DPP v Glascott (Ruling no 2)

Case

[2008] VSC 241

14 May 2008


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA
CRIMINAL DIVISION Not Restricted

No. 1468 of 2007

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
v
JOHN THOMAS GLASCOTT

Ruling No. 2

JUDGE:

CUMMINS J

WHERE HELD:

Melbourne

DATE OF HEARING:

13 May 2008

DATE OF RULING:

14 May 2008

CASE MAY BE CITED AS:

DPP v Glascott (Ruling No. 2)

MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION:

[2008] VSC 241

---

Criminal law and procedure – murder – s.399(5)(b) Crimes Act 1958 not invoked.

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Director of Public Prosecutions Mr G. Horgan SC and
Ms S. Borg
Office of Public Prosecutions
For the Accused Mr R. Sarah Slades & Parsons

---

RULING NO.2

HIS HONOUR:

  1. Counsel, on the question of the invocation of s.399(5)(b) Crimes Act 1958, I have examined the transcript overnight. The relevant part is the cross-examination of Mr Antonicelli, p.291, lines 21 to 30.

  1. Subject to the benefit of counsel’s submissions, it seems plain to me that the questions there put and the answers there adduced are well within the ambit of s.399(5)(b). That is for the following three reasons: first, their nature and content; second, the parity of reason between one person obtaining a licence, namely Mr Antonicelli, and the other, namely Mr Glascott; and third, because the second personal pronoun "you" comprehends plural as well as singular. However, I would take considerable persuasion to, in the exercise of discretion, permit cross-examination of the accused on his prior convictions on the basis of the questions put at page 291. The breach was a breach but not an egregious breach and in my view the matter should be left there and nothing further said about it.

  1. So unless counsel want to persuade me otherwise I think we should put the matter behind us and proceed without any further reference to the consequences of s.399. 

  1. I say that now because there are other matters to be dealt with today and I did not want defence counsel distracted by this matter hanging over his head.  Unless Mr Horgan can persuade me otherwise I think we just should put the matter behind us.

---

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0