Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

Case

[2001] FCA 94

29 JANUARY 2001


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[2001] FCA 94

OLGA DRANICHNIKOV v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND MS RYNEETE GAULT in her capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs AND MR KEVIN DUFFY in his capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

Q 89 of 2000

DOWSETT J
29 JANUARY 2001
BRISBANE

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 89 OF 2000

BETWEEN:

OLGA DRANICHNIKOV
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT

MS RYNEETE GAULT in her capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
SECOND RESPONDENT

MR KEVIN DUFFY in his capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
THIRD RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE OF ORDER:

29 JANUARY 2001

WHERE MADE:

BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.        The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of the proceedings.

Note:    Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY

Q 89 OF 2000

BETWEEN:

OLGA DRANICHNIKOV
APPLICANT

AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT

MS RYNEETE GAULT in her capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
SECOND RESPONDENT

MR KEVIN DUFFY in his capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
THIRD RESPONDENT

JUDGE:

DOWSETT J

DATE:

29 JANUARY 2001

PLACE:

BRISBANE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. There is no reason why costs should not follow the event.  I order that the applicant pay the respondent’s costs of the proceedings.  As to the impecuniosity of the applicant, that is a matter which may or may not be treated as relevant by the Minister in determining whether or not to enforce the order.

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett.

Associate:

Dated:             15 February 2001

The Applicant appeared in person.
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr J Bishop, Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing: 29 January 2001
Date of Judgment: 29 January 2001
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0