FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Downer Construction (PNG) Limited v Independent State of Papua New Guinea [2010] FCA 1327
Citation: Downer Construction (PNG) Limited v Independent State of Papua New Guinea [2010] FCA 1327 Parties: DOWNER CONSTRUCTION (PNG) LIMITED v THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA File number: QUD 411 of 2010 Judge: DOWSETT J Date of judgment: 14 October 2010 Date of hearing: 14 October 2010 Place: Brisbane Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: No Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 8 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr B O'Keefe QC Solicitor for the Applicant: Clayton Utz Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
QUD 411 of 2010
BETWEEN: DOWNER CONSTRUCTION (PNG) LIMITED
ApplicantAND: THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Respondent
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
14 OCTOBER 2010
WHERE MADE:
BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.As soon as reasonably practicable the applicant serve the respondent with:
(a)the form 5 application filed on 1 October 2010;
(b)the affidavit of Dale Stuart Brackin filed on 1 October 2010;
(c)the further affidavit of Dale Stuart Brackin read by leave and filed this day; and
(d)a copy of this order.
2.The applicant have leave, pursuant to Order 8 rule 3(1)(a) of the Federal Court Rules, to effect such service outside of Australia and in Papua New Guinea, in accordance with the laws of Papua New Guinea.
3.The matter be listed for hearing at Brisbane on Tuesday, 1 February 2011.
4.The respondent file and serve any affidavits upon which it proposes to rely in answer to the claim on or before 14 January 2011.
5.Costs be reserved.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
QUD 411 of 2010
BETWEEN: DOWNER CONSTRUCTION (PNG) LIMITED
ApplicantAND: THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA
Respondent
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE:
14 OCTOBER 2010
PLACE:
BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The applicant in this matter has applied for leave to serve the respondent, the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, outside of Australia pursuant to Order 8 of the Federal Court Rules.
I am satisfied that the Court has jurisdiction in these proceedings.
The proceedings are of a kind mentioned in O 8 r 2. In particular they fall within items 9 and 13, and, possibly, item 1 contained in the table in that rule.
I am satisfied that a prima facie case for the relief claimed has been made out.
I order that the form 5 application and supporting material be served accordingly, the supporting material comprising the affidavit of Dale Stuart Brackin read and filed by leave today, the affidavit of Dale Stuart Brackin filed on 1 October 2010 and read today, together with a copy of this order.
I order that the matter be listed for hearing at Brisbane on Tuesday, 1 February 2011.
I order that the applicant advise the respondent of the date fixed for hearing by the service of this order.
I order that the respondent file any affidavits upon which it proposes to rely in answer to the claim on or before 14 January 2011. Costs are reserved.
I certify that the preceding eight (8) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett. Associate:
Dated: 7 December 2010
- AGLC
- Downer Construction (PNG) Limited v Independent State of Papua New Guinea [2010] FCA 1327
- Case
- [2010] FCA 1327
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining whether the Independent State of Papua New Guinea was bound by the arbitral award issued against it and whether the Federal Court had jurisdiction to enforce that award. This required an examination of the terms of the CER Trade Agreement, specifically the provisions concerning arbitration and enforcement of arbitral awards, as well as the implications of sovereign immunity in the context of international arbitration.
The court found that the Independent State of Papua New Guinea was indeed bound by the arbitral award as per the provisions of the CER Trade Agreement. The CER Trade Agreement included provisions for arbitration and enforcement of awards, which were binding on the parties. The court also held that while sovereign immunity generally protects states from legal action, the specific provisions of the CER Trade Agreement limited this immunity in the context of the agreement. Consequently, the court concluded that it had jurisdiction to enforce the arbitral award against the Independent State of Papua New Guinea. The court made orders for the service of the relevant documents on the Independent State of Papua New Guinea and scheduled the matter for a hearing. Additionally, it mandated the respondent to file and serve any counter-affidavits by a specified date and reserved the issue of costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. As soon as reasonably practicable the applicant serve the respondent with:
(a) the form 5 application filed on 1 October 2010;
(b) the affidavit of Dale Stuart Brackin filed on 1 October 2010;
(c) the further affidavit of Dale Stuart Brackin read by leave and filed this day; and
(d) a copy of this order.
2. The applicant have leave, pursuant to Order 8 rule 3(1)(a) of the Federal Court Rules, to effect such service outside of Australia and in Papua New Guinea, in accordance with the laws of Papua New Guinea.
3. The matter be listed for hearing at Brisbane on Tuesday, 1 February 2011.
4. The respondent file and serve any affidavits upon which it proposes to rely in answer to the claim on or before 14 January 2011.
5. Costs be reserved.
Note:
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.