DPP v Huynh
[2019] VCC 127
•14 February 2019
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA Revised
Not Restricted Suitable for Publication
AT MELBOURNE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CR 17-02426
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
v
TOAN HUYNH
---
JUDGE: HER HONOUR JUDGE GAYNOR
WHERE HELD: Melbourne
DATE OF HEARING:
DATE OF SENTENCE: 14 February 2019 CASE MAY BE CITED AS: DPP v Huynh MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2019] VCC 127
Subject: Catchwords: Legislation Cited: Cases Cited: Sentence:
REASONS FOR SENTENCE
---
---
APPEARANCES: Counsel Solicitors
For the Director of Public Prosecutions
Ms Mendicino
For the Accused Mr C Hooper
VICTORIAN GOVERNMENT REPORTING SERVICE
7/436 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne Vic 3000 - Telephone 9603 9134 196645
HER HONOUR:
1Toan Hian Huynh, you have pleaded guilty before me to one charge of dealing with money reasonably suspected of being the proceeds of crime, contrary to sub-section 400.9(1) of the Commonwealth Criminal Code. I annex the very full prosecution opening as an exhibit to these sentencing remarks.
2In short compass, the facts underlying your offending are as follows.
On 2 September 2016, you with your-accused Phroan Nguyen were apprehended at Broadmeadows train station in possession of $496,390 in cash which was carried by you in a wheelie suitcase. You and Ms Nguyen had flown to Sydney the day before, there collecting the cash from an unknown person at a domestic residence before boarding a train and travelling overnight back down to Broadmeadows train station where you were intercepted by police. It is not disputed that the money in the suitcase was reasonably suspected as being the proceeds of crime.
3During the Australian Federal Police investigation via telephone intercepts, it was revealed that Ms Nguyen was regularly dealing large sums of cash to different people in and around Melbourne, and that she was involved in a Vietnam-based service that was facilitating the transfer of money from Vietnam to Australia.
4This business was operated by a customer providing money to members of the business in Vietnam, and for a fee an equivalent amount of Australian cash would be delivered to a nominated person in Australia - her role being to deliver that currency. She did this both by delivering the cash and depositing it into bank accounts.
5Between 15 March and 31 August 2016, she was a party to or caused another party to deposit cash into at least 27 bank accounts belonging to at least
22 people, the aggregate amount of these cash deposits being at least
$1,742,575. And on 6 July 2016 she organised the hand delivery of $300,000
in cash to a client. Also involved was her boyfriend, one Vu Son Le, who on 21 June 2016 delivered $100,000 in cash to an undercover operative in a car park in Fitzroy.
6In order to assist with the deliveries of the cash, and in particular, to assist in depositing cash into bank accounts, Ms Nguyen would enlist the service of associates - one of whom was you. There was intercepted material and conversations between you and Ms Nguyen showing that between 25 and 30 August, you and she attended separately together at multiple bank branches in Footscray, Ascot Vale, Moonee Ponds, Maribyrnong and other western suburbs making multiple cash deposits.
7Insofar as this offence is concerned, in one telephone conversation Ms Nguyen told you about the details of the trip to Sydney, saying that after arriving you would sit and play with her sister, collect the goods and leave straight away. And in another call she asked if you would transfer $6,000 to someone's bank account on her behalf, after which when they brought they goods back, she would pay you back. She gave you details of booking the flight to Sydney, she purchasing flights for both her and you, and indeed, you made that trip.
8When intercepted by police, you were pulling behind you a purple suitcase.
You were in company with Ms Nguyen. The suitcase was locked with a padlock, both of you saying you did not have keys to the lock when police asked. An amount of $496,390 was found and the two of you were taken back to Spencer Street where a record of interview was conducted. The keys to the padlock were found in Ms Nguyen's backpack.
9In that record of interview conducted on 2 September 2016, you were reasonably cooperative with police. You said you were going to be paid around about $300, that Ms Nguyen was a close friend of yours, that you wanted to help her, admitted flying to Sydney, receiving the money, that you had removed it from one bag and put it into the purple bag, and that you thought that it was
"really a lot."
10You told police you knew the suitcase held a lot of money in it and that you lied to police when you told them you did not know what was in the bag, that you did this because you knew that what you were doing was illegal, and that you thought it was illegal because there was a lot of money in the bag.
