Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited

Case

[2009] FWA 493

13 NOVEMBER 2009

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2009] FWA 493


FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.248 - Application for a single interest employer authorisation

Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited
(B2009/10734)

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS

BRISBANE, 13 NOVEMBER 2009

Single interest employer authorisation – franchisees – flaws in original application - s.248 - multiple employers taken to be single interest employers in relation to the agreement – s.172(5)(c) – FWA discretion - authorisation not a static instrument.

[1] On 28 September 2009 Fair Work Australia (“FWA”) received an application by Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Limited (“the Applicant”) made pursuant to s.248 of the Fair Work Act2009 (“the FW Act”).  The Applicant seeks a single interest employer authorisation in respect of itself and 156 franchisees listed in the attached Schedule One (“the Franchisees”).

[2] Section 248 of the Act falls within Subdivision B of Part 2-4 of the Act, and is headed - Single interest employer authorisations. Section 248 reads relevantly for immediate purposes as follows:

    248 Single interest employer authorisations

    (1) Two or more employers may apply to FWA for an authorisation (a single interest employer authorisation) under section 249 in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement.

    Note: The effect of a single interest employer authorisation is that the employers are single interest employers in relation to the agreement (see paragraph 172(5)(c)).

    (2) The application must specify the following:

      (a) the employers that will be covered by the agreement;

      (b) the employees who will be covered by the agreement;

      (c) the person (if any) nominated by the employers to make applications under this Act if the authorisation is made.

[3] Section 172(5) of the Act states:

    “Single interest employers

    (5) Two or more employers are single interest employers if:

      (a) the employers are engaged in a joint venture or common enterprise; or

      (b) the employers are related bodies corporate; or

      (c) the employers are specified in a single interest employer authorisation that is in operation in relation to the proposed enterprise agreement concerned.” (My emphasis)

[4] Attached to the application were authorisation forms purportedly signed by each of the 156 Franchisees.

[5] However, the requirements of s.248(2)(a), (b) and (c) and s.249 of the FW Act were not satisfied upon the initial application being made because a number of the authorisation forms failed to:

    (a) properly identify the name of the Franchisee, or failed to do so with sufficient clarity;

    (b) include a complete copy of the authorisation form;

    (c) state the name of the authorised representative of the Franchisee, or failed to do so with sufficient clarity; or

    (d) include the title of the authorised representative of the Franchisee.

[6] Following discussions with the Applicant’s representative and a review of the full range of authorisation forms provided by the Franchisees, the application was appropriately amended (with the business identity of the Franchisees and the relevant authorisations subsequently clarified and re-filed on 10 November 2009).

[7] In light of this amended material, which explains the delay between this decision and the date of lodgement – I am now satisfied that the application meets the requirements of s.248(2)(a), (b) and (c) of the FW Act in that it specifies that:

    (a) the employers that will be covered by the agreement (with such employers being the Applicant and those specified in Schedule One) 1;

    (b) the employees who are to be covered by the agreement, who in each instance are the employees of the Applicant and each of the employers specified in Schedule One 2; and

    (c) the Applicant and the Franchisees nominated an authorised representative to make any future applications under the FW Act. 3

[8] Section 249 of the FW Act outlines when FWA must make a single interest employer authorisation, this section relevantly states:

    “(1) FWA must make a single interest employer authorisation in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement if:

      (a) an application for the authorisation has been made; and

      (b) FWA is satisfied that:

        (i) the employers that will be covered by the agreement have agreed to bargain together; and

        (ii) no person coerced, or threatened to coerce, any of the employers to agree to bargain together; and

      (c) the requirements of either subsection (2) (which deals with franchisees) or (3) (which deals with employers that may bargain together for a proposed enterprise agreement) are met.

    Franchisees

    (2) The requirements of this subsection are met if FWA is satisfied that the employers carry on similar business activities under the same franchise and are:

      (a) franchisees of the same franchisor; or

      (b) related bodies corporate of the same franchisor; or

      (c) any combination of the above.

    Employers that may bargain together for the agreement

    (3) The requirements of this subsection are met if FWA is satisfied that all of the employers are specified in a declaration made under section 247 in relation to the agreement.”

[9] As I mentioned above, the original application in many instances did not provide sufficient clarity as to the authenticity of the agreement on the part of the Franchisees to bargain together and to do so absent any coercion.

