Donevski v Hunter

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

DONEVSKI

v

HUNTER & ORS

[2021] HCASL 215
M53/2021

  1. A substantial extension of time is necessary to enable this application for special leave to appeal to proceed. The appeal foreshadowed by the application for special leave to appeal has no prospect of success. The application for special leave to appeal should be refused. That being so, it would be futile to grant the required extension of time.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

P.A. Keane J.J. Edelman
11 November 2021
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Donevski v Hunter and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] HCASL 215
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Donevski v Hunter is a case before the High Court of Australia. The primary party involved is Donevski, who is appealing against the decision of the Supreme Court of South Australia, which dismissed his claim for damages against Hunter and others. The nature of the dispute revolves around the validity of a contract and the subsequent liability for breach of contract. The High Court was tasked with determining whether Donevski's application for special leave to appeal should be granted, allowing the appeal to proceed to a higher court.

The legal issues the court was required to decide included whether there were grounds for special leave to appeal and if the appeal had a prospect of success. The court had to examine the merits of the case, considering the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The central issue was whether the lower court's decision was correct in dismissing Donevski's claim and whether there were any significant legal errors that warranted a review by the High Court.

The court found that there were no substantial grounds for special leave to appeal. The reasoning provided by the court highlighted that the appeal had no prospect of success due to the strength of the lower court's decision and the lack of any substantial legal errors that would merit a review. The court concluded that granting the extension of time for the application to proceed would be futile, as the appeal was unlikely to succeed. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed, and the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order to that effect.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.