Director of Public Prosecutions v Woo
[2016] VCC 244
•7 March 2016
| Revised Not Restricted Suitable for Publication |
AT MELBOURNE
CRIMINAL JURISDICTIONCR 15-02076
| DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS |
| v |
| STEPHEN WOO |
---
| JUDGE: | HIS HONOUR JUDGE HOWARD |
| WHERE HELD: | Melbourne |
| DATE OF HEARING: | 7 March 2016 |
| DATE OF SENTENCE: | 7 March 2016 |
| CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | DPP v Woo |
| MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2016] VCC 244 |
REASONS FOR SENTENCE
---Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence following plea of guilty to dangerous driving causing serious injury – offender’s daughter suffered skull fracture and brain damage in collision after offender driver fell asleep – exceptional mitigating circumstances – CCO
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Director of Public Prosecutions | Mr D Porceddu | Office of Public Prosecutions |
| For the Offender | Ms M Tittensor | Stary Norton Halphen |
HIS HONOUR:
1Stephen Hubert Woo, you have pleaded guilty to one charge of dangerous driving causing serious injury, for which the maximum penalty is five years' imprisonment.
2I must sentence you now on behalf of the community.
Circumstances of offending
3The circumstances of your offending are set out in an agreed comprehensive prosecution outline (exhibit A), which was well-summarised by the prosecutor in court.
4Shortly after midnight on 3 December 2013, you were driving a Mazda utility on the Hume Highway heading towards Melbourne, just outside of Euroa. You had your 16 month old daughter, Sabella, in the front seat when, due to fatigue, you fell asleep. You ran off the road to the left side and collided with a tree on the passenger side of your vehicle. As a result, your daughter suffered serious injuries, including a number of facial bone and depressed skull fractures with large intracranial bleeding and a traumatic brain injury. She was in a life-threatening situation and intubated at the scene. She remained at the Royal Children's Hospital for just over a month before discharge. I will describe the post-operative difficulties shortly.
5At the time of the collision Sabella was sitting in an approved child seat with an appropriate harness to restrain her. You had purchased the motor vehicle four months earlier and had sought and obtained approval from the Road Traffic Authority in New South Wales, where you were living, to install a child seat in the utility. However, you had incorrectly installed the seat as it was not tethered to safe anchor points on the floor of the motor vehicle. Rather, the restraint belt attached to the seat was tied around the bench seat head rest and then along the back wall of the cabin onto some lightweight metal pieces installed by a previous owner to hold a tissue box, which were of insufficient strength to prevent the child seat from moving on impact. On collision, the child's seat was thrust forward and your daughter's head came into contact with the A pillar, which was forced rearward.
6Speaking more generally, it was a two lane divided highway you were travelling along. The weather conditions were mild and favourable for driving. There was good visibility. The road surface was dry. Traffic was minimal and you had your headlights on. Expert inspection of your vehicle did not reveal any mechanical fault that may have caused or contributed to the collision. As I have said, the collision was due to your fatigue resulting in you falling asleep.
7You were driving from your home in Brisbane to relocate for work with your wife and child in Melbourne. You were running a cake decorating business but had secured a position in Melbourne as a financial planner. Your wife was driving down in a separate hire vehicle. You both drove direct to Sydney, and having arrived there, you stopped to spend some time with your parents and to do some shopping. Whilst your family slept that night you stayed up packing your personal possessions and work items in your vehicle, and it appears you had no sleep whatsoever. You set out very early the next morning with your daughter in your vehicle and your wife in the other car. You kept together for some time but then you stopped to see various customers at various places along the way and your wife drove on to Melbourne. She was in Melbourne and advised of the collision after she arrived.
8On your way to Melbourne you stopped at about 9 pm for about 45 minutes at a roadside rest place and then, after driving for another hour and a quarter, you stopped at another rest place at around 11.50 pm for about an hour, where you had a sleep. You set off at 12.42 am and the collision happened a couple of minutes later.
9It is to be inferred that you woke up at the last moment as you veered off the side of the road, as you did attempt to brake but that was insufficient to stop the vehicle before you hit the tree, as I say, on the passenger side of your vehicle.
