Donelan and Donelan (Child support) [2024] AATA 4121 (27 September 2024)
DIVISION:Social Services & Child Support Division
REVIEW NUMBERS: 2024/AC028030, 2024/AC028151 and 2024/AC028383
APPLICANT: Mr Donelan
OTHER PARTIES: Child Support Registrar
Mrs Donelan
TRIBUNAL:Senior Member S Trotter
DECISION DATE: 27 September 2024
DECISIONS:
2024/AC028030
Decision under review
The decision to revoke the existing percentage of care determinations of 14% to Mr Donelan and 86% to Mrs Donelan for [Child 1] and to record new percentage of care determinations of 11% to Mr Donelan and 89% to Mrs Donelan from 3 March 2023, with the new percentage of care of 11% for Mr Donelan applying from 3 March 2023 however with the new percentage of care of 89% for Mrs Donelan only applying from 22 September 2023.
Decision of the Tribunal
The Tribunal sets aside the decision under review and substitutes a new decision that there was no change in the care of [Child 1] and the existing percentage of care determinations of 14% to Mr Donelan and 86% to Mrs Donelan are not revoked.
2024/AC028151
Decision under review
The decision to revoke the existing percentage of care determinations of 14% to Mr Donelan and 86% to Mrs Donelan for [Child 2] and to record new percentage of care determinations of 6% to Mr Donelan and 94% to Mrs Donelan from 3 February 2023, with the new percentage of care of 6% for Mr Donelan applying from 3 February 2023 however with the new percentage of care of 94% for Mrs Donelan only applying from 22 August 2023.
Decision of the Tribunal
The decision under review is varied such that the existing percentage of care determinations of 14% to Mr Donelan and 86% to Mrs Donelan for [Child 2] are revoked with new percentage of care determinations of 8% to Mr Donelan and 92% to Mrs Donelan from 3 February 2023, with the new percentage of care of 8% for Mr Donelan applying from 3 February 2023 however with the new percentage of care of 92% for Mrs Donelan only applying from 22 August 2023.
2024/AC028383
Decision under review
There were no special circumstances preventing Mr Donelan from lodging his objection to the 23 October 2023 decision under review in relation to [Child 2] within 28 days of being notified of the decision.
Decision of the Tribunal
The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.
CATCHWORDS
CHILD SUPPORT – percentage of care – changes to the pattern of care – one new determination made – one existing percentage of care determination not revoked – special circumstances preventing lodging of the objection – decision under review set aside and substituted
Names used in all published decisions are pseudonyms. Any references appearing in square brackets indicate that information has been omitted from this decision and replaced with generic information so as not to identify involved individuals as required by subsections 16(2AB)-16(2AC) of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988.
REASONS FOR DECISION
BACKGROUND
This application relates to the care percentages recorded for…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Donelan and Donelan (Child support) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] AATA 4121
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether there were special circumstances that prevented Ms Donelan from lodging an objection to the Registrar's decision within the prescribed time limit. If such circumstances were found to exist, the Tribunal would then consider whether to set aside the Registrar's decision and substitute its own determination regarding the percentage of care.
The Tribunal found that Ms Donelan had indeed demonstrated special circumstances that prevented her from lodging her objection within the statutory timeframe. These circumstances related to her mental health and her inability to effectively engage with the objection process. Applying the principles of fairness and the need to ensure that parties have a proper opportunity to be heard, the Tribunal determined that it was appropriate to set aside the Registrar's decision.
Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the decision under review and substituted its own determination, effectively allowing Ms Donelan to proceed with her application to have the percentage of care arrangements reconsidered.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.