FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| ECCHELI & ECCHELI | [2017] FamCA 218 |
| FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – INTERIM PROPERTY SETTLEMENT – Where the parties have eight million dollars in a controlled money account – Where the wife seeks an interim property settlement of seven million dollars so she can buy a property – Where the wife’s monthly expenses are greater than her monthly income – Where it was not contended that the wife was likely to receive a sum less than seven million dollars in final property settlement – Where the wife consented to an order that she be restrained from seeking spousal maintenance without leave of the Court – Application allowed. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| Marello & Marello (No 2) [2011] FamCA 799 |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Eccheli |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Eccheli |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 8378 | of | 2016 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 11 April 2017 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Sydney |
| PLACE HEARD: | Sydney |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Rees J |
| HEARING DATE: | 5 April 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Lethbridge SC |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Armstrong Legal |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr Richardson SC |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Barkus Doolan |
Orders
IT IS ORDERED
That the parties do all things necessary to pay out to the wife from the controlled monies account held in the names of the husband and the wife, being account number …76 with St George Bank, the sum of seven million dollars.
That the wife be restrained from making any application for interim or urgent spousal maintenance without first obtaining the leave of the Court.
IT IS NOTED
That the wife makes the following concessions:
(a) That any amount received by the wife by way of interim property settlement will be included in the balance sheet for the final hearing in the full amount; and
(b) That if the wife receives seven million dollars she will be in a position to support herself from her own resources.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Eccheli & Eccheli has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
FILE NUMBER: SYC 8378 of 2016
| Ms Eccheli |
Applicant
And
| Mr Eccheli |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Ms Eccheli (“the wife”) and Mr Eccheli (“the husband”) are engaged in property settlement proceedings.
They commenced living together in 1990 and separated in 2015. They have three adult children.
In December 2016, their former matrimonial home, of which the wife was the registered proprietor, was sold and the net proceeds of the sale, approximately eight million dollars, were placed in a controlled monies…
Continue reading Eccheli and Eccheli
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Eccheli and Eccheli [2017] FamCA 218
- Case
- [2017] FamCA 218
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were the appropriate division of a significant sum of money held in a joint bank account and whether to impose restrictions on future applications for interim or urgent spousal maintenance.
Rees J ordered that the sum of seven million dollars be paid out to the wife from the joint controlled monies account. Furthermore, the court ordered that the wife be restrained from making any application for interim or urgent spousal maintenance unless she first obtained leave from the Court.
Orders
Orders of the court
IT IS ORDERED
1.
That the parties do all things necessary to pay out to the wife from the controlled monies account held in the names of the husband and the wife, being account number …76 with St George Bank, the sum of seven million dollars.
2.
That the wife be restrained from making any application for interim or urgent spousal maintenance without first obtaining the leave of the Court.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.