Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak
[2013] HCA 43
Citation 1
(Para 37)
…tment disorder and depressed mood', despite the reference in the second medical panel opinion. She referred me to Wingfoot v Kocak [2013] 252 CLR 480 at [37]: ‘What s.68(4) of the Act on that construction requires is that an opinion of a Medical Panel on a medical question referred to it must thereafter be ado…
-
Lianos v Inner and Eastern Health Care Network
[2001] VSCA 53
Citation 2
(Para 22)
…ould be allowed to access the Reasons for the medical panel opinion except in limited circumstances (see, Lianos v Inner & Eastern [2001] 3 VR 136 at [22] and Nelson v Arrium [2015] VSC 488 at [23-24]). He did not persist with that submission as to accessing the Reasons. . 31I further pointed out that there…
-
Nelson v Arrium Ltd
[2015] VSC 488
Citation 3
(Para 22)
…for the medical panel opinion except in limited circumstances (see, Lianos v Inner & Eastern [2001] 3 VR 136 at [22] and Nelson v Arrium [2015] VSC 488 at [23-24]). He did not persist with that submission as to accessing the Reasons. . 31I further pointed out that there was nothing in the opinion to state that t…
-
Calleja v Franet Pty Ltd
[2000] VSC 339
Citation 4
…37Further, in Caleja v Franet Pty Ltd & Ors [2000] VSC 339 at [27-28] Mr Justice Ashley, in relation to the same medical question (a) stated: 'All in all, it seems to me that paragraph - and thus Question 1(a) - directs the reader to the parts of the body or the faculty claimed to have been injured. If the worker…
-
Baumgartner v VWA
[2019] VCC 1435
Citation 5
…1 anyway. 41There was no dispute before this court or the medical panel as to the reasonable medical and like expenses anyway (see, Baumgartner v VWA [2019] VCC 1435). Any reference to any psychological or psychiatric condition had already been removed from the statement of claim prior to the second referral to th…