[10] The amended materials now supplied, however, have overcome these deficiencies. The preconditions for s.249(1)(a) and s.249(1)(b) of the FW Act, therefore, are now met in so far the application for the authorisation has been made, which has been cited above. 4

[11] The requirements for s.249(1)(c) of the FW Act, as cited above, are satisfied for the following reasons:

    (a) For the purposes of s.249(2)(a) of the FW Act requires that FWA be satisfied for the purposes of the application that the employers who are the subject of the application carry on similar business activities under the same franchise and franchisees of the same franchisor; and

    (b) The Application before me makes it clear by way of that the employers, franchisor and franchisees who are the subject of the application have the necessary relationships such that the requirements of s.249(2)(a) of the FW Act are satisfied.

[12] In view of these findings, I am satisfied I should make the order providing for the authorisation as sought by the application before me.

[13] I observe that the duration of the order at first instance that I make is regulated not by FWA’s discretion by virtue of the operation of s.249(4) of the FW Act, which reads as follows:

    “Operation of authorisation

    (4) The authorisation:

      (a) comes into operation on the day on which it is made; and

      (b) ceases to be in operation at the earlier of the following:

        (i) the day on which the enterprise agreement to which the authorisation relates is made;

        (ii) 12 months after the day on which the authorisation is made or, if the period is extended under section 252, at the end of that period.”

[14] Despite this, the period of operation of the authorisation may also be extended on application, if FWA is of the view that:

    • there is a the employer and employees who are the subject of the original authorisation have a reasonable prospect of making the agreement; and


    • it is appropriate in the circumstances, as FWA may decide as a matter of broad discretion, to extend the operative life of the authorisation.


[15] Section 252 of the Act so provides as follows:

    “252 Variation to extend period single interest employer authorisation is in operation

      (1) A bargaining representative for a proposed enterprise agreement to which a single interest employer authorisation relates may apply to FWA to vary the authorisation to extend the period for which the authorisation is in operation.

      (2) FWA may vary the authorisation to extend the period if FWA is satisfied that:

        (a) there are reasonable prospects that the agreement will be made if the authorisation is in operation for a longer period; and

        (b) it is appropriate in all the circumstances to extend the period.”

[16] There are no procedural matters in respect of s.250(1)(d) of the FW Act that are relevant to the authorisation that I will make.

[17] Section 250(2) of the FW Act states as follows:

    “Authorisation may relate to only some of employers or employees

    (2) If FWA is satisfied of the matters specified in subsection 249(2) or (3) (which deal with franchisees and employers that may bargain together for a proposed enterprise agreement) in relation to only some of the employers that will be covered by the agreement, FWA may make a single interest employer authorisation specifying those employers and their employees only.”

[18] There is nothing before me that leads me to believe that the necessary employer-franchisee-franchisor relationship as declared is inaccurate or improperly founded in respect of each of the employers who are to be covered by the order making for the authorisation that I will make.

[19] That said, the authorisation I will make by order is not a static instrument. Section 251 of the FW Act reads as follows:

    “251 Variation of single interest employer authorisations

    Variation to remove employer

    (1) An employer specified in a single interest employer authorisation in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement may apply to FWA for a variation of the authorisation to remove the employer’s name from the authorisation.

    (2) If an application is made under subsection (1), FWA must vary the authorisation to remove the employer’s name if FWA is satisfied that, because of a change in the employer’s circumstances, it is no longer appropriate for the employer to be specified in the authorisation.

    Variation to add employer

    (3) An employer that is not specified in a single interest employer authorisation may apply to FWA for a variation of the authorisation to add the employer’s name to the authorisation.

    (4) If an application is made under subsection (3), FWA must vary the authorisation to add the employer’s name if FWA is satisfied that:

      (a) each employer specified in the authorisation has agreed to the employer’s name being added; and

      (b) no person coerced, or threatened to coerce, the employer to make the application; and

      (c) the requirements of subsection 249(2) or (3) (which deal with franchisees and employers that may bargain together for a proposed enterprise agreement) are met.”

[20] Employers (and their employees) may be excised from the authorisation as their circumstances change.

