| [2022] FWC 925 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy
Drew Clarke
v
Gardner Denver Industries Pty Ltd T/A Gardner Denver
(U2022/3855)
| COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 22 APRIL 2022 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – incomplete application – dismissal under s.587 at the Commission’s initiative.
On 1 April 2022 Mr Drew Clarke made an application to the Fair Work Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
The application was incomplete in that Mr Clarke did not pay the required fee or file a completed waiver form.
On 1 April 2022 the Commission attempted to contact Mr Clarke on his nominated telephone number to discuss payment of the required fee however, Mr Clarke did not answer the call. A voicemail message was left requesting that he contact the Commission to make payment.
Later that day, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Clarke’s nominated email address advising that his application required payment of the filing fee or a completed waiver form if he wished to proceed with the application. That correspondence also warned that if payment was not made or a waiver form was not received within 14 days, the application may be dismissed.
A final attempt to contact Mr Clarke was made by the Commission on 13 April 2022 to obtain payment or a completed waiver form. The call was not answered and a voicemail message was left advising Mr Clarke that payment of the required fee was still outstanding, and if left unpaid, the matter may be dismissed.
To date there has been no response from Mr Clarke, the required fee has not been paid and a completed waiver form has not been received.
Section 395 of the FW Act, which deals with application fees, provides as follows:
395 Application fees
(1) An application to the FWC under this Division must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(2) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under this Division; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or refunded.
Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospect of success.
Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied that as the application was not accompanied by the fee prescribed by the FW Act, the application was not made in accordance with the FW Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the FW Act. An order[1] to this effect will be issued with this decision.
COMMISSIONER
[1] PR740576.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR740574>
- AGLC
- Drew Clarke v Gardner Denver Industries Pty Ltd T/A Gardner Denver [2022] FWC 925
- Case
- [2022] FWC 925
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether Clarke's application complied with the requirements of the FW Act. The Commission had to determine if the application was made in accordance with the Act, particularly whether it was accompanied by the necessary fee or a completed waiver form. Given the statutory requirement for fees and Clarke's failure to either pay the fee or provide a waiver, the Commission had to decide whether to dismiss the application under section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act for non-compliance. The Commission concluded that the application did not meet the statutory requirements, leading to its dismissal.
The Commission found that Clarke's application did not comply with the FW Act as it was not accompanied by the required fee or a completed waiver form. Despite multiple attempts by the Commission to contact Clarke to resolve the issue of the unpaid fee, Clarke did not respond. Consequently, the application was dismissed under section 587(1)(a) of the FW Act, which permits the dismissal of an application if it is not made in accordance with the Act. An order to this effect was issued by the Commission.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.