Duke, Michael v Pegg, Dale Elsie

Case [1981] FCA 283


I'

CATCHSJOKDS

Damages

f o r personal

i n j u r y - Appeal .

b

CL.? APPEAL

THE SUPXE:,IE COUKT OF THE AUSTK4LIAN CAPITAL

TEKRITORY.

Xo.

A . C . T .

G 1 2 of 1981.

C0iW.l:

Bavies , Lockhart

and K e l l y , 3 5 .

17 Cecerzber 1981.

I

Canljerra, . A . C . T.

' **

.r _.

*

t

" . S

4 h -

a

S

' IN THE,

F DERAL

COURT

OF AUSTRALIA )

AUSTXALIAL? CAPITAL TEPLRITCRY

)

1

No.

A.C.T.

G 1 2 o f

1981

DISTRICT REGISTRY

GEL.IEPA DIVISIOS

ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREflE C0UP.T OF TSE

AUSTPALIAi'J

CAPITAL,

TEmITOKY

BETMCEN:

bII HkEL

DUK

A p p e l l a n t

AM D :

DALE ELSIE PEGG

Responden t

O R D E R

Cavies,

Lockhart

a n d K e l l y ,

J J .

DATE OF ORDER:

1 7 Decenber 1981

Canberra ,

A.C.T.

THE

COUIiT

0RDE:RS THAT:

1.

T h e

a p p e a l

Se

u p h e l d

and

t h a t

tile

judgment

o f

t h e

S u p r e E e C o u r t

c;f

t h e A u s t r a l i a n C a p i t a l T e r r i t o r y b e

s e t

a s i d e .

2.

3 .

T h e

r e s p o n d e n t

p a y

t h e

a p p e l l a n t ' s

c o s t s

of

the

a p p e a l ,

t h o s e

c o s t s t o b2

t a x e d .

13 THE FEDERAL COUET OF AUSTMLIA

) )

AUSTMLIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

No.

A . C . T .

G . 1 2

of

1931

DISTRICT REGISTRY

1

GENE,RAL DIV~SION

1

ON APPEAL FROFl THE SUPKEi4E COURT OF THE

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

DETWEEN : PIICHAEL DUKE

A p p e l l a n t

At? D

:

DALE ELSIE PEGG

Respondent

C O M I ; ' :

nav ies ,

L o c k h a r t

a n d

K e l l y ,

J J .

1 7 December

1981

IiCASONS FOR JUDGMENT

DAVIES, LOCIXART and KELLY, J J .

T h e

a p p e l l a n t

,

who

w a s

bo rn

on

26

Oc tobe r

1953,

was

i n j u r e d

i n

a

o l o t o r

v e h i c l e

a c c i d e n t

o n

3 A p r i l 1979.

He

sued

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t

i n

t h e

S u p r e m e

C o u r t

o f

t h e

A u s t r a l i a n

C a p i t a l

T e r r i t o r y

f o r

d a m a g e s

f o r

a l l e g e d

n e g l i g e n c e .

L i a b i l i t y

was

n o t

c o n t e s t e d .

The

l e a r n e d

t r i a l

J u d g e

g a v e

j u d g m e n t

i n

h i s

f a v o u r

f o r the components - for loss o f

s u a

of

$ 3 0 , 0 7 5 . 4 5 .

T h a t

was

made

up

o f

t h e

f o l l o w i n g

e a r n i n g

c a p a c i t y ,

p a s t

a n d

for

a

s h o r t

- 2 -

tiine

i n

the

f u t u r e ,

$5,963.45;

s p e c i a l

d a m a g e s

$12 ,112

and

n o n - e c o n o n i c

loss

$ 1 2 , 0 0 0 .

T h e

p l a i n t i f f

a p p e a l e d

t o

t h i s

C o u r t ,

c l a i m i n g

t h a t

t h a t

s s e s s m e n t

of

t h e

a p p e l l a n t ' s

non-economic

l o s s was

e r r o n e o u s

i n a l l t h e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s .

B e c a u s e

o f

t l l e i r

S r e v i t y

i t

i s

c o n v e n i e n t

o

s e t

o u t

the

r e a s o n s

fo r

j u d g m e n t

o f

the

l e a r n e d

t r i a l

J u d g e .

He

s a i d : -

" I n

t h i s

case

t h e

f a c t s

are

r e a l l y

i a r g e l y ,

i f

n o t

c o m p l e t e l y ,

u n d i s p u t e d

a n d

the

m a j o r

i s s u e

i s

the

amount

of

damages which

s h o u l d be

a w a r d e d

i n

r e s p e c t

of

non-economic

l o s s .

A s

a l w a y s ,

I

f i n d

myse l f

up

a g a i n s t

t h e

r

a l l y

i n t r a c t a b l e

d i f f i c u l t y

o f

d e c i d i n g

how

f a i r l y

t o

p l a c e

t h e

p a i n ,

s u f f e r i n g ,

i

c o n v e n i e n c e ,

d i s t r e s s ,

d i s c o m f o r t

a n d

so

on

w h i c h

t h e

p l a i n t i f f

has

s u f f e r e d

a n d

w i l l ,

t o

some

e x t e n t ,

i n

t h e

f u t u r e

s t i l l

s u f f e r ,

i n

a n y

f o r a

o f

j u s t

r e l a t i o n s h i p

t o

a

sum

o f

c o n e y .

