DP World Melbourne Limited

Case

[2016] FWCA 4571

14 JULY 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2016] FWCA 4571
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.210—Enterprise agreement

DP World Melbourne Limited
(AG2016/3657)

DP WORLD MELBOURNE (ETU) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Stevedoring industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON

MELBOURNE, 14 JULY 2016

Application for variation of the DP World Melbourne (ETU) Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made by DP World Melbourne Limited to vary the DP World Melbourne (ETU) Enterprise Agreement 2014(the agreement).The variations sought are attached to this Decision.

[2] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) has lodged an employee organisation declaration in support of the application.

[3] A listing was sent to all parties which noted that “In the absence of any person indicating they wish to be heard, the application for approval of the agreement will be determined in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) on the basis of the materials lodged with the Fair Work Commission to date”.

[4] No party indicated they wished to be heard.

[5] I am satisfied that the relevant requirements of s.210, s.211 and s.212 of the Act concerning this application for approval have been met. I approve the variations sought.

[6] The application is approved and a consolidated version of the agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision. In accordance with s.216 of the Act the variation will operate from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 August 2018.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE409858  PR582558>


Attachment A

DP World Melbourne (ETU) Enterprise Agreement 2014 (‘Agreement’)
Schedule of Variations

Original Agreement provision

Varied Agreement provision

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0