Dwyer v Craft Printing Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL

CITATION:
Dwyer v Craft Printing Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 254

FILE NUMBER(S):
40207/09

HEARING DATE(S):
10 August 2009

EX TEMPORE DATE:
10 August 2009

PARTIES:
Paul Andrew Dwyer (Appellant)
Craft Printing Pty Ltd (Respondent)

JUDGMENT OF:
Beazley JA     

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION:
District Court

LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S):
DC 1997/08

LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER:
Johnstone DCJ

LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION:
7 April 2009

LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:
Craft Printing Pty Limited v Dwyer [2009] NSWDC 190

COUNSEL:
I Archibald (Appellant)
G George (Respondent)

SOLICITORS:
W Lawyers (Appellant)
David R Purvis & Co (Respondent)

CATCHWORDS:
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay of judgment pending determination of appeal – appellant not in a position to pay the judgment debt and prosecute his appeal – risk that the refusal of a stay would render appeal futile – stay granted – no conditions on the stay imposed – respondent not in any worse position by the grant of a stay without conditions given the financial position of the appellant – by the expedition granted to accommodate interest of the appellant

LEGISLATION CITED:
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52

CASES CITED:
Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation Limited (1985) 2 NSWLR 685
FAI Insurance Limited v Registrar of Workers Compensation Commission of New South Wales (1982) 1 NSWLR 239
McLean Tecnic Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Limited; Kalifair Pty Limited & Anor v Digi-Tech (Australia) Limited & Ors [2002] NSWCA 383; (2002) 55 NSWLR 737

TEXTS CITED:

DECISION:
1. The appeal is listed for hearing on 16 September 2009;
2. The appellant’s submissions are to be filed and served by 27 August 2009;
3. The appellant is to file and serve appeal books by 27 August 2009;
4. The respondent’s submissions are to be filed and served by 10 September 2009;
5. Leave is granted to re-list the matter before the Registrar on twenty-four hours notice;
6. A stay of the judgment of his Honour Johnstone DCJ given on 7 April 2009 pending determination of the appeal is granted;
7. The costs of the notice of motion be costs on the appeal;
8. The return date of the notice of appeal is vacated;  and
9. Any reply to the respondent’s submissions is to be filed by 14 September. 

JUDGMENT:

- 6 -

IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL

CA 40207/09

BEAZLEY JA

Ex tempore 10 August 2009

Paul Andrew Dwyer v Craft Printing Pty Limited

Judgment

  1. HER HONOUR:  The appellant, Paul Andrew Dwyer, has filed an appeal against an order for judgment against him in a sum exceeding $400,000 made by Johnstone DCJ on 7 April 2009.  The debt for which judgment was given arose in circumstances where his Honour found that Mr Dwyer had signed a personal guarantee in respect of debts incurred by a company called Comsta Pty Limited (Comsta), of which he was the sole shareholder and director.  The guarantee was given in conjunction with an Application…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Dwyer v Craft Printing Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2009] NSWCA 254
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Dwyer v Craft Printing Pty Ltd*, the appellant sought a stay of a judgment debt granted by the District Court pending the determination of his appeal. The core of the dispute revolved around the appellant's financial inability to satisfy the judgment debt and simultaneously pursue his appeal, raising concerns that a refusal of the stay would render the appeal nugmatic.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether to grant a stay of the judgment. This required the court to consider the appellant's financial circumstances, the potential for the appeal to become futile if a stay was refused, and the prejudice to the respondent if a stay was granted.

The court reasoned that the appellant's inability to pay the judgment debt meant that refusing a stay would likely render the appeal nugatory. Given the appellant's financial position, the court concluded that the respondent would not be in a worse position by the grant of a stay without conditions. The court also took into account the expedition granted to accommodate the appellant's interests. Consequently, the court granted the stay of the judgment pending the determination of the appeal. The court also made orders regarding the listing of the appeal, the filing of submissions and appeal books, and the costs of the notice of motion.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal is listed for hearing on 16 September 2009; 2. The appellant's submissions are to be filed and served by 27 August 2009; 3. The appellant is to file and serve appeal books by 27 August 2009; 4. The respondent's submissions are to be filed and served by 10 September 2009; 5. Leave is granted to re-list the matter before the Registrar on twenty-four hours notice; 6. A stay of the judgment of his Honour Johnstone DCJ given on 7 April 2009 pending determination of the appeal is granted; 7. The costs of the notice of motion be costs on the appeal; 8. The return date of the notice of appeal is vacated; and 9. Any reply to the respondent's submissions is to be filed by 14 September.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.