DUCKETT & ROBINSON

Case [2015] FCCA 2275


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

DUCKETT & ROBINSON [2015] FCCA 2275
Catchwords:
CHILD SUPPORT – Stay – application for stay of administrative assessment – where mother has absconded from Australia with the child – whether payments of child support should be stayed – where order made that child should reside with father in Australia – public policy considerations – whether a party removed the child from Australia contrary to either s.65Y or s.65Z of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Legislation:

Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth), s.54E

Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988, (Cth), ss.104, 111C

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss.65Q, 65Y, 65Z, 67Q, 69VA

Cases cited:
Duckett & Robinson [2015] FCCA 997
Garth & Hope [2011] FMCAfam 41
Jones v Child Support Registrar [2007] FCA 1731
Redmond & Redmond & Ors [2013] FamCAFC 161
Yathopoulos & Komine & Anor [2013] FCCA 267
Applicant: MR DUCKETT
Respondent: MS ROBINSON
File Number: SYC 5776 of 2013
Judgment of: Judge Scarlett
Hearing date: 11 August 2015
Date of Last Submission: 11 August 2015
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 11 August 2015

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Guterres
Solicitors for the Applicant: Derham Houston
Respondent: No appearance

ORDERS

UNTIL FURTHER ORDER

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to proceed ex parte.

  2. The administrative assessment of child support no. (omitted) is stayed in respect of the child X born (omitted) 2011.

  3. The collection of ongoing payments of child support and any outstanding arrears of child support in respect of the above administrative assessment is stayed.

  4. The Child Support Registrar is restrained from taking any action to disburse any money currently being held by the Registrar in respect of the above administrative assessment is stayed.

  5. The Applicant is to serve a sealed copy of these Orders upon the Child Support Registrar within seven (7) days.

  6. The Applicant’s costs of this Application are reserved.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Duckett & Robinson is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT SYDNEY

SYC 577 of 2013

MR DUCKETT

Applicant

And

MS ROBINSON

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Application in a Case

  1. The Applicant is the Father of a little boy called X, who is aged 4 years and 7 months. He is seeking a stay of the current assessment of child support relating to the child, even though the child is still in the mother’s care.

  2. The circumstances of the case are unusual, to say the least. The Mother has absconded with the child, originally to (country omitted), but it is now believed that they are in (country omitted). Orders have been made by this Court that:

    a)the child should live with the Father;

    b)a Recovery Order should issue for the child to be delivered to the Father; and

    c)a warrant is to issue for the Mother’s arrest.   

Background

  1. The facts are more fully set out in the decision of this Court made on 9th April 2015[1],…

Continue reading DUCKETT & ROBINSON

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Duckett and Robinson [2015] FCCA 2275
Case
[2015] FCCA 2275
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Duckett & Robinson*, heard by Judge Scarlett, the applicant sought and was granted leave to proceed ex parte. The core of the dispute involved an application to stay an administrative assessment of child support concerning a child named X, born in 2011, and to restrain the collection and disbursement of ongoing payments and any outstanding arrears related to that assessment.

The court was required to determine whether to grant the applicant's request for an ex parte order, which would allow the proceedings to continue without the respondent being present or notified. Furthermore, the court had to consider the merits of staying the child support assessment and collection, and restraining the Child Support Registrar from disbursing funds held under that assessment.

Judge Scarlett granted the application, ordering that the administrative assessment of child support be stayed. The collection of ongoing payments and any arrears was also stayed, as was any action by the Child Support Registrar to disburse money held in relation to the assessment. The applicant was ordered to serve a sealed copy of these orders on the Child Support Registrar within seven days, and the applicant's costs were reserved.

Orders

Orders of the court

UNTIL FURTHER ORDER

1.

The Applicant is granted leave to proceed ex parte.

2.

The administrative assessment of child support no. (omitted) is stayed in respect of the child X born (omitted) 2011.

3.

The collection of ongoing payments of child support and any outstanding arrears of child support in respect of the above administrative assessment is stayed.

4.

The Child Support Registrar is restrained from taking any action to disburse any money currently being held by the Registrar in respect of the above administrative assessment is stayed.

5.

The Applicant is to serve a sealed copy of these Orders upon the Child Support Registrar within seven (7) days.

6.

The Applicant’s costs of this Application are reserved.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.