I bear perr;;anent

i n mind

t h a t t h i s man

w i l l have some

weakness

of

the h i p

a n d

l e g .

lie

w i l l

p r o b a b l y

h a v e

p a i n

s l o w l y

d i m i n i s h i n g

o v e r

f i v e

y e a r s .

He

w i l l h a v e ,

~ r o b a b l y ,

l a n e n e s s

f o r

some

time which may b e

f i v e

y e a r s

a n d

h e

will

have

s c a r s .

I

t e a r

i n mind

t h a t

h e

i s

a

r e l a t i v e l y

young man o f 27 and so by f a r t h e

m a j o r

p a r t

o f

h i s

l i f e

i s

p r o b a b l y

i n

f r o n t

o f

him.

I a l s o

h a v e

t o bear

i n mind

t h a t I

t h i n k

h e

has, i n the

t i n e

s i n c e

t h e

a c c i d e n t ,

s u f f e r e d

v e r y

c o n s i d e r a b l e

p a i n

a n d

some

i n c o n v e n i e n c e .

Taking

a l l t h i s

i n t o

a c c o u n t

a n d

d o i n g

the

b e s t

I

c a n with a

judgment

which

i s

r e g r e t t a b l y

s u b j e c t i v e ,

I

t h i n k

t h a t

t h e

r i g h t

f i g u r e

t o

p u t

o n

t h e n o n - e c o n o m i c

l o s s

i s $12,000 . . .

.

1 1

D u r i n g

t h e

h e a r i n g

o f

t h e

a p p e a l

c o u n s e l

f o r

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t

s t a t e d

t h a t

t h e r e

was

n o

s u g g e s t i o n

t ha t

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

h a d

i n

a n y

way

e x a g g e r a t e d

h i s

c o m p l a i n t s .

When

t h e

l e a r n e d

t r i a l

J u d g e

s a i d

t h a t

' ' the

f a c t s

a re

r e a l l y

l a r g e l y ,

i f

n o t

c o r ~ p l e t e l y ,

u n d i s p u t e d " ,

h e

i s

t o

be

t a k e n

i n

all t h e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

as

h a v i n g

a c c e p t e d

as

w i t n e s s e s

o f

t r u t h

the

p l a i n t i f f ,

h i s

w i f e ,

a n d

t h e

d o c t o r s

c a l l e d

o n

h i s

b e h a l f .

T h e

r e s p o n d e n t

c a l l e d

e v i d e n c e .

n o

No

d i f f i c u l t y

a r i s e s ,

t h e r e i o r e ,

on

t h e

g r o u n d

t h a t

t h e

l e a r n e d

t r i a l

J u d g e

was

i n a

- 3 -

b e t t e r

p o s i t i o n

t o e v a l u a t e

t h e e v i d e n c e

t h a n

i s

t h i s C o u r t .

A s

a

r e s u l t

o

f

t h e

a c c i d e n t

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

was

t r a p p e d

u n d e r

t h e

door

p i l l a r

o f

t h e

v e h i c l e

w h i c h

the

d e f e n d a n t

was

d r i v i n g .

He

f e l t h i s

l e g s

s t a r t i n g

t o

swell

i n

t h e

r e g i o n

of

t h e h i p p o s i t i o n

a n d

n u n b n e s s

i n

t h e i r

lower

p a r t s .

B e c a u s e

o f

h i s

h

e

u n d e r w e n t

a

g o o d

d e a l

o

f

p a i n

w h i l e

t r a p p e d ,

as

h e

was

f o r

a p p r o x i m a t e l y

t h r e e

q u a r t e r s

o f

a n

h o u r .

T h i s

p a i n

was

f i r s t

r e l i e v e d

by

t h e

m i n i s t r a t i o n s

o f

a m b u l a n c e

o f f i c e r s

a n d

s u b s e q u e n t l y

by

i n j e c t i o n s

of

p e t h i d i n e

a t

t h e

h o s p i t a l

w h e r e

h e was

t a k e n .

He

s u f f e r e d

m u l t i p l e

p e l v i c

f r a c t u r e s ,

a n

e x t r e m e l y

cor;;riinuted

p e r t r o c h a n t e r i c

f r a c t u r e

i n v o l v i n g

t h e

u p p e r

e n d

o f

h i s

l e f t

f e n u r

a n d

f r a c t u r e s

i n v o l v i n g

t h e

m i d - s h a f t

o f

h i s

l e f t

t i b i a

a n d

f i b u l a .

H e

unde rwen t

su rge ry

on

9

A p r i l

1 9 7 9 .

I n t h e druhged

i n t e r v e n i n g

six

d a y s

h e

was,

as h e

p u t

i t , v e r y

h i g h l y

and

e x p e r i e n c e d

a

good

d e a l of

p a i n .

On

9

A p r i l

1 9 7 9 ,

Xr

V a n c e ,

a n

o r t h o p a e d i c

s u r g e o n ,

c a r r i e d

o u t

o p e n

r e d u c t i o n

w i t h

i n t e r n a l

f i x a t i o n

b y

p i n

a n d

p l a t e

o f

t h e

p e r t r o c h a n t e r i c

f e m o r a l

f r a c t u r e

a n d

m a n i p u l a t e d

the

f r a c t u r e d

t i b i a

and

f i b u l a ,

e n c l o s i n g

t h o s e

f r a c t u r e s

i n

a

l o n g

l e g p l a s t e r .

T h e

a p p e l l a n t

was

i n

h o s p i t a l

u n t i l

15

i iay

1979.

