Dixon v Riquero
Case
•
[2004] FMCA 173
•29 March 2004
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Dixon v Riquero [2004] FMCA 173
[2004] FMCA 173
29 March 2004
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Dixon has brought an application against Riquero in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia seeking a declaration that the proceeds from the sale of a property at 1/45-47 Bartlet St, Canley Vale vest in the applicant pursuant to the Bankruptcy Act. The respondents are contesting the application. The dispute centres around the ownership of the proceeds from the sale of the property, which is currently held in trust by Messrs D. La Rosa Izzo & Co. The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Bankruptcy Act applied in a way that entitled the applicant to the proceeds of sale. The court held that the Bankruptcy Act applied to the proceeds of sale, and that they were assets of the bankrupt estate, which vested in the applicant. As such, the court made an order that the proceeds vest in the applicant and that the respondents pay the proceeds to the applicant forthwith. The court also ordered that the respondents pay the applicant’s costs in accordance with the Federal Court Act and Rules.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Bankruptcy Law
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Declaratory Relief
-
Specific Performance
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Dixon v Riquero [2004] FMCA 173
Most Recent Citation
Jess v McNiven, in the matter of McNiven (No 2) [2022] FCA 446
Cases Citing This Decision
8
Soutar Accountants Pty Ltd v Combis and Sijabat
[2019] FCCA 1766
Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Frederiksen
[2007] FMCA 1915
Jess v McNiven, in the matter of McNiven (No 2)
[2022] FCA 446
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
0
Metherell v Public Trustee in its Capacity as Executor of the Estate of the late Patricia Helen Peek
[2010] WASC 205
Public Trustee of Queensland v Oliver
[2017] QCA 73
Hudson, Robert Jnr v Whalan, Stephen William Michael
[1998] FCA 1064