11You said you were helping, and that you knew that Ms Nguyen worked by transferring money from Vietnam to Australia for people, that you thought she did this for a living, that you thought she did it for a lot of people. You said that you had worked for her in the past by depositing amounts of about $7,000 into customer's bank accounts on 15 or 20 occasions, and you were paid $17 for each transfer, saying you did not know where she got the money from.
12You were committed for trial without a contested committal on 30 November 2017, and pleaded guilty at the final directions hearing on 6 July 2018.
13Both Ms Nguyen and Mr Li were sentenced by Her Honour Judge Quin on 8 May 2018. Ms Nguyen was sentenced for her dealings with money, as I said, involving more than $1.7 million dollars, receiving a sentence of 30 months to be released after 15 months on a recognisance to be of good behaviour for a period of two years. Mr Li was dealt with for dealing with moneys totalling almost $800,000 and was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment to be released after six months on entering into a recognisance to be of good behaviour for two years.
14I now turn to your personal circumstances. You are now 25, almost 26, and were about 23 at the time of this offending. You were born in Vietnam and have two older brothers as well as an 18-year-old sister. Your parents have a family business selling port.
15You completed Year 12 in Vietnam and went to university for two years before coming to Australia on a student visa in order to further your studies in
international business. You wanted to obtain stronger qualifications to enhance your career. You graduated in your business degree in 2016, then enrolled in a Master of Accounting where you are currently a full-time student.
16I received a letter from the Kaplan Business School confirming that you are enrolled as a full-time student in a Master of Accounting which you began in July 2017 and are expected to finish in June of this year.
17According to psychologist Tim Watson-Munro, whose report dated 19 July 2018, was tendered on the plea, you do not use illicit drugs and are a social drinker. You have had, however, long-standing symptoms of depression and anxiety arising from your difficulties in adjusting to your life in Australia. You spoke no English on your arrival here. You were still a teenager. You had very limited family support. You have an aunt with whom you lived, but you had no friends.
18According to Mr Watson-Munro, you were vulnerable to peer group dynamics.
You reported to him high levels of anxiety and difficulty in making friends. You had some study group friends at university, but you did not socialise with them, and told Mr Watson-Munro that Ms Nguyen was really the only friend that you had as you had known her from your school days. You told Mr Watson-Munro you were keen to return the favour of her friendship, which Mr Watson-Munro stated:
"appears to be relevant to his decision to assist her in relation to the current offending."
19You told Mr Watson-Munro that after arriving in Australia, you asked your mother on a number of occasions to allow you to transfer your studies to Singapore, where you had a brother studying, due to the levels of homesickness and accompanying depression and anxiety that you were experiencing.
20Apparently and unsurprisingly your mood deteriorated following your arrest. But
you have, to your credit, continued with your studies although it has been difficult for you to do so, and you have seen a general practitioner who has suggested placing you on antidepressant medication.
21Mr Watson-Munro administered the Beck Depression Inventory, the results indicating a severe and recurring depressive disorder. This would appear to be a mixture of the depression that you had felt since arriving in Australia and living a fairly lonely existence thereafter, those feelings being exacerbated by your involvement and then arrest in this serious offending.
22You have no prior convictions and there has been no subsequent offending.
23It was accepted by the prosecution that the previous activities that you had described as being involved with with Ms Nguyen were relevant for the purposes of context rather than being an aggravating feature. Indeed the Crown conceded that this was not an aggravating feature. Further, it was conceded by the Crown that you would have been surprised by the amount of money involved in the offending that has brought you here before this court.
24It is quite clear that the offending you have been involved in arose as a result of widespread, sophisticated offending by an organised crime entity. It is clear that those who become involved with the activities of such organisations are committing serious offending and can ordinarily expect only to be dealt with by way of a term of imprisonment to be immediately served. Indeed, it was the submission of the prosecution, quite understandably, that I should sentence you a term of imprisonment to be immediately served.
25However, in my view, there are particular circumstances which have led me to determine that this is not appropriate in your case.
26First, at the time of this offending, you were a youthful offender. You were a young man. You have no prior convictions. You come from a respectable family. And there has been a delay in the finalisation of these matters, partly
due to your determination at one stage to plead not guilty to these charges. Nevertheless, it is clear that there has been quite a degree of psychological suffering by you in the meantime. You have, however, continued with your studies and you have not gone on to re-offend.