[21] Further, new employers and their employees may be covered by the authorisation if:

    • they manifest the requisite relationship;


    • the employers who are already covered by the authorisation agree to the inclusion of the employer; and


    • the employer has not been coerced or otherwise into making the application


[22] Section 249(1) of the FW Act states that Fair Work Australia “must” make the single interest authorisation employer authorisation if it is satisfied of the various factual preconditions required to be established under s.249 of the FW Act. Those factual preconditions have been met in each instance, so I must now make the authorisation for which application has been made.

[23] Section 250 of the Act reads as follows:

    “(1) A single interest employer authorisation in relation to a proposed enterprise agreement must specify the following:

      (a) the employers that will be covered by the agreement;

      (b) the employees who will be covered by the agreement;

      (c) the person (if any) nominated by the employers to make applications under this Act if the authorisation is made;

      (d) any other matter prescribed by the procedural rules.”

[24] The single issue authorisation will specify, for purposes of s.250(1)(a) of the FW Act that the employers that will be covered by the agreement will be Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited and the Franchisees.

[25] The single issue authorisation will specify, for purposes of s.250(1)(b) of the FW Act that the employees that will be covered by the agreement will be:

    “Employees employed by the Franchisor or the Franchisees (excluding working directors and area managers, whatever called) who perform any or all of the duties listed below:

      (a) preparation, assembly, cooking or packing of product for sale;

      (b) maintenance of the work area at a standard of cleanliness as determined by the (b) Franchisee (or the Franchisor);

      (c) cleaning of cooking utensils, cutlery and glassware;

      (d) performance of customer service functions including the taking of orders by any means, and the entering of information onto a computer;

      (e) the receipt of monies or other duties involving customer contact except the delivery of product to the customer outside of the retail food establishment; or

      (f) the distribution or use of promotional material by any means.”

[26] The single interest authorisation will specify, for purposes of s.250(1)(c) of the FW Act that the person nominated by the employers to make applications under the FW Act is the Franchisor’s General Counsel and Company Secretary, Craig Anthony Ryan or any person who succeeds him in that position.

[27] For the purposes of s.250(1)(d) of the FW Act, there are no procedural rules prescribing any other matter(s) to which I need to attend.

[28] Section 249(4) of the FW Act reads:

    “Operation of authorisation

    (4) The authorisation:

      (a) comes into operation on the day on which it is made; and

      (b) ceases to be in operation at the earlier of the following:

        (i) the day on which the enterprise agreement to which the authorisation relates is made;

        (ii) 12 months after the day on which the authorisation is made or, if the period is extended under section 252, at the end of that period.”

[29] Because I am satisfied that the application has met the preconditions stipulated in the FW Act, in the manner I have set out above, I must make the single interest authorisation as sought. The authorisation will come into operation from the date of this decision, which is 13 November 2009.

[30] An order providing for the authorisation in the terms discussed above will issue along with this decision.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Schedule 1 – List of Franchisees

