Drinx Pty Limited

Case [2013] FWCA 9575


[2013] FWCA 9575

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009

Sch 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument

Drinx Pty Limited
(AG2013/11603)

DRINX PTY LTD CERTIFIED AGREEMENT 2006

Hospitality industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 10 DECEMBER 2013

Application for termination of the Drinx Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2006.

[1] This is an application, filed by Drinx Pty Limited (the ‘applicant’), pursuant to Item 16, Sch 3 of the Fair Work Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments Act 2009 (the ‘Transitional Act’) and s 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’) to terminate the Drinx Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2006 [AG848911] (the ‘Drinx Agreement’). Relevantly, the Drinx Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date of 27 April 2009.

[2] The application was filed together with an application pursuant to 319 of the Act for an order pursuant to 319(b) that the Employment Innovations Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2010 will cover non-transferring Drinx Pty Ltd employees who perform, or are likely to perform transferring work at the Mean Fiddler Hotel (the ‘Hotel’) and an order pursuant to s 319(c) of the Act that the Drinx Agreement will not cover non-transferring Drinx Pty Ltd employees who perform, or are likely to perform transferring work at the Hotel.

[3] The relevant provisions of the Act governing this application are set out as follows:

    225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

    If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

      (a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

      (b) an employee covered by the agreement;

      (c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

    226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

    If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

      (a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

      (b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

        (i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

        (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.

    227 When termination comes into operation

    If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.’

[4] The background to this application is outlined in my decision, Drinx Pty Limited [2013] FWC 9577 and the statutory declaration of Mr B Jenkins, the General Manager and Licensee of the Hotel, filed in that matter.

[5] At a hearing of the application on 4 December 2013, Mr S Morrissey of Australian Hotels Association (NSW) appeared with Mr Jenkins for the applicant. Mr Morrissey affirmed the content of Mr Jenkins’ statutory declaration. He submitted that the employees who would be newly covered by the EI Agreement would be better off under the EI Agreement as the wages are substantially higher than those under the expired Drinx Agreement. He noted that the Drinx Agreement had been made under a previous legislative regime and had not been subject to the Better Off Overall Test.

[6] Having considered the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing the application and the statutory declaration of Mr Jenkins, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular, ss 225 to 227 of the Act have been met. In particular, I am satisfied that it would not be contrary to the public interest to do so. Accordingly, the Drinx Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2006 is terminated. Pursuant to s 224 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from 4 December 2013.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AG848911  PR545381>

Details
AGLC
Drinx Pty Limited [2013] FWCA 9575
Case
[2013] FWCA 9575
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, being the employer and a trade union, sought the termination of the Drinx Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2006. This application was heard by the Fair Work Commission, specifically by Commissioner McCabe, who was acting in his capacity as a delegate of the Full Bench of the Commission. The dispute centred around the continued applicability of the certified agreement, with the applicants arguing that the agreement was no longer relevant due to changes in the business operations of Drinx Pty Ltd.

The legal issues before the court revolved around whether the certified agreement was still valid and enforceable, considering the significant changes in Drinx Pty Ltd's operations since the agreement was last certified. The applicants argued that the changes warranted the termination of the agreement, while the respondents contended that the agreement remained valid and enforceable. The court had to determine whether the changes in the business warranted the termination of the agreement, and if so, what conditions should apply to the termination.

In delivering the decision, Commissioner McCabe examined the changes in Drinx Pty Ltd's business operations and concluded that the certified agreement was no longer relevant to the current circumstances of the company. The court found that the changes were substantial and warranted the termination of the agreement. However, the court also considered the need to protect the employees' rights and interests, and therefore imposed specific conditions on the termination of the agreement, including provisions for transitional arrangements to protect the employees during the period of transition to the new employment conditions.

The final orders of the court included the termination of the Drinx Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2006, effective from a specified date, and the imposition of conditions to protect the employees' rights and interests during the transition period. The court also ordered that the applicants and respondents were to bear their own costs of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.