Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Eastern High Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2023] NSWLEC 1383 Hearing dates: 19, 20 April 2023 Date of orders: 20 July 2023 Decision date: 20 July 2023 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dickson C Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Development application DA0101/22 seeking consent for demolition of the existing structures and construction of a multi dwelling housing development with four dwellings, basement parking and associated works at 15 Boyd Street, Turramurra (Lot 1 in DP 27304) is determined by the refusal of consent.
(3) The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibits 1, G, and C.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION — proposed multi dwelling housing development of four dwellings over basement car park – whether the proposed use is characterised as a residential flat building, prohibited development– whether the request to vary the lot size and frontage standard should be upheld – appeal dismissed.
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 1.4, 4.15, 8.9, 39
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34
Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015, cll 4.6, 6.6
Cases Cited: Baron Corporation Pty Limited v Council of the City of Sydney (2019) 243 LGERA 338; [2019] NSWLEC 61
Botany Bay City Council v Pet Carriers International Pty Ltd (2013) 201 LGERA 116; [2013] NSWLEC 147
Hrsto v Canterbury City Council (No 2) (2014) 204 LGERA 148; [2014] NSWLEC 121
Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (2018) 236 LGERA 256; [2018] NSWLEC 118
Katerinis v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2017] NSWLEC 1479
Level 1 Construction Pty Ltd v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2021] NSWLEC 1405
Mount Annan 88 Pty Ltd v Camden Council [2016] NSWLEC 1072
Texts Cited: Ku-ring-gai Community Participation Plan 2020
Ku-ring-gai Development Control Plan 2015
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Eastern High Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
J Smith (Applicant)
G Farland (Respondent)
Tyrrell’s Planning Law (Applicant)
Hones Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2022/199935 Publication restriction: Nil
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: The Applicant, Eastern High Pty Ltd is the owner of land known as 15 Boyd Street, Turramurra (Lot 1 in DP 27304) and proposes to redevelop the site as multi dwelling housing containing four dwellings over four storeys. The Applicant appeals, pursuant to s 8.9 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the EPA Act), the deemed refusal of their development application by Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (the Respondent).
-
The development application seeks consent for:
Demolition of existing structures,
Tree removal,
Construction of multi dwelling housing consisting of four dwellings with basement car parking,
A new 1.8m high fence along the western and south-western boundaries of the site,
Landscaping and site works.
-
The matter was listed for conciliation on 2 November 2022 pursuant to s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). The conciliation conference was terminated, and the matter was subsequently listed for hearing.
-
On 9 February 2023, the Court granted leave for the amendment of the development application…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Eastern High Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] NSWLEC 1383
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the council's decision to refuse consent was lawful and if the applicant's development application complied with relevant planning and environmental legislation. The court had to examine the evidence and submissions provided by both parties, including the merits of the development application, the potential environmental impacts, and compliance with planning schemes and policies. Furthermore, the court needed to assess whether the council's decision was based on proper consideration of the relevant factors and whether the decision was supported by the evidence.
In reaching its decision, the court considered the evidence presented by both parties and the relevant legislative framework. The court found that the council's decision to refuse consent was based on a proper consideration of the relevant factors and was supported by the evidence. The court held that the development application did not comply with relevant planning and environmental legislation and that the potential environmental impacts outweighed the benefits of the proposed development. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal and upheld the council's decision to refuse consent for the development application.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Development application DA0101/22 seeking consent for demolition of the existing structures and construction of a multi dwelling housing development with four dwellings, basement parking and associated works at 15 Boyd Street, Turramurra (Lot 1 in DP 27304) is determined by the refusal of consent.
(3) The exhibits are returned with the exception of Exhibits 1, G, and C.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.