Edge Technology v Wang - [2001] FCA 247

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Edge Technology v Wang [2001] FCA 247
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – documents subpoenaed by petitioning creditor in bankruptcy proceedings – tendered by petitioning creditor as evidence to support sequestration order – whether trustee in bankruptcy may use such documents in pursuing bankrupts for recovery of property.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)
Crest Homes Plc v Marks [1987] AC 829 cited
Edge Technology Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) & Ors v Wang & Anor [2000] FCA 1586 cited
Holpitt Pty Ltd v Varimm Pty Ltd & Ors (1991) 29 FCR 576 referred to
Springfield Nominees Pty Ltd v Bridgelands Securities Ltd (1992) 38 FCR 217 referred to
Sweetman v Australian Thoroughbred Finance Pty Ltd (Lockhart J, 23 July 1992, unreported) referred to
EDGE TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) & ANOR v WANG & ANOR
N 7671 OF 2000
MICROSOFT LICENSING INC v WANG & ORS
N 1347 OF 1999
CONTI J
26 FEBRUARY 2001
SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 7671 OF 2000

BETWEEN:

EDGE TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVER APPOINTED) ACN 003 761 144
FIRST APPLICANT

EDGE HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVER APPOINTED) ACN 061 986 221
SECOND APPLICANT

AND:

JEN-TSE WANG (also known as Johnson Wang)
FIRST RESPONDENT

SIU CHUI LAI WANG (also known as Phynia Wang)
SECOND RESPONDENT

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY

N 1347 OF 1999

BETWEEN:
AND:

MICROSOFT LICENSING INC
APPLICANT/CROSS RESPONDENT

JEN-TSE WANG (also known as JOHNSON WANG)
FIRST RESPONDENT

SIU CHUI LAI WANG (also known as PHYNIA WANG, SIU CHUI LAI and SIU CHUI WANG)
SECOND RESPONDENT

EDGE TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVER APPOINTED) (ACN 003 761 144)
THIRD RESPONDENT

KTX TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (ACN 052 845 557)
FOURTH RESPONDENT

JEN-TSE WANG (also known as JOHNSON WANG), SIU CHUI LAI WANG (also known as PHYNIA WANG, SIU CHUI LAI and SIU CHUI WANG), EDGE TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 761 144), and KTX TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (ACN 052 845 557)
CROSS CLAIMANTS

JUDGE:

CONTI J

DATE OF ORDER:

26 FEBRUARY 2001

WHERE MADE:

SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.EDGE TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (In Liquidation) EDGE HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (In Liquidation) and MICROSOFT LICENSING INC have leave to give to ANDREW HUGH JENNER WILY (by this Order referring also to his employees and agents), in his capacity as trustee of the respective bankrupt estates of Jen-Tse Wang (also known as Johnson Wang (“Mr Wang”) and Siu Chui Lai Wang (also known as Phynia Wang, Siu Chui Lai and Siu Chui Wang) (Mrs Wang), and for ANDREW HUGH JENNER WILY have leave to use, copies of any documents (without limitations including copies of the documents annexed to the affidavit of Maria Jose Campos filed on 19 February 2001 in proceedings N 7671 of 2000) containing passport numbers or identity card numbers of Mr Wang and/or Mrs Wang produced in response to subpoenas addressed to the Proper Officer, the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs in these proceedings,…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Edge Technology v Wang and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2001] FCA 247
Decision Date: 26 FEBRUARY 2001

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Edge Technology Pty Limited (In Liquidation) and others versus Andrew Hugh Jenner Wily, the court was presented with an application for leave to access certain personal documents of Jen-Tse Wang (also known as Johnson Wang) and Siu Chui Lai Wang (also known as Phynia Wang, Siu Chui Lai, and Siu Chui Wang, Mrs Wang). The applicants sought to investigate whether the Wangs own any property in Hong Kong or elsewhere, for the purposes of recovering assets related to their bankrupt estates. The case was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicants had sufficient grounds to access the personal information of the Wangs, specifically their passport and identity card numbers, in order to investigate potential property ownership. The court needed to balance the applicants' right to access information pertinent to the administration of the bankrupt estates against the Wangs' right to privacy and confidentiality of personal information. Furthermore, the court had to consider whether the application complied with the relevant legal frameworks governing the disclosure of personal information and the administration of bankruptcies.

