DRUMMOND & ANOR
v
GORDIAN RUNOFF LIMITED ACN 052 179 647
[2025] HCADisp 54
S140/2024
The applicants seek special leave to appeal from the whole of the majority judgment of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Stern JA, Mitchelmore JA agreeing, White JA dissenting), which dismissed an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Rees J).
The proposed appeal has insufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave.
Special leave to appeal is refused with costs.
Gageler CJ
Gordon J
Edelman J
Steward J
Gleeson J
Jagot J
Beech-Jones J
6 March 2025
- AGLC
- Drummond & Anor v Gordian Runoff Limited ACN 052 179 647 [2025] HCADisp 54
- Case
- [2025] HCADisp 54
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the Court of Appeal had correctly interpreted the relevant statutory provisions and whether the trial judge had properly exercised his discretion in reaching the decision that he did. The applicants argued that there were errors in the Court of Appeal's interpretation of the law and in the exercise of judicial discretion. They contended that these errors were significant enough to warrant a re-evaluation of the case.
The court found that the proposed appeal did not have sufficient prospects of success to justify granting special leave. The court considered the arguments presented by the applicants and concluded that the Court of Appeal's judgment was sound and that there were no grounds for overturning it. The court held that the applicants had not demonstrated that the appeal had a real chance of succeeding. Accordingly, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed, and the costs of the application were awarded against the applicants.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.