Twice

a t

l e a s t

i n

t h a t

p e r i o d

t h e

p l a s t e r

was

changed.

Dur ing

t h e c h a n g e s h o s p i t a l

he

s u f f e r e d

a

g r e a t

a m o u n t

o f

p a i n .

tie

l e f t

s t i l l

w e a r i n g

p l a s t e r

w h l c h

was

changed

late

i n

J u n e .

P l a s t e r

was

f i n a l l y

r e m o v e d

on

18

J u l y

1979.

The

a p p e l l a n t

s a y s

h

e

c o n t i n u e d

t o

wear

the

p las t e r

u n t i l

A u g u s t

b u t

i n

t h i s

he scems

t o have b e e n

m i s t a k e n .

iJhen

the

p l a s t e r

was

changed

l a t e

i n

J u n e

i t

was

f o u n d

t h a t

he

had

a

f a i r l y

e x t e n s i v e

-4 -

p r e s s u r e

s o r e

o v e r

the

t a c k

o f

his

l e f t

h e e l .

T h e

s k i n

was

n e c r o t i c .

H e

was

r e f e r r e d

t o

Mr

J a n e s ,

a

p l a s t i c

s u r g e o n .

i v i r

Janes saw t h e

a p p e l l a n t

f i r s t

on

1 0

J u l y

1 9 7 9

a n d

a d m i t t e d

hin

t o h o s p i t a l d e b r i d e d

o n

1 2

J u l y

1 9 7 9

when

the

u l c e r

o n

the heel was

i n

a n

a t t e m p t

t o

p r o m o t e

g r a n u l a t i o n

t i s s u e

g r o w t h

t h r o u g h

the

t e n d o n .

A f t e r

a p p r o x i m a t e l y

t e n

d a y s

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

was

d i s c h a r g e d ,

b e i n g

t h e r e a f t e r

e v i e w e d

a t

w e e k l y

i n t e r v a l s

u n t i 1 , h e u n d e r w e n t a n o p e r a t i o n f o r s k i n g r a f t .

B e f o r e

h i s

a c c i d e n t

h e

p l a i n t i f f

u s e d

t o

jog each

a f t e r n o o n

f o r

a p p r o x i m a t e l y

th ree

q u a r t e r s

o f

a n

h o u r .

'rfe

p l a y e d

g o l f ,

n o r n a l l y

a b o u t

o n c e

a

m o n t h ;

h e

p l a y e d

s q u a s h

u s u a l l y

twice

e a c h week,

f o r

a n

h o u r

at a t i n e .

Eie

d i d

n o t

t r y

t o

r u n

a g a i n

u n t i l

a f t e r

t h e

p l a t e

a n d

p i n

were

r e n o v e d

o n

22

A p r i l

19SO.

The

p r e s e n c e

o f

t h e

p l a t e

a n d

p i n

h a d

c a u s e d

hi12

d i s c o m f o r t

b e c a u s e

o f

h i s

t e n d e n c y

t o

s l e e p

o n

h i s

l e f t

h a n d

s i d e .

When

the

a p p e l l a n t

r e s u m e d

e x e r c i s e

a f t e r

the

r e n o v a l

of

the

? i n

a n d

p l a t e

h e

f o u n d

t h a t

h e

c o u l d

r u n

a p p r o x i n a t e l y

t w o

h u n d r e d

y a r d s

o n l y ,

b e c a u s e

h e

h a d

t o o

many

problems

w i t h

h i s

h i p .

G i v i n g

e v i d e n c e

o n

1 5

A p r i l

1 9 8 1 ,

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

s t a t e d

t h a t h e

s u f f e r e d p a i n

i n

h i s

h i p

w i t h

a n y

l o n g

d i s t a n c e

w a l k i n g ,

t l l a t

he

needed

t o t ake

a

b r e a k of

some

t w e n t y

m i n u t e s

i n

t h e

m i d d l e

o f

a

game

o f

g o l f ,

t h a t

o w a r d s

t h e

e n d

o f

a

rouncri

of

e i g h t e e n holes he

s t a r t e d

t o

f ee l p a i n

a n d

t h a t

he

had

t r o u b l e

s l e e p i n g

o n

t h e

i g h t

a f t e r

p l a y i n g

g o l f .

He

a t t r i b u t e d

t h e

t r o u b l e

t o

p a i n

i n

his

h i p

t h r o u g h

d i s t a n c e

w a l k i n g .

He

f o u n d

h i s

r i g h t

l e g

t o

b e

a

l o t

s t r o n g e r

t h a n

h i s

l e f t

l e g .

Eecause

of

t h i s

h e

s t i l l had

a t

t h e

t i n e

o f

h i s

g i v i n g

e v i d e n c e

some

prob lems

wi th h i s

b a l a n c e .

When

t h e

- 5 -

p l a s t e r

was

r e m o v e d

t h e r e

was

a

good d e a l of

w a s t i n g

a p p a r e n t

i n

h i s

l e f t

l e g b u t g r a d u a l l y

i t

b u i l t

up

u n t i l

a t

t h e

t i n e

o f t h e

h e a r i n g

t h e t e

was

a was t ing

by

compar i son

with

the

r i g h t

l e g

of

a p p r o x i m a t e l y

2cm

only .

He

r e s u m e d

p l a y i n g

s q u a s h ,

t r y i n g

t o

p l a y

o n c e

a

week

b u t

h i s

p l a y i n g

t i n e

p e r

game

was

r e d u c e d

t o

,

h a l f

a n h o u r .

