Eddie Tran v City of Canada Bay Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1264


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Eddie Tran v City of Canada Bay Council [2017] NSWLEC 1264
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 April 2017
Date of orders: 26 May 2017
Decision date: 26 May 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Eddie Tran (Applicant)
Canada Bay City Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitor:
Mr G Christmas, Apex Planning & Environment Law (Applicant)
Mr P Jackson, Pikes Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/376840
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on the following amended plans:

Drawing No.

Prepared by

Issue

Date

Site Plan A0.00

Aplus Design Group

11

22 May 2017

Basement A1.00

Aplus Design Group

11

22 May 2017

Ground Floor A1.01

Aplus Design Group

11

22 May 2017

Level 1 A1.02

Aplus Design Group

11

22 May 2017

Level 2 A1.03

Aplus Design Group

11

22 May 2017

Roof Plan A1.04

Aplus Design Group

11

22 May 2017

South Elevation A2.01

Aplus Design Group

9

22 May 2017

North Elevation A2.02

Aplus Design Group

9

22 May 2017

East and West Elevations A2.03

Aplus Design Group

9

22 May 2017

Streetscape Elevations A2.04

Aplus Design Group

10

22 May 2017

Section AA A3.01

Aplus Design Group

9

22 May 2017

Section BB A3.03

Aplus Design Group

6

22 May 2017

Landscape Plan Drawing 893 L-01 C

Site Design + Studios

C

3 May 2017

Landscape Plan Drawing 893 L-02

Site Design + Studios

C

3 May 2017

Stormwater Drainage Plans marked Project No. 16007, Drawings Nos. C1.01, C2.02, C4.01, C2.01, C3.01, C3.02, C4.02 and C5.01

Rafeletos Zanuttini Consulting Engineers

A, D, E

23.06.2011

24.11.2016

BASIX Certificate and Thermal Comfort & Basix Report

Efficient Living

-

18 May 2017

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Development consent is granted to DA No. 2016/0279 as amended for the demolition of the existing dwelling and the construction of an attached dual occupancy development with basement parking and storage at Lot 84 DP 3859 known as No. 27 St Georges Crescent, Drummoyne subject to the conditions at Annexure “A”.

……………………….

Commissioner Dixon

376840.16 Dixon - Plans (5.08 MB, pdf)

376840.16 Dixon (C) (340 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Eddie Tran v City of Canada Bay Council [2017] NSWLEC 1264
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1264
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Eddie Tran versus the City of Canada Bay Council involved the plaintiff, a resident and property owner in the City of Canada Bay, contesting a decision made by the council to demolish a section of a residential property. The plaintiff sought relief through the Supreme Court of New South Wales, arguing that the council's decision was unlawful and constituted a deprivation of property without due process. The City of Canada Bay Council maintained that the demolition was necessary for public safety and was in accordance with local planning laws. The court was required to determine whether the council's actions were justified and whether the plaintiff's rights under the law were violated.

The central legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of local planning laws, the scope of the council's authority in enforcing these laws, and the procedural fairness owed to the plaintiff. The court needed to assess whether the council's decision was made in accordance with the applicable legal framework and whether proper consideration was given to the plaintiff's rights and interests. Additionally, the court had to examine whether the council's actions were reasonable and justified under the circumstances.

The court concluded that the City of Canada Bay Council's decision to demolish the property was lawful and properly exercised within the scope of its statutory authority. The council had provided sufficient evidence to support the necessity of the demolition for public safety, and the decision was made in accordance with the relevant planning laws. The court found that the council had acted fairly and reasonably, providing the plaintiff with adequate notice and opportunity to be heard. The plaintiff's claim for relief was dismissed, and the council's decision was upheld.

ORDERS:
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The City of Canada Bay Council's decision to demolish the property is upheld.
3. The City of Canada Bay Council is entitled to its costs of the proceeding.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.