Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Duratyne Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2020] NSWLEC 1252 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 9 June 2020 Date of orders: 16 June 2020 Decision date: 16 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Bish C Decision: The Court orders:
(1) Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely upon the amended plans and documents listed in Condition 1.1 of Annexure “A” hereto and to delete the conditions of the consent relating to BASIX.
(2) The appeal is upheld.
(3) The modification application as amended to amend Development Consent DA53996/2018, which applies to the land at 78 Glenworth Valley Road, Wendoree Park, is conditionally approved such that the consent is modified as indicated in Annexure “A”.Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Fisheries Management Act 1994
Gosford Local Environmental Plan 2014
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004
State Environmental Planning Policy (Coastal Management) 2018Texts Cited: Gosford Development Control Plan 2013 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Duratyne Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Central Coast Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
J Reid (Applicant)
S Simington (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2019/337669 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against refusal of the modification application of an existing development consent, DA53996/2018 by Central Coast Council (hereafter the Council), which as amended, seeks removal of unapproved hardstand areas, construction of new landscaping, windows to studio and stormwater works, and to regularise height of existing studio and existing, unapproved hardstand areas on Lot 16 DP 25510, also known as 78 Glenworth Valley Road, Wendoree Park (hereafter the site).
-
The site is currently occupied with a residential dwelling and studio. The studio was previously approved under DA (53996/2018), with a subsequent modification of the DA (approved as Part 2 of this consent).
-
This Class 1 appeal is made under s 4.55(1A) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act 1979).
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34AA(2) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act 1979) between the parties, which was held on 9 June 2020. I presided over the conciliation conference. There were no objectors heard at the conciliation.
-
At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the Court and to the parties. This decision is to uphold the appeal and grant consent to modify DA53996/2018, based on conditions and amended plans that the DA relies upon.
-
Pursuant to s 34(3) of the LEC Act 1979, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision, if it is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties' decision involves the Court exercising its function under s 4.55(1A) of the EPA Act 1979 to grant consent to modify DA53996/2018, with conditions. The proposed works were described to the Court, as shown in the amended plans attached to the s34 agreement, and upon which the Court relies to consent to this agreement.
-
The parties identified the jurisdictional prerequisites of particular relevance in these proceedings, pursuant to consideration under s 4.55(1A) of the EPA Act 1979, as: Fisheries Management Act 1994 (FM Act); State Environmental Planning Policy (Coastal Management) 2018 (SEPP Coastal); State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004 (SEPP BASIX); Gosford Local Environmental Plan 2014 (GLEP); and Gosford Development Control Plan 2013 (GDCP). The parties agree that the amended plans and conditions of consent relate to the merits of the proposal.
-
The parties agree that the relevant provisions of the SEPP BASIX have been satisfied, as the studio does not require a BASIX certificate.
-
The parties also agree that the requirements of the SEPP Coastal have been satisfied, specifically cl 10(4), by the proposed works that prevent runoff from the site, protect water quality and prevent any adverse impact on protected mangrove species, pursuant to the FM Act. The parties agree that the amended plans relied upon and the conditions of consent are based on modelling, and therefore result in minimal environmental impact.
-
The site is zoned E2 Environmental Conservation, pursuant to the GLEP. The proposed development is permissible and consistent with the objectives of the zone. The parties agree that the relevant requirements of the GLEP are satisfied, by the supporting documents and amended plans, to modify the approved consent, as sought under this appeal.
-
Based on the amended plans and supporting documents assessed under this appeal, the contentions that relate to the controls of the GDCP are resolved to the satisfaction of the parties. The respondent confirms that notification of the application under appeal was not required, pursuant to the GDCP, as the proposed works were deemed of minimal environmental impact and minor in nature.
-
The parties agree that the proposed modification is, of minimal environmental impact, substantially the same as previously approved and is not required to be notified. The parties confirm that no works that are the subject of the agreement and that form part of the modified consent granted are to be undertaken on Crown lands (specifically adjacent to the site, between Mangrove Creek). By consent of the Council, the agreed landscaping work on Council owned land adjacent to Glenworth Valley Road is approved.
-
I am therefore satisfied that there are no jurisdictional impediments to this agreement and that the modification sought under this appeal to DA53996/2018, based on the amended plans and conditions of consent, satisfies the requirements of s 4.55(1A) of the EPA Act 1979.
-
As the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act 1979 to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
-
The Court orders:
Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely upon the amended plans and documents listed in Condition 1.1 of Annexure “A” hereto and to delete the conditions of the consent relating to BASIX.
The appeal is upheld.
The modification application as amended to amend Development Consent DA53996/2018, which applies to the land at 78 Glenworth Valley Road, Wendoree Park, is conditionally approved such that the consent is modified as indicated in Annexure “A”.
…………………………
S Bish
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (213470, pdf)
Plans (5243967, pdf)
**********
- AGLC
- Duratyne Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2020] NSWLEC 1252
- Case
- [2020] NSWLEC 1252
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant could rely on amended plans and documents to support its modification application, and if the BASIX conditions were appropriately applied. The applicant argued that the refusal to consider the amended plans was an error in law, and that the BASIX conditions were not relevant to the modification application. The Council contended that the refusal was justified, as the amendment was not made in a timely manner, and that the BASIX conditions were correctly applied.
The Court found that the refusal to allow the applicant to rely on the amended plans was an error in law. The Court held that the applicant had acted promptly in submitting the amended plans, and that the Council's refusal to consider them was unreasonable. The Court also found that the BASIX conditions were not applicable to the modification application, as the existing development consent had already been granted subject to BASIX compliance. The Court concluded that the appeal should be upheld and that the modification application should be conditionally approved, subject to certain conditions outlined in the Court's decision.
The Court granted leave to the applicant to rely on the amended plans and documents and to delete the BASIX conditions from the consent. The Court also upheld the appeal and conditionally approved the modification application, subject to the conditions outlined in Annexure “A” of the Court's decision. The Court's decision provides clarity on the appropriate application of amended plans and documents in modification applications, and the circumstances in which BASIX conditions may be applied.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely upon the amended plans and documents listed in Condition 1.1 of Annexure “A” hereto and to delete the conditions of the consent relating to BASIX.
(2) The appeal is upheld.
(3) The modification application as amended to amend Development Consent DA53996/2018, which applies to the land at 78 Glenworth Valley Road, Wendoree Park, is conditionally approved such that the consent is modified as indicated in Annexure “A”.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.