FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| DUARTE & MORSE | [2017] FamCA 350 |
| FAMILY LAW – INTERIM – Discharge of the Independent Children's Lawyer – Application for writ of Certiorari – Whether the Court has jurisdiction to issue writ of Certiorari – Whether the Court should restore previous Interim parenting orders – Whether the Court should strike out Filed Form 4 documents |
Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163
JB & BW (Application to extend time for Appeal) [2010] FamCAFA 144
McNamara & Rose [2007] FamCA 529
Re K (1994) FLC 92-461
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Duarte |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Morse |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Hamish Cumming Family Lawyers |
| FILE NUMBER: | SYC | 737 | of | 2014 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 16 May 2017 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Parramatta |
| PLACE HEARD: | Sydney |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Le Poer Trench J |
| HEARING DATE: | 3 March 2016, 6 December 2016, 27 April 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Othen |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Slater & Gordon Lawyers |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | In person |
| COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER : | Ms Shae |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN'S LAWYER : | Hamish Cumming Family Lawyers |
Orders
The appointment of the Independent Children's Lawyer is hereby discharged.
The mother’s Application in a Case filed 11 November 2015 and that filed 1 October 2014 is dismissed.
The mother’s Application in a Case filed 11 December 2014 is dismissed.
Should the final hearing of the parenting matters not proceed as scheduled on 26 June 2017, the mother has leave to renew any application for interim parenting orders she may seek.
I reserve each party’s costs of the determination of the mother’s applications set out above.
I reserve the right of the Independent Children's Lawyer to seek an order for costs incurred in acting as Independent Children's Lawyer during the period of the appointment. The Independent Children's Lawyer is to make any such application no later than 28 days after the conclusion of the parenting case listed to commence on 26 June 2017.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Duarte & Morse has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT |
FILE NUMBER: SYC 737/2014
| Ms Duarte |
Applicant
And
| Mr Morse |
Respondent
And
Independent Children's Lawyer
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This determination addresses applications made by the mother Ms Duarte. The orders sought are as follows:-
a)An Application in a Case filed 11 November 2015 (order 5 as sought in that application);
b)An Application in a Case filed 1 October 2014 (order 5 as sought); and
c)An Application…
Continue reading Duarte and Morse
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Duarte and Morse [2017] FamCA 350
- Case
- [2017] FamCA 350
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine the mother's applications, which had been brought before the court. The court also considered the role and costs associated with the Independent Children's Lawyer appointed to the proceedings.
Le Poer Trench J discharged the appointment of the Independent Children's Lawyer and dismissed the mother's applications filed on 11 November 2015, 1 October 2014, and 11 December 2014. The court granted the mother leave to renew any application for interim parenting orders if the final hearing, scheduled for 26 June 2017, did not proceed as planned. Costs for the determination of the mother's applications were reserved for each party, and the Independent Children's Lawyer was granted leave to seek costs incurred during their appointment, to be filed within 28 days of the conclusion of the parenting case.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The appointment of the Independent Children's Lawyer is hereby discharged.
2.
The mother’s Application in a Case filed 11 November 2015 and that filed 1 October 2014 is dismissed.
3.
The mother’s Application in a Case filed 11 December 2014 is dismissed.
4.
Should the final hearing of the parenting matters not proceed as scheduled on 26 June 2017, the mother has leave to renew any application for interim parenting orders she may seek.
5.
I reserve each party’s costs of the determination of the mother’s applications set out above.
6.
I reserve the right of the Independent Children's Lawyer to seek an order for costs incurred in acting as Independent Children's Lawyer during the period of the appointment. The Independent Children's Lawyer is to make any such application no later than 28 days after the conclusion of the parenting case listed to commence on 26 June 2017.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.