Eckhardt Crawford Pty Ltd T/A Back In Motion Health Group Hobart on Murray

[2013] FWCA 884

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Eckhardt Crawford Pty Ltd T/A Back In Motion Health Group Hobart on Murray
(AG2013/4721)

BACK IN MOTION HEALTH GROUP HOBART ON MURRAY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012

Health and welfare services
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON	ADELAIDE, 7 FEBRUARY 2013

Application for approval of the Back in Motion Health Group Hobart On Murray Enterprise Agreement 2012.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Back in Motion Health Group Hobart On Murray Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Eckhardt Crawford Pty Ltd T/A Back In Motion Health Group Hobart on Murray. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 February 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 13 February 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Eckhardt Crawford Pty Ltd, trading as Back In Motion Health Group Hobart on Murray, the applicant sought approval for the Back In Motion Health Group Hobart on Murray Enterprise Agreement 2012 from the Fair Work Commission. The dispute arose from the applicant's desire to secure formal recognition of the terms and conditions of employment outlined in the agreement, which had been negotiated with relevant employee representatives.

The legal issues that the Commission was tasked with resolving included whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved assessing if the agreement had been fairly negotiated, if it contained the necessary minimum terms and conditions, and if it complied with the relevant provisions of the Act. Furthermore, the Commission had to determine if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees it covered and if it complied with the public interest test.

The Fair Work Commission examined the negotiation process, the contents of the agreement, and its implications for the employees and the employer. The Commission found that the agreement had been fairly negotiated, contained the required minimum terms and conditions, and was in the best interests of the employees. It also concluded that the agreement complied with the public interest test and did not contravene any other provisions of the Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the Back In Motion Health Group Hobart on Murray Enterprise Agreement 2012.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established