DKH17
v
MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR
S186/2019
[2019] HCASL 284
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia (Farrell J). There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision. Accordingly, special leave to appeal should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
V.M Bell
11 September 2019S.J Gageler
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read DKH17; v; Minister for Home Affairs and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] HCASL 284
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court was required to address were whether the Federal Court's decision was correct and whether special leave to appeal should be granted. The court had to assess the correctness of the Federal Court's decision and determine if there were any compelling reasons for the High Court to hear the appeal. The applicant's appeal hinged on the belief that the Federal Court's decision was incorrect and warranted further scrutiny by a higher court.
In evaluating the application, the court found no reason to doubt the correctness of the Federal Court's decision. The reasoning behind the Federal Court's decision appeared sound and consistent with relevant legal principles. Consequently, the court concluded that special leave to appeal should be refused. Pursuant to the High Court Rules 2004, the Registrar was directed to draft, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application for special leave to appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.