| CITATION: | Douglas v Chief Executive, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation [2011] QCAT 173 |
| PARTIES: | Mr Adam Brian Douglas |
| v | |
| Chief Executive, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation |
| APPLICATION NUMBER: | GAR333-10 |
| MATTER TYPE: | General administrative review matters |
| HEARING DATE: | 16 February 2011 |
| HEARD AT: | Brisbane |
| DECISION OF: | Margaret McLennan, Member |
| DELIVERED ON: | 16 February 2011 |
| DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
ORDERS MADE: | [1] The Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation’s decision is confirmed. [2] The application is dismissed. |
| CATCHWORDS: | Refusal of Security Officer and Crowd Controller licence – eligibility criteria – conviction of disqualifying offences Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009, s 72 |
APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
| APPLICANT: | No appearance |
| RESPONDENT: | Chief Executive, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation represented by Mr Peter Rashford |
REASONS FOR DECISION
Upon the applicant’s failure to appear at the compulsory conference, the applicant’s confirmation to the registry of receipt of the compulsory conference notification and the respondent’s consent, I make the following decision pursuant to section 72 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009.
I am satisfied that the applicant was properly refused in accordance with section 14 of the Security Providers Act 1993 (“the Act”) his application for a Security Officer (Unarmed) and Crowd Controller licence on the grounds that he is not an appropriate person to hold a licence.
The basis of the refusal is that the applicant was convicted of disqualifying offences within the preceding 10 years:
§Assaults occasioning bodily harm in company at the Brisbane District Court on 29 August 2002; and
§Enter dwelling with intent in the night in company with one or more persons at the Brisbane District Court on 29 August 2002.
The offences are offences against sections 339 and 421 of Chapters 30 and 39 of the Criminal Code Queensland. These Chapters are listed in the Schedule to the Act and therefore are disqualifying offences.
Section 11(2) of the Act provides the eligibility criteria for the grant of a licence and section 11(5) of the Act provides that a person is not an appropriate person to hold a licence if the person, within 10 years of applying for a licence, has been convicted of a disqualifying offence.
- AGLC
- Douglas v Chief Executive, Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation [2011] QCAT 173
- Case
- [2011] QCAT 173
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the Chief Executive's decision to refuse the licence application was lawful, focusing on whether Douglas's convictions indeed disqualified him from holding the licence. Douglas argued that the nature and recency of his convictions should not automatically disqualify him from obtaining the licence. The Tribunal examined the statutory criteria and the Chief Executive's discretion in assessing the application.
The Tribunal concluded that the Chief Executive's decision was lawful. It found that Douglas's convictions were of a disqualifying nature and sufficiently recent to warrant refusal of the licence. The Tribunal emphasised that the statutory criteria were to be strictly applied, and the Chief Executive had not acted beyond their powers in making the decision. Consequently, Douglas's application was dismissed, and the Department’s decision was upheld.
In addition to dismissing the application, the Tribunal confirmed the decision of the Chief Executive, leaving the refusal of the licence application intact. This means that Douglas remains ineligible to hold a Security Officer and Crowd Controller licence under the current statutory provisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
[1] The Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation’s decision is confirmed.
[2] The application is dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.