DLJ16 v Minister for Immigration
[2018] FCCA 2576
•5 September 2018
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| DLJ16 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & ANOR | [2018] FCCA 2576 |
| Catchwords: MIGRATION – Application for administrative review of decision – where applicant had notice of hearing – where applicant failed to appear at hearing – application dismissed. |
| Applicant: | DLJ16 |
| First Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| Second Respondent: | IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY |
| File Number: | BRG 1067 of 2016 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Egan |
| Hearing date: | 5 September 2018 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 5 September 2018 |
| Delivered at: | Brisbane |
| Delivered on: | 5 September 2018 |
REPRESENTATION
| Applicant: | No appearance |
| Solicitors for the First Respondent: | Sparke Helmore Lawyers |
| Counsel for the First Respondent: | Mr Byrnes |
| Second Respondent: | Submitting appearance |
IT IS ORDERED ON A FINAL BASIS THAT:
The Application filed on 15 November 2016 be dismissed pursuant to Rule 13.03C (1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Rules 2001.
The Applicant pay the First Respondent’s costs fixed in the amount of seven thousand, four hundred and sixty-seven dollars ($7,467.00)
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
BRG 1067 of 2016
| DLJ16 |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
First Respondent
| ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Mr Byrnes of counsel appears today on behalf of the first respondent. The matter has been listed for final hearing before the court today. The matter was listed for hearing at 12 midday. It is now 1 pm on the day nominated for hearing. Mr Byrnes announced his appearance as counsel on behalf of the first respondent. The applicant was then called three times outside the court. It is clear that he is not in the precincts of the court and unable to attend.
I have been advised by Mr Byrnes that he has been instructed by his instructing solicitor that she telephoned the applicant at approximately 12 o’clock, at which time the applicant advised her that he was at Tweed Heads. Tweed Heads is a driving distance of approximately one and a half hours from Brisbane, depending on traffic. In all of the circumstances, the applicant has failed to appear and one can only proceed on the basis, therefore, that he has no further interest in pursuing his application for review.
Accordingly, his application is dismissed.
I certify that the preceding three (3) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Egan
Date: 24 September 2018
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Natural Justice
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Standing
0
0
0