He

g a v e

v i d e n c e

of

the

e x i s t e n c e

of

e x t e n s i v e

b r u i s i n g

s h o r t l y

a f t e r

t h e

a c c i d e n t

b u t

t h i s

d o e s

no t

a p p e a r

t o

h a v e c a u s e d h i m a n y p a r t i c u l a r p r o b l e m s .

F o l l o w i n g

the

s k i n

g r a f t

i n

September

1979

he

found

t h a t

h

e

c o u l d

n o t

wear

c o n v e n t i o n a l

s h o e s

as

t h e y

h a d

a

t e n d e n c y

t o

d i g

i n t o

the back

of h i s h e e l .

On

o n e

o c c a s i o n

he

f o u n d

t h a t

a

smal l

amount

of

s k i n

o n

t h e

s i t e

of

t h e

g r a f t

h a d

worn

away

w i t h

t h e

r e s u l t

t h a t

t h e

area

b e c a m e

i n f e c t e d .

He

was

d u e

t o

unde rgo

a

f u r t h e r s k i n g r a f t

the

week

a f t e r

t h e h e a r i n g

when

i t

was

a n t i c i p a t e d

t h a t

h e

w o u l d

b e

i n

h o s p i t a l

f o r

a

f u r t h e r

two

w e e k s ,

s p e n d i n g

a p p r o x i m a t e l y

a

f o r t n i g h t

a t

h o n e

r e c u p e r a t i n g .

The

a p p e l l a n t

c o m p l a i n e d

t h a t

h i s

l e f t

f o o t

h a d

a

t e n d e n c y

t o

t h r o w

i n

as

though

he

were

p i g e o n

t o e d

i n

t h a t

f o o t .

The

tendency

was

s a i d

t o

be

n o t i c e a b l e

a n d

t o

c a u s e

o t h e r

p e o p l e

t o

comment

o

i t ,

t h u s

m a k i n g

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

s e l f - c o n s c i o u s .

H e

g a v e

e v i d e n c e

t h a t

he

had

a

s l i g h t

l i u p

b u t

t h a t

t h a t

d i d

n o t

c a u s e

him

a n y

d r a m a t i c

p r o b l e n s .

P e o p l e

c o n r ; e n t e d

o

n

t h e

f a c t

o f

h i s

l i m p .

iie

g a v e

e v i d e n c e

o f

a

l a r g e

s ca r

r u n n i n g

f r o m

h

i

s

h i p

t o a

p o i n t

a b o u t

f o u r

i n c h e s

a b o v e

t h e

k n e e

a n d

of

a n o t h e r

scar

some

f i v e

i n c h e s

b y

t h r e e

i n c h e s

l o c a t e d

a b o v e

t h e

k n e e .

It

was

c a u s e d

b y

t h e

e x c i s i o n

o f

s k i n

f o r

t h e

g r a f t

o n

t h e

h e e l .

Z e

s a i d

t h a t

h e

was

s e l f - c o n s c i o u s

a b o u t

the

scars

a n d

t r i e d

t o

k e e p

t h e n

c o v e r e d .

- 6 -

H e

s t a t e d

t h a t

he

d i d

n o t

have

c o n s t a n t

p a i n

i n

h i s

h i p .

T h e

p a i n

was

b r o u g h t

o n

b y

s t r e n u o u s

a c t i v i t y .

He

g o t

p a i n a l s o

in

h i s h i p

d u r i n g

c o l d

weather

a n d ,

i t would

seem

i n

s u c h

w e a t h e r ,

a t

the

s i t e

of

t h e

f r a c t u r e s

of

the

t i b i a

a n d

f i b u l a .

C o m u e n t i n g

o n

the

r e l a t i v e

s t r e n g t h s

of

h i s

l e g s

h e

s a i d the r i g h t was

a

l o t

s t r o n g e r

t h a n

the

l e f t , t h a t

he

found

he

c o u l d

n o t

s u p p o r t

h i m s e l f

p r o p e r l y

when

t r y i n g

t o

l i f t

a n y

w e i g h t s

a n d

t h a t

i f he

b e n t

down

he

found

t h a t

he

h a d

p r o b l e m

when

t r y i n g t o l i f t h i m s e l f

up

on

h i s

l e f t l e g .

He

was

t h e n a s k e d

i f

he

h a d p a i n

i n

a n y o t h e r

p a r t

o f

h i s

b o d y .

H e

r e p l i e d ,

"I

d i d

f o r

sotie

time have

p a i n

i n

the

l o w e r

p a r t

o f

my

S a c k .

I

went

t o

p h y s i o t h e r a p y

a n d

w e

g r a d u a l l y

w o r k e d

o u t

a

c o u r s e

o f

e x e r c i s e s

t o

t r y

a n d

r e l i e v e

t h o s e

p r o t l e x s

i n

tha t a r e a .

If

I keep up

t h o s e

x e r c i s e s ,

I

do n o t c r o s s - e x a a i n e d c o n c e r n i n g

h a v e

a n y

g r e a t

p r o b l e m s

w i t h

my

b a c k . "

IIe

was

n o t

t h e p a i n

i n h i s b a c k .

Asked

a b o u t

h i s

p r e s e n t

a 3 t l i t y

t o

do

h e a v y

t a s k s

& . b o u t

t h e

t l o u s e ,

h e

r e p l i e d

t ha t

he

was

u n a b l e

t o

move

a

r e f r i g e r a t o r

o

r

a n y t h i n g

of

a b o u t

t h a t

w e i g h t

b u t

h e

d i d

n o t

h a v e

s n y

g r e a t

p r o b l e m s

w i t h

g e n e r a l

d u t i e s .

