| [2016] FWCA 317 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Eastcoast Development Engineering Pty Ltd
(AG2015/6994)
EDE REGIONAL WORKS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 18 JANUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the EDE Regional Works Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the EDE Regional Works Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Eastcoast Development Engineering Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 January 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE417469 PR576170>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Eastcoast Development Engineering Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 317
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 317
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the agreement complied with the good faith bargaining provisions and the substantive provisions of the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court needed to assess if the agreement was the product of genuine negotiations between the parties and if its terms were fair and reasonable. The dispute also raised questions about the definition of "employee" within the context of the agreement and the application of specific provisions to various classes of workers.
Commissioner Young concluded that the agreement was indeed the result of genuine negotiations and that it met the requirements of the good faith bargaining provisions. The court found that the substantive terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, particularly in light of the economic context in which the negotiations took place. While some concerns were raised about the definition of "employee" and the application of certain provisions, the Commissioner determined that these issues did not significantly detract from the overall fairness of the agreement. Consequently, the application was approved, and the EDE Regional Works Enterprise Agreement 2015 was authorised.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.