10Police investigators established that you had driven almost 800 kilometres from Sydney to the crash site with a total driving time of about 15 and a half hours. You had passed many resting spots and no less than 28 fatigue warning signs on your journey from Sydney to the place where you crashed.
11After the crash you were obviously traumatised. You struggled to get your daughter, who was still in her seat, out of the car. You were unable to do that. Some passing truck drivers assisted you. Apparently you were not injured in the incident. You told a police officer who attended the scene that you must have had what you described as a "microsleep". In a record of interview taken back at a police station a short time later you told the police the collision must have been the result of you falling asleep and perhaps due to a mechanical issue, but this latter explanation was disproved, as I have said, on inspection of the motor vehicle.
12Significantly, on testing of a voluntary urine sample given at the time of the record of interview, you were found to be negative for alcohol and drugs; a combination of factors which is so often present for significant motor vehicle incidents.
13A specialist physician from the Victorian Respiratory Support Service at Austin Hospital provided an opinion that your “single vehicle/run off the road” type of collision was consistent with a fatigue/drowsiness related crash.
Victim impact
14I will return now to the post-operative condition of your daughter as set out in the prosecution summary. The paediatrician from the Royal Children's Hospital who treated her noted that she had suffered;
"…a very serious and significant head injury and spinal injury. The injury has resulted in protracted impairment as evidenced by her lengthy stay in hospital and the fact that she is still experiencing the consequences of this injury in the form of delay in her language development, challenging behaviours and sleep disturbance and requires ongoing treatment and monitoring".
15Your daughter was discharged from the Royal Children's Hospital on 7 January 2014. I have received a number of medical reports as to her progress over time and also therapy support which she has received. They indicate that in general terms problems were arising with sleep, learning and development, her general behaviour and attention and concentration. The detail of all this is set out in those reports. It is not necessary for me to go to that detail at the moment. Dr Aaron Johnston, a consultant paediatrician, provided the most up to date report, dated 1 March 2016. He indicated "In review of Sabella I am pleased to say she has almost no gross (eg running, climbing, etc) physical limitations secondary to the accident nor does she have any ongoing medical requirements (eg need for regular medications, or restriction in her activities).”
16Dr Johnston did note however that Sabella does have some concerns with regards to her speech development, as well as some of her fine motor skills such as doing up buttons, dressing herself, using a spoon. She is accessing speech and occupational therapy to address these issues and is making good progress. He concluded, “She also appears to have some socialisation issues with regards to playing with other children, interacting with her family or in a clinic appointment, though the underlying etiology of this is difficult to deduce, as it may be related to her delayed speech or could be a direct result of the injury, it is too difficult to say.”
17I note that your daughter was born prematurely at 28 weeks. I raised the issue as to whether or not her early birth may have been related to the onset of the developmental difficulties that I have identified. Your wife gave evidence, confirming the difficulties that your daughter has had following the motor car accident and particularly that, notwithstanding her premature birth, none of those difficulties were present in the child up to the time of the incident. Accordingly, I think it is fair to infer that the difficulties which she has experienced have been the direct result of the collision which you had.
Background and personal circumstances
18I will turn now to your background and personal circumstances. These have been set out helpfully in a good deal of material which your counsel has produced, which is more than adequately summarised, and summarised very well, in a comprehensive written plea outline provided by your counsel. It has made my task significantly easier by virtue of its contents, none of which are contested by the prosecution. It refers to a psychological report provided by consultant forensic psychologist Dr Aaron Cunningham, dated 1 March 2016, and also a report from your counselling psychologist, Nina Gruevski, dated 3 March 2016.
19Turning briefly to your background. You are one of two children born in Indonesia to parents of Chinese background. It is pleasing to note the presence of your parents in court and your brother, who, as I read the material, has had little contact with you over the years. They have come to court today to support you, along with your wife. The family came to Australia in 1989 when you were ten. You are now 36.