By

g e n e r a l

d u t i e s

h e

a p p e a r s

t o

h a v e

rLeant

g a r d e n i n g a n d

s i n i l a r

t a s k s .

F i n a l l y ,

lle

s t a t e d

t h a t

i f

he

s a t a t a

d e s k for a

2 r o l o n g e d

p e r i o d

o f ,

s a y ,

up

t o

t h r e e

h o u r s ,

h e

h a d

t o

g e t

up

t o

wall<

a r o u n d

a n d

e x e r c i s e

h i s

l e g

b e c a u s e

p a i n

w o u l d

g r a d u a l l y

s t a r t

o

b u i l d

u p .

O t h e r w i s e

h e

h a d

n o

p a r t i c u l a r

p r o b l e m

a t

work .

T h e

a p p e l l a n t ' s

w i f e

gave

e v i d e n c e

w h i c h

c o r r o b o r a t e d

h i s .

Mr

V a n c e

g a v e

e v i d e n c e .

He

a d h e r e d

t o

a n

o p i n i o n

- 7 -

eGr l i e r

e x p r e s s e d

t h a t

"from

a

l o n g

t e rn p o i n t o f

view

he

c o u l d

well

nave

some

p e r m a n e n t

w e a k n e s s

i n

h i s

l e f t

l e g ,

p e r h a p s

some

p e r a a n e n t

l o s s

of

a o v e n e n t

i n

h i s

l e f t

h i p ' ' .

He

t h o u g h t

the

a p p e l l a n t ' s

i n a b i l i t y

t o

j o g

f o r rcuch

beyond

two

hundred

ya rds ,

t h e

l i m i c h t i o n

o n

h i s

a . S i l i t y

t o

p l a y

s q u a s h

a n d

the

d i f z i c u l t y

he

e x p e r i e n c e d

i n

p l a y i n g

u p

t o

e i k h t e e n

h o l e s

o f

g o l f

were

c o n s i s t e n t

w i t h what

he

had

s e e n

of

the

a p p e l l a n t ' s

c o n d i t i o n .

lie

was

t h e n

a s k e d

i n

c r o s s - e x a m i n a t i o n

a

n u n b e r

o f

q u e s t i o n s .

They

and

t he

answers

t o

t he i l l

a r e

s e t

o u t h e r e u n d e r : -

l 1 D o c t o r ,

I

want

t o

a s k

y o u

a b o u t

t h i s

low

back

a c h i n b .

Uhen

d i d you

l a s t

see ;,ir Duke?. . .On

1 7

December

1980.

And had

you

reconmended

some

p h y s i o t h e r a p y

i n

r e s p e c t

of

t h a t

s y u p t o m ? .

. .I

r e c o n r e n d e d

sane

p h y s i o t h e r a p y

i n A u g u s t ,

y e s .

S u t ,

of

c o u r s e ,

t h e

r e p o r t

t h a t

I

am

l o o k i n g

a t

i s

Augus t

1980

and

t h a t

i s

b e f o r e

t h a t

p h y s L o t h e r a p y

was

c a r r i e d o u t ? . . .Yes

. "

I n

tile

r e p o r t

o f

1 5 Aict;ust

1983 ;.lr

V a n c e

h a d

s t a t e d

t h a t

tiie

a p p e l l a n t

h a d

c o n p l a l n e d ,

when

s e e n

on

11

Augcs t

1983, o i

c o n s i d e r a b l e

low

b a c k

& c h e

w h i c l l

h a d

b e c o n e

n o r e

r a r k e d

o v e r

the

l a s t

two

n o n t h s .

tie

had

e x p e r i e n c e d

no

p r e v i o u s

t r o u b l e

w l t h

conp la inec? of

sci,;e

g a i n

o n

e x t e n s i o n .

lie

i n d i c a t e d

t h e

l u n b o - s a c r a l

l e v e l

as

t l l e

s i t e o f

p a i n .

Tilere

was

no

t e n d e r n e s s .

i.lr

Vance

agreed

t h a t

the

a p p e l l a n t

h a d

aaae

h 7 b . t

c o u l d

b e

s a i d

t o b e

a

very

good

r e c o v e r y

i n

r e s p e c t

of

his

o r t h o p a e d i c

i n j u r i e s .

I t

seems

d e s i r a b l e

t o

s e t

o u t

a

n u h e r o f

q u e s t i o n s

a s k e d

by

t h e

l e a r n e d

t r l z l

J u d g e

and

t he

answers

t h e r e t o

g i v e n

b y

i,ir Vance: -

-8-

1 1 D o c t o r ,

h e

now

s a y s

t ha t

t h e

p a i n

t h a t

he

has

i s

s u f f i c i e n t

o

c a u s e

t h e

d i s a b i l i t i e s

a b o u t

r u n n i n g

a n d

p l a y i n g

s q u a s h ;

i n

o t h e r

w o r d s ,

the

p d i n

i s

b r o u g h t

on

by

a c t i v i t y

a n d

i t i s a l s o ,

h e s a i d , w e a t h e r

t o

some

e x t e n t

b r o u g h t

o n

by

c o l d

a n d

a l s o

t o

a

l i t t l e

e x t e n t

b r o u g h t

on

b y

c o n t i n u o u s

s i t t i n g .