27I do not regard you as a danger to the community. I accept that the offending in which you became involved was of short duration, was to some extent the result of your loneliness here and the friendship that you had with Ms Nguyen. There is no evidence of enrichment on your part, and I am satisfied that your involvement with her lay very largely in your own socially isolated situation in Australia.
28It is always difficult, and indeed a perilous exercise, for courts to engage in the exercise of making a determination about how you might have behaved in different circumstances, or an offender might have behaved in different circumstances. But I am reasonably satisfied that had you settled more happily in Australia and had your own group of friends, the likelihood of you being involved in any sort of criminal offending was indeed remote.
29Under the Commonwealth regime of sentencing, there is the capacity to impose a disposition which, in my view, marks the seriousness of this offending and pays appropriate heed to the need for general deterrence to play a dominant role in the sentencing exercise before this court, but at the same time takes into account particular mitigatory factors that might exist in an offender's case. I have already outlined those.
30I am satisfied that your relative youth and isolation, and clearly, as I have said, otherwise responsible and law-abiding background are very strong mitigatory factors in this case - which lead me to take what I concede to be an unusual course in cases of this kind involving serious offending of this kind which arise from, as I have said, sophisticated, entrenched, organised criminal offending.
31That disposition is the capacity to impose a sentence of imprisonment which
will, however, effectively be suspended upon you entering into a recognisance to be of good behaviour. In making this decision, I have had regard to a very complete compilation of relevant cases where courts have dealt with offenders for offending of this kind.
32As I have said, in all the circumstances, I am satisfied that I can appropriately deal with you by way of a term of imprisonment to be immediately served but ordering your release upon you entering into a recognisance to be of good behaviour.
33Could you stand up, please, sir?
34On the charge of dealing with proceeds of crime in excess of $100,000, you are sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment - but you are to be released upon being entered into a recognisance to be of good behaviour in the sum of $1,000 and to last for a period of two years.
35What that means, Mr Huynh, is that you will not be sent to gaol but you must sign a recognisance, or an agreement, to be of good behaviour for the next two years. If you remain out of trouble for the next two years, that will be the end of the matter. You can go on to finish your studies.
36But if you are involved in any offending in the next two years, in addition to any punishment you may receive for any further offending, you will be ordered to serve that 12 months' imprisonment and to pay the $1,000 that I have attached to the recognisance. Do you understand?
37You have been an extremely foolish young man. You are very lucky not to have been gaoled. You need to be extremely careful for the next two years. Thank you. Have a seat. I will just wait while the documentation is prepared.
38I should add that during the course of the plea, I specifically asked of the Crown whether the matters that I have referred to that arose in Mr Watson-Munro's
important, because it seems to me your personal circumstances were of significance in this case and had a particular role in my reaching the unusual decision that I have.
39Now, I do not have to do s.6AAA, do I? It is one of the delights of dealing with Commonwealth. I assume your instructor has gone out to prepare that, has he?
40MS MENDICINO: He has. I can make a phone call and see where he is?
41HER HONOUR: No, that is all right. We have got plenty of time. I will just sit here and we can sit here in uncomfortable silence until he returns. How is that? It is to be hoped that this prior does not affect his capacity to practice in the future, Mr Hooper.
42MR HOOPER: Yes. I was just thinking, I was hoping that my friend - I didn't raise it, Your Honour, now that I think about it, but I hope it will not affect his visa, but I suspect it might be - - -
43HER HONOUR: I do not think it will, but his practice - it might not help him in the future.
44MR HOOPER: No. He is aware of that, Your Honour, and I've taken him through that the best thing to hope for is a recognisance.
45HER HONOUR: It is better than gaol, isn't it?
46MR HOOPER: And the consequences of that are a matter for him.
47HER HONOUR: Yes. I thank counsel for their written submissions, too.
They were very, very thorough and made my job a lot easier, so thank you.
48COUNSEL: Thank you, Your Honour.
49MR HOOPER: I'll tell my boss.
50HER HONOUR: You can. You can say, "Judge Gaynor raved about my wonderful submissions. She said she has never seen anything better."
