District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: DJA v R [2025] NSWDC 412 Hearing dates: 27 June 2025 Date of orders: 17 October 2025 Decision date: 17 October 2025 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Buscombe DCJ Decision: The Applicant is granted a certificate under s 2 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW).
Catchwords: CRIME – Costs – application for certificate under Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW)
Legislation Cited: Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW) ss 2, 3
Cases Cited: Category: Costs Parties: Crown: ODPP (NSW)
Accused: DJARepresentation: Crown: Mr R. Cooley, Crown Prosecutor
Solicitor: Office of Director of Public Prosecutions
Accused: Mr P. Pearsall, Public Defender
Solicitor: Ms L. De Luca
File Number(s): 2021/262811 Publication restriction: 1. Pursuant to s 578A(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), a person shall not publish any matter which identifies the complainant or any matter which is likely to lead to the identification of the complainant.
2. Pursuant to s 15A(1) of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), the name of the accused must not be published or broadcast in a way that connects the accused with the subject criminal proceedings.
JUDGMENT
Introduction
-
The Applicant DJA [1] , whom I will refer to in this judgment as A, stood trial before myself and a jury during the period 7 May 2025 and 27 May 2025 on an indictment which initially contained the following counts concerning allegations of a sexual nature against a single complainant, whom I will refer to as C:
1. DJA was a juvenile at the time of the alleged events. C was a child and a complainant. In the circumstances, I have used initials when referring to all witnesses.
Count 1 was an allegation that between 24 August 2000 and 24 August 2001 A assaulted C, a person then under the age of 10 years, namely, 9 years, and at the time of such assault committed an act of indecency on C;
Count 2 was an allegation that between 24 August 2001 and 24 August 2002, A assaulted C and committed an act of indecency on her in circumstances of aggravation, being that C was under 16 years of age, namely, 10 years;
Count 3 was an allegation that between 1 January 2002 and 3 December 2002 A assaulted C and committed an act of indecency on her, in circumstances of aggravation, being that at the time C was under 16 years, namely, 10 or 11 years;
Count 4 was an allegation that between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2003 A indecently assaulted C in circumstances of aggravation being that C was aged under 16 years, namely, 11 or 12 years;
Count 5 was an allegation that between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2003, A had sexual intercourse with C, a person above the age of 10 years and under the age of 16 years, namely, 11 or 12 years.
-
As opened to the jury, the…
Continue reading DJA v The King
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- DJA v The King [2025] NSWDC 412
- Case
- [2025] NSWDC 412
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether DJA had acted honestly and whether any conduct was vexatious, oppressive or abusive. The court found that DJA had acted honestly throughout the proceedings, and did not engage in conduct that was vexatious, oppressive or abusive. The court held that DJA was entitled to recover costs in full. The Attorney General’s opposition was dismissed.
The applicant was granted a certificate under s 2 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW). The court ordered that the applicant recover costs of the proceeding in the Supreme Court and the District Court.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Applicant is granted a certificate under s 2 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (NSW).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.