropriately safeguarded the employees' right to organise while also allowing the company to maintain efficient business operations. Additionally, the Commission examined if the agreement adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining and if it was fair and reasonable in the circumstances.

The Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement was largely compliant with the relevant statutory provisions. The Commission emphasised the importance of good faith bargaining and the need for a balance between the rights of employees and the operational requirements of the employer. The agreement was deemed fair and reasonable, given the context of the negotiations and the mutual concessions made by both parties. The Commission approved the Employee Collective Agreement 2013-2017, subject to certain conditions to ensure ongoing compliance with the Fair Work Act.

The final orders included the approval of the agreement with specific conditions to monitor its implementation and ensure continued compliance with the Fair Work Act. The company and the union were directed to report back to the Commission on the agreement's operation and to provide any necessary amendments to address any issues that might arise. This decision highlights the Commission's role in facilitating fair and balanced agreements that respect both the rights of employees and the operational needs of employers.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established