| [2018] FWCA 6612 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Dynatech Industries Pty Ltd
(AG2018/3375)
DYNATECH INDUSTRIES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018 - 2022
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 26 OCTOBER 2018 |
Application for approval of the Dynatech Industries Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2022.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Dynatech Industries Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Dynatech Industries Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 November 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 25 October 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE500579 PR701777>
- AGLC
- Dynatech Industries Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 6612
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 6612
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court considered evidence from both parties and examined the bargaining process and the terms of the agreement. The union argued that the bargaining process was conducted in good faith and that the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable. Dynatech Industries, on the other hand, argued that the union had not engaged in genuine negotiations and that the agreement contained provisions that were not in the best interests of the company.
The court found that the agreement was made in good faith and that it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court noted that the union had engaged in extensive negotiations with the company and had made several concessions to reach an agreement. The court also found that the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, and that they provided for a fair and equitable outcome for both parties. The court rejected Dynatech Industries' arguments that the agreement was not in its best interests, finding that the provisions were necessary to ensure a fair outcome for the workers.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement 2018 - 2022, finding that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The commission noted that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable outcome for both parties and that it was made in good faith. The commission also found that the agreement contained provisions that were necessary to ensure a fair outcome for the workers, and that these provisions were not unreasonable or unfair to the company.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.