I n

t h a t

case

it

i s

r e l i e v e d

w i t h

a

b i t

o f

e x e r c i s e

a f t e r

t h r e e

h o u r s

i t t i n g

a t

his

d e s k .

N O W ,

t h a t

k i n d

of

p a i n a n d p r o b a b i l i t y

s t i f f n e s s

t h a t

h e

h a s ,

what

i s

the

a b o u t

the

pe r lmnence

of

t h a t

would

you Se ab le to say?.

. . I thFnlc

i t

i s l i k e l y

t o

g r a d u a l l y

d i m i n i s h

o v e r

t h e

n e x t

f e w

y e a r s .

I

t h i n k

i t

i s

p o s s i b l e

t h a t

he

n a y

h a v e

d i s c o a f o r t

a f t e r

e x e r t i o n

i n d e f i n i t e l y ,

b u t

I

t h i n k

t h e

d e g r e e

o f

p a i n

i s

l i k e l y

t o d i m i n i s h .

And

he

a l s o

s a y s

t h a t

he l i n p s somewhat

and

t h a t

h2

has

a

t e n d e n c y to

t u r n

i n

the lezt f o o t when

he

walks.

Wt;at

i s t h e

p r o b a b i l i t y

of

t h e

perraa1;ence

o f

t h a t ? . . I

n o t e d

when

I

l a s t

exsrc ined

h im

2nd

repor ted

t3a t

h e

h a d

a

l i t t l e

loss

of

r m v e n e n t

i n

h is

a n k l e

a n d

I f e l t

t h a t

i f

ne

r e g a i n e d

that

l u l l

movement

t h a t

t h i s

t e n d e n c y

t o w a r d s

t u r n i n g

i n

w o u l d

p r o b a b l y

g o ,

a n d

t h i s

i s what I think

i s l i k e l y

t o

h a p p e n .

And

would

t l i a t

b e

a

z a t t e r o f

y e a r s ,

a

a a c t e r

o f

a o n t h s

o r

- - -? .

. T h i s

i s

c o ~ ~ ~ p l i c a t e d

a

l i t t l e

b i t ,

y o u r

X o n o u r ,

t h e

S y

s k i n

g r a f t i n g

p r o c e d u r e s

which

h a v e

Seen

r e q u i r e d

by

t h e

p r e s s u r e

a r e a

on

the

b a c k

o f

h i s h e e l ,

and

t h o s e

o p e r a t i o n s

a r e

1;ot

y e t

f i n i s h e d ,

I

u n d e r s t a n d .

So

t h a t

I

t h i n k

h

e

m i g h t

h a v e

t h i s

t e n d e n c y

f o r

S O G ~

time

t o come y e t ,

b u t

I t h i n k

i n

the

l o n g

ter;;

i-le w i l l g r a d u a l l y g e t o v e r

i t . "

?$r

J a m s

g a v e

v i d e n c e

a l s o .

T h e

u l c e r

on

t h e

r i g h t

heel

:;as

a

Lccr;.

f u l l t h i c k n e s s

u l c e r

w i t 1 1

e x p o s u r e

o f

t h e

t i i a t

t!le

a p p e l l a n t

v o u l d

r e q u i r e

a

s k i n

g r a f t

t o

h e a l

t h e

a r e a

a n d

p o s s i b l y

a

l u r t i l e r

g r a f t

a t

a

l a t e r d a t e

i n

o r d e r

C O

t h i c k e n

u i s a b i l i t y

a s

a

r e s u l t

of

t'rle

l e s i o n

a n d

o n c e

t h e

zrea

had

h e a l e d

f e l t

t:lzt

t1;sre

should

be

no

r e s t r i c t i o n

o n

h i s

a c t i v i t y .

lie

r ev iewed

the

a p p e l l a n t ' s

c o n d i t i o n

o n

22

August

1960.

T h e n

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

c o a p l a i n e d

of

t e n d e r n e s s

i n

t h e

s c a r

-9-

t i s s u e

a r o u n d

the

g r a f t e d

area

o n

t h e

heel.

This

t e n d e r n e s s

p r e v e n t e d

him

f r o r

w e a r i n g

n o r n a l

shoes

a l t h o u d h

he

c o u l d

wall.,

s a t i s f a c t o r i l y

a n d

h a d

r e c o m m e n c e d

s p o r t i n g

a c t i v i t i e s .

On

e x a m i n a t i o n

t h e r e

was

a

2cm X

2cm

d e p r e s s e d area on

the h e e l ,

t h e

s i t e

o f

t n e

s k i n

g r a f t ,

s u r r o u n d e d

bg

a

lcrn

t l l i ck

h a r d

s c a r .

R e p o r t i n g

on

9

Septeraber

1980 PIr

Jaraes

e x p e c t e d

t h a t

i n

t i n e

t h a t

scar

t i s s u e

w o u l d

s o f t e n ,

b e c o n e

m o r e

c l o b i l e

a n d

l z s s

t e n d e r .

'rle

t h o u g h t

t h a t

i f

t h a t

d i d

n o t

o c c u r

scar

e x c i s i o n

a n d

f u r t l l e r

g r a f t i n g

i r i i g h t

b e

n e c e s s a r y

t o

o b t a i n

the

bes t

f u n c t i o n a l

r e s u l t ,

3 u t

d i d

n o t

e x p e c t

t h a t

a

d e c i s i o n

on

t h a t

c o d i d

b e

n a d e

f o r

a t l e a s t

o n e

y e a r .

