FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Douglas v Racing Victoria Limited [2019] FCA 1745
Appeal from: Douglas v Racing Victoria Limited and Another [2019] FCCA 49 File number: VID 244 of 2019 Judge: ANASTASSIOU J Date of judgment: 1 October 2019 Catchwords:
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY - application for extension of time in which to bring appeal - whether delay attributed to misapprehension of appeal limitation period - claims of illness and financial hardship in obtaining representation – merits of appeal – extension of time granted
Legislation: Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) Cases cited: Douglas v Racing Victoria Limited and Another [2019] FCCA 49
Gallo v Dawson [1992] HCA 44; 66 ALJR 859; 109 ALR 319
SZTUR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1570
Date of hearing: 1 October 2019 Registry: Victoria Division: General Division National Practice Area: Intellectual Property Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs Number of paragraphs: 18 Counsel for the Applicant: Ms M. Barker and Mr N. Bird Solicitor for the Applicant: Ian Robertson Legal Counsel for the Respondents: Mr A. Bell Solicitor for the Respondents: Maddocks Lawyers ORDERS
VID 244 of 2019 BETWEEN: WILLIAM RODERICK DOUGLAS
Applicant
AND: RACING VICTORIA LIMITED (ACN 096 917 930)
First Respondent
DESIGN AWARDS PTY LTD
Second Respondent
JUDGE:
ANASTASSIOU J
DATE OF ORDER:
1 OCTOBER 2019
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The time for filing the Notice of Appeal be extended to 18 March 2019.
2.The matter be listed for mediation before a Registrar of the Court on a date to be fixed before 13 December 2019.
3.The appeal be listed for a case management conference on a date to be fixed after 13 December 2019.
4.The costs of this application be costs in the appeal.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Delivered ex temporeANASTASSIOU J:
This is an application for an extension of time in which to file a Notice of Appeal from the decision of the Federal Circuit Court in Douglas v Racing Victoria Limited and Another [2019] FCCA 49. The applicant was unsuccessful in his claim against the respondents for infringement of copyright and for breach of a Deed of Settlement and Release.
The applicant's claims concern two medals awarded annually to the leading jockey in the field of flat racing and jumps racing. The background to the claims is set out in detail by the primary judge in paragraphs [6] to [109] of his Honour's reasons.
The applicant was 32 days late in filing his Notice of Appeal and accordingly seeks an extension of time in which to file his Notice of Appeal pursuant to rule 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules. The principles applicable to granting such extensions are well known and were essentially common ground between the parties. In short compass they are:
(1)whether the applicant has provided an acceptable reason for the delay;
(2)whether the respondents would suffer any prejudice should an extension of time be granted; and
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Douglas v Racing Victoria Limited and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] FCA 1745
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues were whether the delay in filing the appeal was attributable to a genuine misunderstanding of the appeal period, and if the applicant's claims of illness and financial hardship were valid reasons for the extension of time. The court also had to assess the merits of the appeal itself and determine whether granting an extension would be in the interests of justice.
The court found that Douglas's delay in filing the appeal was due to a genuine misunderstanding of the appeal period, and that his claims of illness and financial hardship were credible. The court also considered the merits of the appeal, which were found to be potentially valid. Consequently, the court granted the extension of time for filing the Notice of Appeal, and ordered mediation and a case management conference to ensure that the matter progresses efficiently. The costs of the application were ordered to be costs in the appeal.
The court's orders included an extension of the time for filing the Notice of Appeal to 18 March 2019, a requirement for the matter to be listed for mediation before a Registrar of the Court on a date to be fixed before 13 December 2019, a listing for a case management conference after 13 December 2019, and that the costs of this application be costs in the appeal. These orders were made in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The time for filing the Notice of Appeal be extended to 18 March 2019.
2. The matter be listed for mediation before a Registrar of the Court on a date to be fixed before 13 December 2019.
3. The appeal be listed for a case management conference on a date to be fixed after 13 December 2019.
4. The costs of this application be costs in the appeal.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.