    1. Trew Pizzas Pty Ltd
    2. Whono’s Pty Ltd
    3. Perfect 10 Pizza Company Pty Ltd
    4. Razielle Pty Ltd
    5. Sormil Pty Ltd and BJ Marquez Pty Ltd
    6. Mickyboy Enterprises Pty Ltd ATF the Piatek Trust, Hobo Enterprises Pty Ltd ATF the Graham Trust and Fingy Pty Ltd ATF the Fing Trust
    7. Delrich View Pty Ltd ATF the Geoff Gleeson Family Trust
    8. A Burt Investments Pty Ltd
    9. Seagan Pty Ltd
    10. Unleashed Potential Pty Ltd
    11. High Five Pizza ATF the Moore Family Trust
    12. Tallantey Pty Ltd ATF the Tallantey Unit Trust
    13. G S N C Enterprises Pty Ltd
    14. Pizza Dispatch Pty Ltd
    15. SCP Pizza Company Pty Ltd
    16. Pizza Pro Pty Ltd
    17. Antecello Pty Ltd ATF the Antecello Discretionary Trust
    18. Yum Yum Pizza Pty Ltd
    19. Whak Enterprises Pty Ltd
    20. Kanji Pty Ltd
    21. Pye Holdings Pty Ltd
    22. Wilbe Pty Ltd
    23. Pye Pye Pty Ltd ATFT Holmes Family Trust
    24. Janchiri Pty Ltd
    25. Doughmaker (Toormina) Pty Ltd
    26. TCF Pizza’s Pty Ltd
    27. Zeal Bhatia Pty Ltd ATF the Bhatia Family Trust
    28. East Coast Foods Pty Ltd ATF the Rowe Family Trust
    29. Vanitas Pty Ltd ATF the Eternita Trust
    30. Pad & Sons Pty Ltd ATF the Asel Family Trust
    31. Rozelle N Holdings Pty Ltd
    32. J.M.S. Pizza Pty Ltd
    33. Grosscorp Pty Ltd
    34. Shree Swaminarayan Pty Ltd
    35. Fastlane Management Pty Ltd
    36. Austotal Enterprise Partners Pty Ltd ATF the Bachu Family Trust
    37. Shreenathji Pty Ltd
    38. Damtel Pty Ltd
    39. KACSPI Pty Ltd
    40. Platinum Pizza Pty Ltd ATFT Hornsby Trust
    41. Patel Brothers Restaurants Pty Ltd
    42. Cultura Pty Ltd ATF the Etruscan Trust
    43. Western Sydney Pizza Pty Ltd ATFT WSP Unit Trust
    44. Pizza Maniacs Pty Ltd
    45. Diamond Pizza Pty Ltd ATFT Diamond Pizza Unit Trust
    46. OPM Services Pty Ltd
    47. TPDP Pty Ltd ATF the Villawood Unit Trust
    48. Azady Pty Ltd
    49. RAWF Pty Ltd
    50. Felice Group Pty Ltd
    51. Fastlane Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the Pizza First Unit Trust
    52. Liberta Enterprises Pty Ltd ATF the Leva Trust
    53. TPDR Pty Ltd ATF the Steven Yeung Family Trust
    54. Versacorp Enterprise Pty Ltd ATFT Lee & Tu Family Trust
    55. Forest Pizza Pty Ltd
    56. Guruom Australia Pty Ltd
    57. Newcastle City Pizza Pty Ltd ATFT Newcastle City Unit Trust
    58. Blacktown Pizza Pty Ltd ATFT Blacktown Pizza Unit Trust
    59. Mount Pritchard Pizza Pty Ltd ATFT Mount Pritchard Unit Trust
    60. Dharti Ind-Aus Business Pty Ltd
    61. Able Service Pty Ltd
    62. Omkar Holding Pty Ltd
    63. Transcendgroup Pty Ltd
    64. Pissa Pty Ltd
    65. Neblar Pty Ltd
    66. Hobes Pty Ltd ATF the Graham No 2 Trust, Rybash Pty Ltd ATF the Piatek No 2 Trust and Fingy No 2 Pty Ltd ATF the Fing No 2 Trust
    67. DJM Enterprises (ACT) Pty Ltd
    68. 5 On The Side Pty Ltd ATF the Sickinger Family Trust
    69. Kimax Investments Pty Ltd
    70. Mickyboy Enterprises Pty Ltd ATF the Piatek Trust, Hobo Enterprises Pty Ltd ATF the Graham Trust and Fingy Pty Ltd ATF the Fing Trust
    71. PAAB Pizza Pty Ltd
    72. Pizza Perfection Pty Ltd
    73. Tong & Lok Investments Pty Ltd ATF the Tong Lok Family Trust
    74. Burness Foods Pty Ltd ATF the Burness Family Trust No 1
    75. JC Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd
    76. Top Gear Pizza Pty Ltd
    77. JAVB Pty Ltd
    78. Verrall Pty Ltd
    79. Bayside Pizza (QLD) Pty Ltd
    80. Wooden Enterprises Pty Ltd ATF the A Wood Family Trust
    81. Double Plus Pty Ltd
    82. Street Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the Street Pizza Trust
    83. High Energy Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the High Energy Pizza Trust
    84. CL MJ’s Pty Ltd ATF the CL MJ’s Family Trust