The court found that the applicants had provided adequate justification for accessing the Wangs' personal documents. The court recognised the importance of investigating potential property ownership to ensure the effective administration of the Wangs' estates. The judge acknowledged the sensitivity of the information but determined that the applicants' need outweighed the Wangs' privacy concerns in this instance. The court granted the applicants leave to use the documents for the stated purposes. The decision was based on the principle that the administration of estates must be thorough and that the investigation of potential assets is a legitimate part of that process.

In its orders, the court granted the applicants leave to access and use the Wangs' personal documents as needed to investigate property ownership and for any other purpose related to the administration of the bankrupt estates. The court's decision ensures that the applicants can proceed with their investigation in a manner that is both lawful and necessary for the effective administration of the estates.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. EDGE TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (In Liquidation) EDGE HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (In Liquidation) and MICROSOFT LICENSING INC have leave to give to ANDREW HUGH JENNER WILY (by this Order referring also to his employees and agents), in his capacity as trustee of the respective bankrupt estates of Jen-Tse Wang (also known as Johnson Wang (“Mr Wang”) and Siu Chui Lai Wang (also known as Phynia Wang, Siu Chui Lai and Siu Chui Wang) (Mrs Wang), and for ANDREW HUGH JENNER WILY have leave to use, copies of any documents (without limitations including copies of the documents annexed to the affidavit of Maria Jose Campos filed on 19 February 2001 in proceedings N 7671 of 2000) containing passport numbers or identity card numbers of Mr Wang and/or Mrs Wang produced in response to subpoenas addressed to the Proper Officer, the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs in these proceedings, for the purposes of enabling him (or his servants or agents) to investigate whether Mr Wang and/or Mrs Wang own any property (of any kind) in Hong Kong or elsewhere, and to use for the purposes of seeking to recover any property which he considers may have belonged or may belong to Mr Wang or Mrs Wang or for any other purpose related to the administration of their bankrupt estates.

Note:

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

CONTI J

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Established by: CONTI J

Full text does not contain this section.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY	N 7671 OF 2000

BETWEEN:	EDGE TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVER APPOINTED) ACN 003 761 144 FIRST APPLICANT EDGE HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVER APPOINTED) ACN 061 986 221 SECOND APPLICANT
AND:	JEN-TSE WANG (also known as Johnson Wang) FIRST RESPONDENT SIU CHUI LAI WANG (also known as Phynia Wang) SECOND RESPONDENT
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY		N 1347 OF 1999
BETWEEN: AND:	MICROSOFT LICENSING INC APPLICANT/CROSS RESPONDENT JEN-TSE WANG (also known as JOHNSON WANG) FIRST RESPONDENT SIU CHUI LAI WANG (also known as PHYNIA WANG, SIU CHUI LAI and SIU CHUI WANG) SECOND RESPONDENT EDGE TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) (RECEIVER APPOINTED) (ACN 003 761 144) THIRD RESPONDENT KTX TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (ACN 052 845 557) FOURTH RESPONDENT
JEN-TSE WANG (also known as JOHNSON WANG), SIU CHUI LAI WANG (also known as PHYNIA WANG, SIU CHUI LAI and SIU CHUI WANG), EDGE TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (ACN 003 761 144), and KTX TECHNOLOGY PTY LIMITED (ACN 052 845 557) CROSS CLAIMANTS
JUDGE:	CONTI J
DATE OF ORDER:	26 FEBRUARY 2001
WHERE MADE:	SYDNEY