DKH17; v; Minister for Home Affairs

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

DKH17

v

MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & ANOR

S186/2019

[2019] HCASL 284

  1. The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia (Farrell J). There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision. Accordingly, special leave to appeal should be refused.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

V.M Bell
11 September 2019
S.J Gageler
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read DKH17; v; Minister for Home Affairs and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] HCASL 284
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

DKH17, the applicant, applied for special leave to appeal against a decision made by the Federal Court of Australia. The matter in dispute involved the applicant's challenge to a decision made by the Minister for Home Affairs and others. The Federal Court, presided over by Justice Farrell, had already ruled on the case, and the applicant sought to appeal this decision to the High Court of Australia.

The primary legal issues the court was required to address were whether the Federal Court's decision was correct and whether special leave to appeal should be granted. The court had to assess the correctness of the Federal Court's decision and determine if there were any compelling reasons for the High Court to hear the appeal. The applicant's appeal hinged on the belief that the Federal Court's decision was incorrect and warranted further scrutiny by a higher court.

In evaluating the application, the court found no reason to doubt the correctness of the Federal Court's decision. The reasoning behind the Federal Court's decision appeared sound and consistent with relevant legal principles. Consequently, the court concluded that special leave to appeal should be refused. Pursuant to the High Court Rules 2004, the Registrar was directed to draft, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application for special leave to appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.