    85. N & NVJ’s Pty Ltd
    86. Delisi Pty Ltd
    87. K & M Lacey Enterprises Pty Ltd
    88. Younger Services Pty Ltd
    89. Burrow Pty Ltd ATF the Burrow Family Trust
    90. Brocklesby Pty Ltd ATF the Brocklesby Family Trust
    91. BCM Sheppard Pty Ltd ATF the B & M Sheppard Family Trust
    92. Dominord Pty Ltd
    93. Zoron2 Pty Ltd
    94. Lynch Investments Pty Ltd ATF the Lynch Family Trust
    95. Mitchell Ross Pty Ltd
    96. B G Roth Pty Ltd ATF the Nicho Family Trust
    97. Cotter Enterprises Pty Ltd
    98. Fun Time Pizza Pty Ltd
    99. TPAC Pizza Pty Ltd
    100. Gilbridge Pty Ltd ATF the Gilbridge Trust
    101. Southside Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the Mark Coyle Family Trust
    102. B-B & B Pty Ltd
    103. Jamestelle Consolidated Holdings Pty Ltd
    104. R. & T. Wells Pty Ltd
    105. High Five Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the Moore Family Trust
    106. Jam Pizza Pty Ltd
    107. Down South Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the Cottrell Family Trust
    108. Altam Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the Vreeken Family Trust
    109. Pizza West Pty Ltd ATFT Going Fishing Trust
    110. Surfwest Holdings Pty Ltd
    111. Natcliff Investments Pty Ltd ATF the White Investment Trust
    112. Xtreme GML Pty Ltd
    113. Gohard WA Pty Ltd ATF the Nils David Gornall Family Trust and Mutley’s Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the Matt Varis Family Trust
    114. Team Western Australia Pty Ltd ATFT White Family Trust
    115. GAAT Group Pty Ltd ATF the GNT Trust
    116. Kando Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the Hardy Family Trust
    117. Bansal Australasia Pty Ltd
    118. Alnas Holdings Pty Ltd
    119. Fortune Tree Pty Ltd ATF the Circle Eight Family Trust
    120. HG First Pty Ltd ATFT HG First Investment Trust
    121. LSM Pizza Pty Ltd ATF the Simon Carey Investment Trust and Lloyd Mitchell Family Trust
    122. Tarrod Enterprises Pty Ltd
    123. Fifth Generation Pty Ltd ATFT Watson Family Trust
    124. A to Z Via K Pty Ltd ATF the A to Z Via K Family Trust
    125. Golden Opportunities (WA) Pty Ltd ATF the A & N Nascimento Family Trust
    126. Jandapizza Pty Ltd ATFT Munro Family Trust
    127. A.B.A. (Amazing Beauty Australasia) Pty Ltd
    128. LP & BR Dale Pty Ltd
    129. Unleashed Potential Pty Ltd
    130. Trew Pizzas Pty Ltd
    131. Pye Pye Pty Ltd ATFT Holmes Family Trust
    132. Gurm Brothers Pty Ltd ATFT Gurm Family Trust
    133. M & B Management Pty Ltd
    134. Surfdale Pty Ltd ATFT Narre Warren Trust
    135. MTD Fun Foods Pty Ltd ATFT Wane Family Trust
    136. Melton Foods Pty Ltd
    137. Chilled Fresh Express Pty Ltd
    138. Kat Attack Pty Ltd
    139. Five Star Pizza Pty Ltd
    140. Bentleigh Foods Pty Ltd
    141. Less Conversation Pty Ltd ATF the Moir (Aust) Family Trust
    142. Noble Park Foods Pty Ltd
    143. Black Kat Enterprises Pty Ltd
    144. Radley Holdings Pty Ltd
    145. Preston Foods Pty Ltd
    146. Tiwal Pty Ltd ATF the Walsh Family Trust


    147. GR Pizza Pty Ltd
    148. RS Enterprises Australia Pty Ltd
    149. Seabrook Foods Pty Ltd
    150. Rising Dough Pty Ltd
    151. TPIM Pty Ltd
    152. Puff Pizza Pty Ltd
    153. Sarah Kate Investments Pty Ltd ATFT Sarah Kate Family Trust
    154. A.C.N. 070 568 240 Pty Ltd ATFT S & W Whitechurch Family Trust
    155. Pizzaaye Pty Ltd ATF the Woodward Family Trust
    156. Millions of Dots Pty Ltd ATF the Admonos Unit Trust

 1   s.248(2)(a) of the Act

 2   s.248(2)(b) of the Act

 3   s.248(2)(c) of the Act

 4   s.249(1)(a) of the Act




Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code {A}, PR989653>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0