Domast Pty Ltd T/A The Basin Haircutters

Case

[2015] FWCA 3581

28 MAY 2015

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2015] FWCA 3581
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Domast Pty Ltd T/A The Basin Haircutters
(AG2015/644)

BASIN HAIRCUTTERS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Hair and Beauty

COMMISSIONER BULL

SYDNEY, 28 MAY 2015

Application for approval of the Basin Haircutters Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1] An application has been made for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Basin Haircutters Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] On 20 May 2015, the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) wrote to the applicant and the employee representative with respect to the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) and the loaded hourly rate of pay under the Agreement.

NERR

[3] With respect to the NERR, the Commission noted that the submitted NERR, at paragraph one (1) did not contain the correct title of the Agreement, citing “The Basin Haircutters Enterprise Agreement 2014” as opposed to “The Basin Haircutters Enterprise Agreement 2015”. Schedule 2.1 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (the Regulations) prescribes that the correct name of the title is required for the NERR to be a valid notice for the purposes of s.173(1) and s.182(2) of the Act.

[4] The applicant submitted that the discrepancy in the title of the Agreement present in the NERR is the result of the passing of time between the initial NERR which was issued in 25 August 2014 and the subsequent finalisation of the bargaining process in March 2015. The applicant further iterated that the enterprise bargaining concluded in 2015 and that voting on the Agreement occurred in 2015.

Loaded Hourly Rate of Pay

[5] With respect to Annexure A of the Agreement - Classification Structure and Rate of Pay, the Commission noted that the loaded hourly rate of pay was inclusive of Saturday penalty loading and annual leave loading, which employees would otherwise be entitled to under the Hair and Beauty Industry Award 2010 (the Award) being the relevant award for the purpose of the better off overall test. I note that the Sunday penalty loading is line with the Award.

[6] The Commission requested the applicant provide a number of indicative rosters that included Saturday shifts for employees to demonstrate how employees would be better off under the Agreement in light of the loaded rates under the Agreement.

[7] The applicant submits that the higher hourly rate of pay under the Agreement adequately compensates for the loaded rates of pay and provided a number of indicative rosters to demonstrate this.

[8] Upon review of the rosters and correspondence provided by the applicant and employee representative, I am satisfied that employees would be better off under the Agreement.

[9] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[10] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with section 54(1), the Agreement will operate from 4 June 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 years from the date of approval.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE414092  PR567757>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0