51MR HOOPER: So erudite in my research.
52HER HONOUR: Exactly. And you can do the same, Ms Mendicino. You can both go back and say, "She just raved about us both."
53MS MENDICINO: I don't have a boss.
54MR HOOPER: It's the beauty of the Bar, Your Honour. I'm jealous.
55HER HONOUR: Pardon?
56MR HOOPER: It's the beauty of the Bar, not having a boss, Your Honour. I'm jealous.
57HER HONOUR: I know. It is terrific, is it not?
58MR HOOPER: One day.
59HER HONOUR: Yes. Yes, you always have to be a bit careful reporting back to your instructing solicitor and painting yourself in rose-coloured glasses, in rose-coloured terms. Because there is always transcript, unfortunately. Thank you very much. I will hand you back that reference too. Thank you.
60MR HOOPER: Thank you, Your Honour.
61HER HONOUR: I can cross out the B, C, D and E Here?
62MS MENDICINO: Yes, Your Honour.
63HER HONOUR: And this order was issued because the court has sentenced Toan Hian Huynh to a term of 12 months' imprisonment. I just fill that in? Yes, all right.
64MS MENDICINO: Yes.
65HER HONOUR: Thank you. And it’s the 14th? All right, thank you very much.
We will just get you to sign that. We will just get you to sign this, please. Do you want to go down and - - -
66MR HOOPER: Perhaps if I could assist, Your Honour?
67HER HONOUR: Yes, thank you. I will hand you back the comparative cases, too. Just as a matter of interest, and I see the informants are in court, is it one of those sort of - you know those - I talk about those tree-lending things that sometimes come from Asian - - -
68INFORMANT 1: I think it's just straight-up - - -
69HER HONOUR: Bit bigger than that?
70INFORMANT 2: Evades the banks, Your Honour. They - - -
71HER HONOUR: Yes, yes. No, that is right. I know they do it on a smaller basis as well, and there are these crippling sort of interest rates that go with it. But yes. Just amazing. I wonder what $400,000 in cash actually looks like.
72INFORMANT 2: It's a lot.
73HER HONOUR: It is a lot. Did you have to count it?
74INFORMANT 2: It's a lot.
75HER HONOUR: Geez. You police are amazing.
76INFORMANT 2: In Victoria, we don't count money any more. We give it to a bank and they - - -
77HER HONOUR: Because what, they have got those machines, have they not?
It's extraordinary.
78INFORMANT 1: Especially underwhelming with the new polymer notes.
79HER HONOUR: Say that again?
80INFORMANT 1: It is quite underwhelming now with the new polymer notes.
It used to be better with the old paper notes.
81HER HONOUR: That is that crispy - - -
82INFORMANT 1: It compacts a lot more.
83HER HONOUR: Yes. No, I do remember years ago when I was practicing and appearing for somebody who was involved in that. It was just quite fascinating, and it had blue ink all over it as well, for some reason. Yes. The dye thing had come out.
84All right. Thank you very much. I thank counsel for their assistance. All the best, Mr Huynh. You just get your studies done. Are you going back home after you have finished?
85ACCUSED (through interpreter): Yes.
86HER HONOUR: Yes. Good. Good idea. Back home to Mum, I think.
Thank you very much.
87MR HOOPER: Thank you, Your Honour.
88HER HONOUR: Thank you. We will adjourn to 10.30 tomorrow morning.
Thank you.
- - -
NO. CR-17-02426
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA
AT MELBOURNE
THE QUEEN
-v-
TOAN HIEN HUYNH
SUMMARY OF PROSECUTION OPENING FOR PLEA
Date of document: Filed on behalf of: Prepared by:
Commonwealth Director of Public
Prosecutions
|
460 Lonsdale Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000
July 2018
The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions Solicitor's code :
Telephone: (03) 9605 4333
Direct: (03) 9605 4333
Reference: MC17100195C
1.Toan Hien HUYNH has pleaded guilty to dealing with money reasonably suspected of being the proceeds of crime valued at $100,000 or more, contrary to subsection 400 .9(1) of the Criminal Code (Cth).
Maximum Penalties
The maximum penalty for an offence against subsection 400.9{1) of the Criminal Code is 3 years imprisonment and/or a fine of 180 penalty units ($32,400).