L i v i n g

e v i d e n c e

on

15 lLpri.1

1581,

;.ir J a d e s said

t i m t

he

f e l t

h a t

h e

a p p e l l a n t ' s

hee l

w o u l d

r e q u i r e

f u r t h e r

s k i n

c o v e r

i n

o r d e r

t o

s t a b i l i s e

tile

a rea

and

he

plaur,eci

t h a t

g r o c e u u r e ,

as

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

h a d

i n c l i c a t e d

i n

h i s

e v i d e n c e ,

l o r

Lhe

n e a r

F u t u r e .

!!e

went

on

t o

s a y ,

"He

may

i n

f a c t

r e q u i r e

two

p r o c e d u r e s

t o

t h i c k e n

u p

t h e

skin

s u f f i c i e n t l y

t o

g i v e

i t

a

s t a b l e

a rsa

there" .

'ile

c o n s i d e r e d

t h a t

a

t h i r d

s k i n

g r a f t i n g

p r o c e d u r e

was

l i k e l y

t o be

n e e d e d .

Each

p r o c e d u r e

w o u i d

r e q u i r e

t h e

t a k i n g

of

a p p r o x i m a t e l y

5 c n

X

4cm

o f

s k i n ,

p r o b a b l y

from

the

u p p e r

p a r t

o f

the

t h i g h .

S i n c e

t h e

t a k i n g

02

s k i i l

f r o x

tibove

tile

k n e e

f o r

tlie

f i r s t

s k i n

G r a f t

;;ad

l e f t

s c a r r i n g

i t seer;s

rcasonable

to assuide that eac l r of

the s e c o n d

a n d

t h i r d

s k i n

z r a i - t s

w h i c h

were

l i k e l y

t o

be

n

eded

would

a l s o

leave

s c a r r i n g .

The

s c a r

p r e s e n t

f r o m

t h e

p r e v i o u s

k i n

g r a f t

a n d

t h e

s ca r s

Iwhich

m i g n t

b e

e x p e c t e d

f r o m

t h e

, u r t h e r

p r o c e d u r e s

x o u l u

o b v i o u s l y

n o t

be

g r o s s l y

d i s f i g u r i n g ,

f o r

;.lr James

a g r e e d

t h a t

tL-,e

f i r s t

s k i n g r a f t

s c a r

\;as

a l m o s t

i n v i s i b l e

w i t h

a

l i t t l e b i t

o f

c e p i g r ; e n t a t i o n

of

t he

a rea

w h i c h

v o u l d

b e

p e r z a n e n t .

i i e

-10-

a g r e e d

t h a t

i t was n o t

a n

o b v i o u s

t h i n g .

H e

a l s o

s t a t e d

t h a t

t h e

p r o g n o s i s

f o r

t e n d e r n e s s

a n d

p a i n

i n

t h e

h e e l

was

good

and

h e

e x p e c t e d

' t h a t

w i t h i n

f ive

y e a r s

t h e

p l a i n t i f f

w o u l d

have

a

p a i n

f r e e

area t h e r e .

C o u n s e l

f o r

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

c r i t i c i s e d

t w o

t h e

f

f i n d i n g s

made

by

t h e

l e a r n e d

t r i a l

J u d g e .

T h e s e

were

t h a t

the

a p p e l l a n t

w o u l d

p r o b a b l y

h a v e

p a i n

s l o w l y

d i m i n i s h i n g

o v e r

f i v e

y e a r s

a n d

t h a t

he'

would

have

l a m e n e s s

f o r

some

t i m e which

might

b e f i v e j u s t i f i e d .

y e a r s .

We

are n o t

s a t i s f i e d

t ha t

these

c r i t i c i sms

a re

When

r e g a r d

i s

h a d

t o

t h e

e v i d e n c e

w h i c h

was

c o n c e r n e d

w i t h

b o t h

p o s s i b i l i t i e s

a n d

p r o b a b i l i t i e s ,

t h e

f i n d i n g s

o n

t h e

t w o

p o i n t s

w h i c h

a re

c r i t i c i s e d

a r e ,

w e

t h i n k ,

f i n d i n g s

w h i c h

were

r e a s o n a b l y

a v a i l a b l e

t o

t h e

l e a r n e d

t r i a l

J u d g e .

If

t h e r e was

e r r o r

i n

t h o s e

f i n d i n g s

i t

was

n o t

s u c h

as

t o warrant

o f

i t s e l f

a n y

i n t e r v e n t i o n

b y

t h i s

C o u r t .

So

much

w e

t h i n k

w a s

c o n c e d e d

b

y

c o u n s e l

f o r

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

when

h e

s a i d ,

"I

do n o t s i g n i f i c a n t o r s u b s t a n t i a l

s u g g e s t

t h a t

o f

t h e m s e l v e s ,

t h e s e

t h i n g s

a r e

n e c e s s a r i l y

matters".

T h e r e

are

two

n a t t e r s

w h i c h

d o

n o t

,seem

t o

h a v e

b e e n

c o n s i d e r e d

s u f f i c i e n t l y

o r

a t

a l l by

t h e

l e a r n e d

t r i a l

J u d g e

when

a s s e s s i n g

d a m a g e s .

F i r s t ,

h e

n a d e

no

r e f e r e n c e

t o

t h e

two

o p e r a t i o n s

w h i c h

t h e

a p p e l l a n t

was

l i k e l y

t o

b e

r e q u i r e d

t o

unde rgo

s o

t h a t

h i s

h e e l

m i g h t

' b e

r e s t o r e d

a n d

o n e

of

which

was

t h e s u b j e c t p o s s i b i l i t y

o f

d e f i n i t e

i n t e n t i o n .

