Downer EDI Rail Pty Ltd trading as EDI Rail

Case [2025] FWCA 3503


[2025] FWCA 3503

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Downer EDI Rail Pty Ltd trading as EDI Rail

(AG2025/2517)

DOWNER RAIL MARYBOROUGH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BUTLER

BRISBANE, 21 OCTOBER 2025

Application for approval of the Downer Rail Maryborough Enterprise Agreement 2025.

  1. Downer EDI Rail Pty Ltd (“the Employer”) has applied for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Downer Rail Maryborough Enterprise Agreement 2025 (“the Agreement”). The Application was made under section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Fair Work Act”). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

The Application

  1. A party’s application for the Commission’s approval of an enterprise agreement must be accompanied by a signed copy of that agreement.[1] A copy of an enterprise agreement is a signed copy only if it is signed by the employer covered by the agreement and at least 1 representative of the employees covered by the agreement, and it includes each signatory’s full name and address, and an explanation of their authority to sign.[2]

  1. The signatory for the employer has provided a slightly incomplete address. In an abundance of caution, and to the extent necessary to do so: I exercise the power in section 586 of the Fair Work Act,[3] under paragraph (a) and/or paragraph (b) of that section, to correct any error in the application, and/or waive any irregularity in the form or manner in which it has been made, arising out of the signatory’s failure to provide their state as part of their address.

Workplace delegates’ rights

  1. The Employer submits that the delegates rights clause at clause 31 of the Agreement is not less beneficial than clause 40A of the Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2020 (“the Award”). No bargaining representative contradicted this submission, and I accept it.  

The National Employment Standards

  1. Noting clause 5 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards (“NES”) in the Fair Work Act will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

The Better Off Overall Test

  1. I sought submissions as to whether employees listed in Appendix F of the Agreement, and first and second year adult apprentices, are better off overall. The employer submitted that they were, giving reasons. No bargaining representative disagreed.

  1. In light of the foregoing, and after having regard to the Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement as well as the application and declarations filed in this matter, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. Each of the following organisations, being a bargaining representative for the agreement, has given notice under section 183 of the Fair Work Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement:

“Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU);

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU); and

Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU)

  1. In accordance with subsection 201(2) of the Fair Work Act, and relying on the organisations’ declarations, I note that the Agreement covers each of those organisations.

Conclusion

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with section 54 of the Fair Work Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2027.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Fair Work Act 2009 s 185(2)(a).

[2] Fair Work Act 2009 s 185(5) and Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) r 2.06A.

[3] See Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (Q.)[2020] FWCFB 848, [128]-[129], applying CFMMEU v Griffiths Cranes Pty Ltd[2019] FWCFB 1717, [40]-[46].

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

< AE530820  PR792831>

Details
AGLC
Downer EDI Rail Pty Ltd trading as EDI Rail [2025] FWCA 3503
Case
[2025] FWCA 3503
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved Downer EDI Rail Pty Ltd trading as EDI Rail, which sought approval for the Downer Rail Maryborough Enterprise Agreement 2025. The application was lodged with the Fair Work Commission, which was required to determine whether the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval. The nature of the dispute centred around whether the agreement sufficiently balanced the rights and obligations of both employers and employees, particularly in relation to wages, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically sections 234 and 235, which mandate that enterprise agreements must be free from prohibited content, be in writing, and be made without coercion. The court also needed to consider whether the agreement promoted harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations as required under section 230 of the Act. Moreover, the court examined if the agreement allowed for the protection of employees’ rights and interests and whether it provided for fair and effective mechanisms for resolving disputes.

In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the Downer Rail Maryborough Enterprise Agreement 2025 met all the statutory requirements for approval. The commission held that the agreement was free from prohibited content and complied with the formal requirements of being in writing. The commission also determined that the agreement fostered cooperative and productive workplace relations, adequately protected employees' rights and interests, and included fair and effective dispute resolution mechanisms. Consequently, the court approved the agreement, recognising that it appropriately balanced the interests of both employers and employees while complying with the statutory framework.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.