Overview
On the 2nd of September 2016 the accused at the Broadmeadows train station was in possession of $496,390 in cash being carried by him in a suitcase . The accused and his co-accused Phuong Nguyen flew to Sydney together the day before, collected the cash from an unknown person at a domestic residence before travelling to Central Station, boarded a train and travelled overnight back down to Broadmeadows train station where they disembarked before being intercepted by police. The money in the suitcase is reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime.
As part of an investigation Australian Federal Police (AFP) investigators obtained telephone interception warrants for mobile phone services used by Phuong Nguyen and Vu Son Le. These Intercepted phone conversations and messages revealed that Nguyen was regularly delivering large sums of cash to different people in and around Melbourne. Phuong Do True Nguyen was involved in a Vietnam based service that was facilitating the transfer of money from Vietnam to Australia . The business operated by a customer providing money to members of the business in
Vietnam and, for a fee, an equivalent amount of Australian cash would be delivered to a nominated person here in Australia. Nguyen's role was to deliver the Australian currency .
She was both hand delivering the cash and depositing it into bank accounts.
Between 15th of March 2016 and the 3l't of August 2016 on at least 281 occasions Phuong Do True Nguyen was a party to, or caused another to be a party to, cash deposits into at least 27 bank accounts belonging to at least 22 people where the total deposited into the bank accounts over a one or two day period was more than $10,000 but each deposit was less than $10,000 and mostly between $5000 and $7500. The aggregate amount of these cash deposits was at least $1,742,575.
On 6 July 2016 Nguyen organised the hand-delivery of $300,000 in cash to a client.
On the 21st of June 2016 Le delivered $100,000 in cash an undercover operative in a car park at Footscray.
To make the deliveries of cash, particularly to assist in the depositing of cash into bank accounts, Nguyen would enlist the services of associates. One such person was the accused . Intercepted messages and conversation between Nguyen and the accused together with physical
surveillance and CCTV footage on the 25th and 30th of August evidence the accused and Nguyen attending separately and together multiple bank branches in Footscray and Ascot Vale, Moonee Ponds, Maribynong, Braybrook and Sunshine and making multiple cash deposits.
The offence
10.On the 31st of August 2016 in a series of Intercepted phone conversations between Nguyen's mobile service 0412416089 and the accused's service 0426456662 between, 12:16pm and 2:15pm they discuss buying tickets to fly to Sydney.
11.In one phone conversation 1 Nguyen tells Huynh the details of the trip to Sydney : she says that after they arrive in Sydney they will "sit and play with my sister for a bit, and then we collect the goods and leave straight away" . In another call2 that day she asks Huynh if he can transfer six thousand to someone's bank account on her behalf and that after they go "and bring the goods back" she'll pay him back. In a further call on the same day3 Nguyen tells Huynh that she is booking their flights to leave Melbourne at 10:15am and arrive in Sydney at 11:40am. She then tells him the plan is that they will"go to that girl's house ...we'll stay there until the afternoon ...at five or six o'clock or something in the afternoon, we two catch the train ."
12.Nguyen bought both Huynh and her flights to Sydney, using the names Lisa Nguyen and Harry Huynh, and their train tickets back . They flew up to Sydney on the morning of the pt of September 2016 on Jetstar flight JQ 508 scheduled to leave Melbourne at 10:15am.
13.At 12:02pm on the 1st of September Nguyen messages her boyfriend Vu Son Le to tell him she was in Sydney.
1 Page 2767- CSN 1156
2 Page 2773 - CSN 1159
3 Page 2775 - CSN 1160
14.On the evening of the 1st of September Nguyen called Le. During this conversation Nguyen says that they are going to get off the train at Broadmeadows.
15.The following morning at 6:30am police officers attended the Broadmeadows train station waiting for Nguyen and the accused to arrive. At about 6:55am the train pulled in and police saw Nguyen and Huynh get off the train together. Huynh had in his possession a purple suitcase that he was pulling behind him. Police intercepted them and conducted a search.
16.The purple suitcase was locked with a padlock. When police asked both Nguyen and Huynh if they had a key for the lock both denied they did. Police broke the lock and opened the suitcase.
17.Inside was a large amount of cash separated into two plastic bags. Inside one plastic bag was
$248,250 and in the other $248,140: a total of $496,390.
