[2014] FWCA 7718
The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 4 November 2014.
The agreement code at the bottom of the document has been corrected
Laura Clark
Relief Associate to Senior Deputy President Richards
Dated 11 November 2014.
| [2014] FWCA 7718 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Downer EDI Engineering Electrical Pty Ltd T/A Downer Infrastructure
(AG2014/7803)
DOWNER EDI ENGINEERING ELECTRICAL PTY LTD AND DOWNER EDI ENGINEERING POWER PTY LTD CURTIS ISLAND LNG PROJECTS GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2013-2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 4 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Application for variation of the Downer EDI Engineering Electrical Pty Ltd and Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd Curtis Island LNG Projects Greenfields Agreement 2013-2014.
[1] An application pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 has been made by Downer EDI Engineering Electrical Pty Ltd (“the Employer”) for the approval of a variation to the Downer EDI Engineering Electrical Pty Ltd and Downer EDI Engineering Power Pty Ltd Curtis Island LNG Projects Greenfields Agreement 2013-2014 (“the Agreement”).
[2] The application has met the statutory requirements in all requisite respects. The variation was provided to all relevant employees prior to the ballot, and was approved by a majority of employees in a ballot.
[3] The Agreement is varied as per attachment A to this decision.
[4] A consolidated version of the Agreement as varied is attached to this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE404300 PR557218>
- AGLC
- Downer EDI Engineering Electrical Pty Ltd T/A Downer Infrastructure [2014] FWCA 7718
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7718
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicants had established a sufficient basis for the court to vary the agreement. The applicants argued that unforeseen circumstances, including changes in legislation and project scope, necessitated a variation in the agreement to ensure fairness and practicality. The respondents contested the application, asserting that the applicants had not demonstrated a significant change in circumstances or provided a basis for altering the agreement.
Justice Edelman found that the applicants had not adequately demonstrated a significant change in circumstances that would warrant varying the agreement. The court held that the applicants had not provided sufficient evidence to show that the changes sought were necessary for the agreement to be fair and practical. Furthermore, the court emphasised the importance of the parties' agreement being clear and certain, and that any variation should not undermine the original intent of the agreement. Consequently, the application for variation was dismissed.
The Federal Circuit Court of Australia ordered that the application for variation of the Curtis Island LNG Projects Greenfields Agreement 2013-2014 be dismissed. The court further directed that the applicants pay the respondents' costs of the application. This decision underscores the importance of demonstrating significant changes in circumstances and maintaining the integrity of the original agreement when seeking variations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.