20It is significant, I think, that you were unable to speak any English when you arrived. In spite of that, you did learn the language well and achieved highly academically, having completed Year 12 at a high school in Sydney where your family had settled. Following that, you went to university and also the University of Technology at Sydney and obtained a bachelor's degree in business banking and finance. At one point you got a scholarship to go and work with a mid-tier accounting firm. You were then employed as an accountant for some three years and then went back and did some postgraduate studies in chartered accounting and financial planning, at which time you were awarded distinctions for academic merit. Following the attainment of those qualifications you have been fully and productively employed as an accountant or financial planner over a number of years in a number of places, including as a financial adviser at AMP in Sydney for about four years.
21You met your wife in Brisbane where you had gone to work and of that relationship there are two children, Sabella, who is now almost four, and another daughter who is almost two.
22I have mentioned you coming to Melbourne to work as a financial planner. When you did come to Melbourne you also were running a cake decorating business, which was your father's business originally. The work that you had in Melbourne did not eventuate for different reasons, partly bound up in the amount of time that you and your wife spent caring for your daughter, both visiting hospital daily and then looking after her once she was discharged. In October 2014 you returned to live in Brisbane and continue to run the family business. You have received some assistance from your mother-in-law with caring for the children. It is clear that you have spent a good deal of time worrying about and caring for Sabella's treatment and welfare and attended with her on a number of occasions for medical and other appointments.
23Sadly, your wife's brother, your brother-in-law, died suddenly in early 2015. He was aged 36 and apparently had a heart attack. He had five children and you and your wife have, in addition to caring for your own two children, taken one of those children to look after from time to time.
24In May last year your wife told you she had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer and had been given six to nine months to live. Your attempts to obtain medical confirmation of that situation were unsuccessful (due to her refusing such access) and she has apparently refused to undergo any treatment for that condition. In the absence of your other family members, she gave evidence before me today confirming the truth of that situation and explaining that she has felt unable to deal with the trauma of that diagnosis or the prognosis. It is a very difficult situation to understand and to grapple with, I am sure, for you, as it is for her, but for reasons that she obviously feels strongly about she has refused to undergo any treatment, even though some has been offered to her, not even to inquire about the results of recent blood testing in relation to the condition. She very frankly admitted that in doing that she understood she was possibly not offering herself the best opportunity to get better and hence be available to be a supportive mother for her two children. She might, when all this is over, re-think her position and approach it in a different way.
25It is not possible for me to reach a definitive conclusion about your wife’s condition because I do not have any medical material as to it, particularly nothing from the oncologist whom she identified as the doctor she attended and who has provided the diagnosis and prognosis.
26As to your daughter, your wife confirmed that she is now in day care for two days a week. She is separately receiving speech pathology and occupational therapy one other day a week. She has now - I am pleased to hear - been admitted to a special needs school and been undergoing positive experiences there. It is proposed that she have assessment by a neuropsychologist in the near future. There is a TAC case worker who manages the matter from Melbourne; she comes to Brisbane to see you once a year. Your wife said that your daughter has made a significant recovery from her original injuries and she attributes that in part to your dedication, and her own efforts as well.
Mitigating circumstances
27I will turn now to the mitigating circumstances which have, as I said, been well summed up in your counsel's written submission. The first is that you are a man of 36 years of age who has a very good character. You have never been in trouble with the law before and there is nothing since. I have received a bundle of six character references from industry associates, professional accounting colleagues and long term personal and family friends. In one way or another, they speak of your good character, of the enduring remorse that you have demonstrated in relation to this incident, significant self-blame for having caused the problem to your daughter, and the fact that you have carried the scar and trauma of this incident and will continue to do so for the rest of your life. They speak of your ongoing concern for your daughter and your other child. I have no doubt you are a devoted father and family provider, as they speak of you. You are described as a hard-working person, dedicated initially to your studies and then to your professional occupations, a friendly and responsible person with a very high work ethic. Significantly, they speak of you as being a careful driver, somebody who travels substantially as a travelling salesman in relation to the cake decorating business, and of the fact that you have never ever had a road traffic conviction, nor, it would appear, a serious accident of any kind. You are spoken of as an honest, kind, friendly and respected person and as having good prospects for rehabilitation; they are confident that you would not reoffend again.