18.Both Nguyen and Huynh were arrested and taken to the Spencer Street Police Complex. At the station Nguyen's backpack was searched and inside the backpack were located keys to the padlock that had been securing the purple suitcase .
19.On 2 September 2016 at 2:03pm Huynh was interviewed by investigators. During that interview he said the following:
a.That two days ago Phuong Nguyen had contacted him and asked him to go to Sydney with her, that she said she would pay for him if he went and pay him "300 or something";
b.He was a close friend of hers and wanted to help her and he told her he would help her for free;
c.That he and Nguyen flew to Sydney. Once in Sydney they caught a taxi to a house that he thinks might have been Nguyen's cousin's house;
d.While there Nguyen went outside for a minute and when she came back she had the money in a country road bag;
e.Nguyen gave the money to the accused and told him to put the money into the purple suitcase ;
f.He moved the money from the country road bag into the purple bag;
g.He thought it was "really a lot";
h.They stayed at the house until nearly 6pm before travelling to Sydney Central Station, There they got on the train to travel back to Melbourne;
i. They travelled to the station where police got him. j . He was pulling the purple bag.
k.That he knew the suitcase held a lot of money in it;
I.That he lied to police when he told them he didn't know about the purple bag;
m.That he lied because he knew what he was doing was illegal and he thought it was illegal because it was a lot of money;
n.He didn't know whose money it was or where it came from;
o.He wasn't going to keep the money, that he was just helping Nguyen by carrying the money;
p.He knows the Phuong Nguyen works by transferring money from Vietnam to here for
people and that she charges less than the banks do to do it. He thinks she does this for a living and he thinks she does it for a lot of people.
q.That he has worked in the past month for Phuong Nguyen by depositing amounts of about 7000 into her customer's bank accounts on about 15 or 20 occasions. She would meet him and give him the money and the account number to deposit into.
r.He was paid $17 for each transfer.
s.He didn't know where she got the money from .
Plea of guilty
Huynh was committed for trial without a contested committal on 30 November 2017.
A trial was listed in the Melbourne County Court to commence 10 September 2018.
Huynh pleaded guilty at the final directions hearing on 6 July 2018.
Co-accused Sentences
Nguyen and Le were sentenced in the Melbourne County Court by her Honour Judge Quin on 8 May 2018.
Both pleaded guilty at the committal stage of the proceedings.
Nguyen received the following sentences:
| Charge No. | Offence | Facts | Sentence |
| 2 | Dealing with money reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime | $496,390 in cash located by police when she and Huynh were searched after disembarking from a train at the Broadmeadows Train Station. | 6 months imprisonment to commence 6 months before end of term imposed on charge 4 |
| 3 | Dealing with money reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime | $687,580 in cash located by police during a search of her apartment that she shared with her boyfriend and co-accused Le | 12 months imprisonment to commence 6 months before end of term imposed on charge 4 |
| 4 | Conducting transactions so as to avoid reporting requirements for threshold transactions | 281 structured bank deposits between the 15th of March 2016 and the 31st of August 2016 totaling $1,742,575 | 2 years imprisonment to commence 8 May 2018 |
| 5 | Dealing with money reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime | Nguyen organising the delivery of $300,000 in cash to another | 2 months imprisonment to commence 6 months before end of |
| I I | term imposed on charge 4 |
| Total Effective Sentence | 30 months imprisonment |
| Recognisance Release | After serving 15 months to be of good behavior for 2 years |
Le received the following sentences :
| Charge No. | Offence | Facts | Sentence |
| 1 | Dealing with money reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime | Delivering $100,000 cash to an undercover police officer | 1month imprisonment to commence 8 May 2018 |
| 3 | Dealing with money reasonably suspected of being proceeds of crime | $687,580 in cash located by police during a search of his and Nguyen's apartment | 12 months imprisonment to commence 8 May 2018 |
| Total Effective Sentence | 12 months imprisonment | ||
| Recognisance Release | After serving 6 months to be of good behavior for 2 years | ||
Criminal Record
The offender does not have a criminal record.
Pre-sentence Detention
There is no pre-sentence detention .
Ancillary Orders
There are no ancillary orders sought.
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions
July 2018
2
0
0