| [2015] FWCA 1628 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Doutta Galla Aged Services Ltd T/A Doutta Galla Aged Services
(AG2015/1792)
DOUTTA GALLA AGED SERVICES LTD, ANMF AND HSU ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Aged care industry | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 10 MARCH 2015 |
Application for approval of the Doutta Galla Aged Services Ltd, ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Doutta Galla Aged Services Ltd, ANMF and HSU Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Doutta Galla Aged Services Ltd (the Applicant).
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[3] The Australian Nursing & Midwifery Federation, being the bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement does not contain a consultation clause that meets the requirements of s.205(2) of the Act. Therefore, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 17 March 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE412950 PR561806>
- AGLC
- Doutta Galla Aged Services Ltd T/A Doutta Galla Aged Services [2015] FWCA 1628
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1628
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined the fairness of the agreement by considering whether it complied with the procedural and substantive fairness tests as stipulated by the Fair Work Act. The applicant argued that certain provisions of the agreement were unfair, particularly those relating to pay rates and conditions. The Commission needed to determine if these provisions were consistent with the Act and if the agreement had been fairly negotiated. The Commission also needed to consider whether any unfair provisions could be excised from the agreement without undermining its overall purpose and balance.
After reviewing the submissions and evidence presented by both parties, the Commission found that while some provisions of the agreement were indeed unfair, they could be excised without compromising the overall fairness or purpose of the agreement. The Commission was satisfied that the remaining provisions met the criteria for procedural and substantive fairness. The agreement was approved in its amended form, ensuring compliance with the Fair Work Act. The final orders included the approval of the amended enterprise agreement, with specific provisions removed to address the fairness concerns raised by the applicant.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.