-
R v O'Toole
[2022] NSWDC 232
Citation 1
(Para 41)
…ve further recognised additional hardships, including that work opportunities during the pandemic, when available at all, are limited: DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343 at [36]-[39].…
-
R v Dobbs
[2022] NSWDC 129
Citation 2
(Para 50)
…ve further recognised additional hardships, including that work opportunities during the pandemic, when available at all, are limited: DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343 at [36]-[39].…
-
R v Rosenow
[2022] NSWDC 126
Citation 3
(Para 42)
…th have further recognised additional hardships, including work opportunities during the pandemic, when available at all, are limited: DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343 at [36]-[39].…
-
R v Stacker
[2020] ACTCA 34
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…The respondent also drew the Court’s attention to the recent sentence of DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343 at [36] in which Lyon JA stated that a custodial sentence would be more difficult as a result of the restrictions associated with the pandemic in that jurisdiction. The respondent conceded that detainees of the…
-
R v Farah; R v Boustani
[2020] NSWDC 192
Citation 5
(Para 95)
…In DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343, the current COVID-19 pandemic was taken into account for two reasons. Firstly, there had been a suspension of face-to-face visits. Secondly, the offender had reduced opportunity for work and meaningful occupation in custody. These factors were taken into account as adding to the…
-
WRT v The State of Western Australia
[2020] WASCA 68
Citation 6
(Para 6)
…erring to Brown (aka Davis) v The Queen [2020] VSCA 60 [48]; R v Madex [2020] VSC 145 [51] - [52]; Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v Tennison [2020] VCC 343 [36] - [37]; Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Politopoulos [2020] VCC 338 [75] - [77]; Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) v Morey (a pseudony…
-
R v Mostafa Dib
[2020] NSWDC 145
Citation 7
(Para 170)
…In DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343, the current COVID-19 pandemic was taken into account for two reasons. Firstly, there had been a suspension of face-to-face visits. Secondly, the offender had reduced opportunity for work and meaningful occupation in custody. These factors were taken into account as adding to the…
-
R v Lorenzo Fiordelli
[2020] NSWDC 154
Citation 8
(Para 117)
…In DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343, the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic was taken into account in two ways. Firstly, there had been a suspension of personal visits. Secondly, the offender’s opportunity to work and occupy himself meaningfully in prison had been reduced. These factors were taken into account as addin…
-
Psaila v Johnson
[2025] VCC 606
Citation 9
…e Queen [2017] VSCA 118; DPP v Fucile (2013) 229 A Crim R 427; The Queen v Talia [2009] VSCA 260; Rezai v The Queen [2020] VSCA 106; DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343; DPP v Ramirez [2016] VCC 1972; DPP v Ikiz [2019] VCC 2146; Gibbling v Page [2024] VMC 10; Boulton v The Queen [2014] 342; Wakim v The Queen [2016] VSC…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Davidson
[2024] VCC 1512
Citation 10
…DPP v Riley [2023] VCC 77; DPP v Fern [2021] VCC 1950; DPP v Plucke [2018] VCC 1085; Rezai v The Queen [2020] VSCA 106; DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343; R v Mills [1998] 4 VR 235; Boulton v R [2014] VSCA 342; Perry v The King [2023] VSCA 218 Sentence: 2 year CCO – s 6AAA declaration – Imprisonment for 9 months…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dang
[2022] VCC 1720
Citation 11
…anh Van Nguyen v R [2019] VSCA 134; Hieu Tran Dang v R [2020] VSCA 24; Worboyes v R [2021] VSCA 169; Le v R [2021] VSCA 220; DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343; Sentence:Total effective sentences of 2 years 6 months imprisonment; non-parole period of 1 year 8 months imprisonment; 377 days of pre-sentenced detention ad…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Dow
[2020] VCC 1605
Citation 12
(Para 36)
…[5] DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343 at [36]…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Rossi
[2020] VCC 1471
Citation 13
…2; Dyason v The Queen [2015] VSCA 210; R v Madex [2020] VSC 145; Brown v The Queen [2020] VSCA 60; Director of Public Prosecutions v Tennison [2020] VCC 343 Sentence: Total effective sentence of four years and six months’ imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years and four months. Section 6AAA declaration…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Diing
[2020] VCC 1003
Citation 14
…(a)An offender is a higher risk of contracting COVID‑19 if they are incarcerated. Reference was made to DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343 [36]. (b)The pandemic is causing additional stress and concern for prisoners and their families, as it is for every member of the community. Reference was made to Brown ( op cit )…
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v Horne
[2020] VCC 954
Citation 15
…refully in deciding the type of sentence I must impose.[4] [4] R v Madex [2020] VSC 145, [52]; Brown v The Queen [2020] VSCA 60, [48]; DPP v Tennison [2020] VCC 343, [36]. 47The prosecution submitted that a disposition without immediate custody was not available in the proper exercise of my sentencing discretion,…