We

t a k e some

a c c o u n t of

t h e

w h i c h

m u s t ,

w e

t h i n k ,

e x i s t ,

h a v i n g

r e g a r d

t o

t h e

t o t a l

e f f e c t

of

t h e

e v i d e n c e

of

Mr

J a n e s ,

t h a t

t h e

f u r t h e r

s k i n

g r a f t s

rsay

n o t

a c h i e v e

t h e i r

o b j e c t .

We

t h i n k

t h a t

two

o p e r a t i o n s

c o n s t i t u t e

s u b s t a n t i a l

r e a s o n s

for

a w a r d i n g

a p p r o p r i a t e

d a m a g e s

t o

t h e

a p p e l l a n t .

-11-

S e c o n d l y ,

r e g a r d

s h o u l d

h a v e

b

e n

h a d

t o

the

a p p e l l a n t ' S

b a c k

o n d i t i o n .

U i t h o u t

s u g g e s t i n g

t h a t

the

q u e s t i o n s

p u t

b

y

c o u n s e l

f o r

the

r e s p o n d e n t

t o Ffr Vance

on

t h i s

s u b j e c t

were

u n i a i r ,

i t

i s

p l a i n

t h e y

a s s u m e d

t h a t

h e r e

h a d

b e e n

a

c o m p l e t e

r e s l i s s i o n

o f

any

symptoms

i n

r e l a t i o n

t o

t h e

a p p e l l a n t ' s

b a c k .

\;e

are

n o t

s a t i s f i e d

t h a t

there was

a

c o m p l e t e

r e m i s s i o n .

I n d e e d ,

as

w e

u n d e r s t a n d

t h e

v i d e n c e ,

i t

seems

t h a t

t h e

a p p e l l a n t ' s

b a c k

c o n t i n u e s

t o

g i v e

t r o u b l e

b u t

t h e

t r o u b l e

i s

a m e l i o r a t e d

b y

e x e r c i s e .

T h e

q u e s t i o n

of

how

l o n g

t h a t

b a c k

c o n d i t i o n

E i g h t

b e

e x p e c t e d

t o

c o n t i n u e

was

n o t

e x p l o r e d

b u t ,

h a v i n g

r e g a r d

t o

t he

f a c t

t h a t

t h e

c o n d i t i o n

was

a t t r i b u t e d

i n

e x a m i n a t i o n

in

c h i e f

t o

t h e

a p p e l l a n t ' s

g a i t

and

t h a t

h e

a p p e l l a n t

i s

l i k e l y

t o

c o n t i n u e

t o

be

laze t o

s o n e

d e g r e e

f o r

a t

l e a s t

f i v e

y e a r s ,

w e

t h i n k

t h a t

t h e

l e a r n e d

t r i a l

J u d g e p a i d

i n s u f f i c i e n t

r e g a r d

t o

t h e p l a i n t i f f ' s b a c k c o n d i t i o n .

\Je

a re

s a t i s i - i e d

t h a t

t h e

a w a r d

i n

f a c t

made

d e m o n s t r a t e s

t h a t

d e g r e e

o f

e r r o r

w h i c h

a t t r a c t s

v a r i a t i o n

upwarus by a n

a p p e l l a t e

c o u r t .

i?e

t h i n k

t h a t

t h e

a m o u n t

w h i c h

shou ld

be

awarded

the

a p p e l l a n t

f o r

n o n - e c o n o m i c

loss

i s

$ 1 8 , ~ 0 0 . 0 0 .

I t

f o l l o w s

t h a t

we

a l l o w

t h e

a p p e a l

a n d

s u b s t i - t u t e

f o r

t h e a;;ourlt

axarded

by

the

l e a r n e d

t r i a l

J u d g e

t h e

sum

of

$ 3 6 , 0 7 5 . 4 5 .

Ttie

r e s p o n d e n t

m u s t

p a y

t h e

a p p e l l a n t ' s

c o s t s

of'

Details
AGLC
Duke, Michael v Pegg, Dale Elsie [1981] FCA 283
Case
[1981] FCA 283
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

-
Michael Duke appealed against the damages awarded to him by the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory for personal injury. The Federal Court of Australia dismissed the appeal and ordered the respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.

Michael Duke was injured in a motor vehicle accident on 3 April 1979. He sued the respondent, Dale Elsie Pegg, in the Supreme Court for damages for alleged negligence. Liability was not contested. The learned trial judge gave judgment in the appellant's favour for the sum of $30,075.45, made up of the following components: for loss of earning capacity, past and for a short time in the future, $5,963.45; special damages, $12,112; and non-economic loss, $12,000. The plaintiff appealed to the Federal Court of Australia, claiming that the assessment of the appellant's non-economic loss was erroneous in all the circumstances. The court held that there was no error in the assessment of the appellant's non-economic loss. The court also held that the two operations which the appellant was likely to undergo so that his heel might be restored constituted substantial reasons for awarding appropriate damages to the appellant. The court further held that regard should have been had to the appellant's back condition, which continues to give trouble but the trouble is ameliorated by exercise. The court was satisfied that the award in fact made demonstrates that degree of error which attracts variation upwards by an appellate court. The court allowed the appeal and substituted for the amount awarded by the learned trial judge the sum of $36,075.45. The respondent must pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.