Edway Training Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Edway Training Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW [2021] NSWCATAD 152
Hearing dates: On the papers
Date of orders: 3 June 2021
Decision date: 03 June 2021
Jurisdiction:Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division
Before: P H Molony, Senior Member
Decision:

1. Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing in this matter.

2.   The application is dismissed for want of    jurisdiction.

Catchwords:

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Civil and Administrative Tribunal – administrative review jurisdiction – no jurisdiction to administratively review a decision by Safework NSW to refuse to enter into a contract with a Registered Training Organisation to do General Construction Induction Training in NSW

Legislation Cited:

Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013

Work Health and Safety Act 2011

Work Health and Safety Regulation 2017

Cases Cited:

Dubow v Mid-Western Regional Council [2019] NSWCATAP 242

White v Sutherland Shire Council [2019] NSWCATAD 100

Texts Cited:

Nil

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: Edway Training Pty Ltd (Applicant)
SafeWork NSW (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
A Soriano (Agent) (Applicant)
S. Hedger (Legal Officer) (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2021/00029653
Publication restriction: Nil

reasons for decision

Introduction.

  1. On 26 August 2020 Edway Training Services Proprietary Limited (Edway) applied to SafeWork NSW to enter an agreement to conduct General Construction Induction Training (GTI) as a registered training organisation (RTO). That application was refused in writing on 8 December 2020. The notice of refusal advised Edway that it could seek an internal review of that decision. This it did, in writing, on 16 December 2020.

  2. On 13 January 2021, an internal review decision advised that the decision to refuse to enter an agreement with Edway to conduct GIT was affirmed, with SafeWork NSW relying on its right to refuse to accept an application from an RTO to deliver GIT, under the RTO conditions for delivering GIT in New South Wales. The decision advised that Edway could seek external review in the Tribunal within 28 days.

  3. On 2 February 2021 Edway filed an administrative review application with the Tribunal with respect to that decision.

  4. From the commencement of the proceedings SafeWork NSW has argued, despite its earlier advice to the contrary, that the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to review a decision by SafeWork NSW to refuse to enter an agreement to conduct GIT with Edway.

  5. At a directions hearing held on 2 March 2021 the Tribunal ordered that the parties file submissions relating to the jurisdictional issue and noted that:

The parties agree that hearing can be dispensed with under section 50 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 and the jurisdictional issue is to be determined on the papers after 6 April 2021.

  1. That timetable was later extended to 13 April 2021 by consent.

  2. The jurisdictional issue has now been referred to me to determine without a hearing.

Material before the Tribunal.

  1. In determining this matter, I have had regard to the following materials provided…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Edway Training Pty Ltd v SafeWork NSW and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWCATAD 152
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Edway Training Pty Ltd, sought to challenge SafeWork NSW’s decision to refuse to enter into a contract for General Construction Induction Training in New South Wales. The matter was heard and dismissed by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales. The Tribunal found that it had no jurisdiction to review SafeWork NSW’s decision to decline entering into a contract with the applicant.

The primary legal issue was whether the Tribunal had the jurisdiction to review SafeWork NSW’s decision. The applicant argued that the decision was subject to judicial review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1991, and that the Tribunal had the authority to review such decisions. SafeWork NSW contended that the Tribunal’s jurisdiction was limited to specific statutory grounds and that the decision did not fall within those grounds.

The Tribunal considered the scope of its jurisdiction under the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013. It found that the decision in question was not a decision that could be reviewed under the Act, as it was not a decision of an administrative character or a decision made in the exercise of a public function. The Tribunal also noted that the decision was not subject to the grounds of review provided for in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1991. As a result, the Tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to review the decision. Consequently, the application was dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to s 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 the Tribunal dispenses with a hearing in this matter.

2. The application is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.