[2015] FWCA 1656
The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 12 March 2015.
The title has been corrected.
Associate to Commissioner Roe
Dated 18 March 2015
| [2015] FWCA 1656 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Drake Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2015/441)
DRAKE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT (VICTORIA) 2015
Storage services | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 12 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the Drake Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Victoria) 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as theDrake Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Victoria) 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Drake Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer however taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 19 March 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 18 March 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE412970 PR561842>
- AGLC
- Drake Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 1656
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1656
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the proposed enterprise agreement was sufficiently in the employees' interests and whether it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. In particular, the court had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including provisions on wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The court was also required to assess whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the parties and whether it contained appropriate measures to protect employees' rights and interests.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the proposed enterprise agreement was in the employees' interests and complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties, including submissions on the fairness and reasonableness of the proposed terms and conditions of employment. The court also examined the negotiation process and found that it had been genuinely conducted between the parties. The court determined that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including provisions on wages, hours of work, leave entitlements, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The court approved the proposed enterprise agreement, subject to certain modifications to address minor procedural issues.
The final orders of the court included the approval of the Drake Australia Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement (Victoria) 2015, subject to the modifications made by the court. The court also directed the parties to take certain steps to ensure that the agreement was properly communicated to the employees and that any necessary changes to their employment contracts were made. The decision of the Fair Work Commission was binding on both parties and could not be appealed except on limited grounds.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.