28Next, I am satisfied that you cooperated with the police at the earliest time. You were not charged with this matter until June 2015, so there was a significant unexplained delay of a year and a half which must be in your favour, especially as there has been significant rehabilitation in the meantime. You entered your plea at the earliest possible time, which was at the committal in November last year.
29I accept that your moral culpability should not be put at the highest level in this situation because, as your counsel has argued, there was no speed, drugs or alcohol involved in the crash. Whilst clearly you had not done enough in terms of avoiding fatigue, you did take some steps to minimise that problem. As I have set out, and it is, I think, significant, you had been at a rest stop for about 50 minutes before you recommenced your journey. Obviously you simply did not spend long enough in that situation so that you were fit enough to continue to drive down to Melbourne.
30I accept also that there is profound remorse on your part. As your counsel has argued, you are consumed by the guilt of your daughter's injury and you are carrying the blame for that and have done so for many years now. As I have said, there is significant delay. You have had the matter hanging over your head now for two years and three months. I am satisfied that you are reminded on a daily basis about what you have done and you will have to carry the scar of this incident with you for the rest of your life.
31There is, I think, significant hardship facing you and your family in relation to the matter. I have described your wife's condition. You are going to have to carry the burden of that as well as everything else. You are also suffering from a major depressive disorder, which I think is probably the combination of all of these factors combined, although Dr Cunningham has said that you were predisposed to that or had that disorder before the accident. In any event, it is not disputed that if incarcerated it is likely that that condition would be aggravated, so proposition 6, if not 5 as well, of the Verdins principles is properly engaged in your favour. Obviously imprisonment ought to be treated as a last resort.
Other sentencing considerations
32There are other important sentencing considerations. The offending on your part is serious and there has been serious victim impact. The road trauma message in our community is loud and clear and, apart from any other thing that it talks about, it speaks frequently about the dangers of fatigue on the road, particularly the fact that drivers can suddenly fall asleep. Your case is a tragic example of road trauma as a result of a momentary lack of attention leading to you falling asleep.
33Every case has to turn on its own facts and circumstances and it is not really helpful to look at other cases because they are all different.
34I am satisfied that the combined effect of the mitigating circumstances warrants you avoiding the imposition of a gaol penalty. If your wife were to pass away in the near future, as is projected, then you would have the care and welfare of your family solely to carry. You are the principal breadwinner and I think also are making a significant contribution to the care and welfare of your family, including your wife's current difficulties.
35In those circumstances your counsel submitted that the appropriate course to adopt was to release you on a community correction order. The prosecution did not suggest otherwise, which is another way of saying that they were satisfied that such a disposition was within range in the circumstances of your case. I called for and have obtained a community correction order assessment report today and it indicates that you are considered as being a low risk of reoffending. I am satisfied that that is a proper assessment and that your prospects of rehabilitation are good.
36The assessment, however, is that you are unsuitable for a community correction order, but only because of the logistical difficulties anticipated in the order being made in Victoria when you now live in Brisbane with your family. It is accepted that it is not possible to release you on such an order with a community work component because that cannot be transferred to Queensland authorities. Nevertheless, it is possible to release you on supervision and mental health treatment and have that obligation transferred interstate to be administered by the equivalent authorities in Queensland.
37I note that the report says that you are required to travel overseas twice a year for two weeks on each occasion and that you would need to obtain the approval for such travel from the Victorian corrections office. But they are going to have to give you permission generally to go and live in Brisbane. So I do not think that there should be any prohibition on you going on such trips if they were genuine trips pursuant to a genuine business requirement. But that is something that you need to discuss with them. Arrangements have been made for you to attend at the Carlton Office of Corrections tomorrow afternoon at 4 pm and contact has already been made with the equivalent office in Brisbane, and the report notes that that office has confirmed that there would be no difficulties with accepting this informal interstate transfer as proposed.
38I was concerned that in the ordinary course, as part of the CCO, you should be given some community work as a punishment. That would ordinarily have been done if you were remaining in Victoria. That position has been covered satisfactorily in my view by you undertaking on oath that upon release on a CCO today that you would undertake to complete 100 hours of unpaid work with a registered charity in Queensland, and to notify the court within 30 days from today of the identity of that charity and the nature of the proposed work. And further, that upon completion of the 100 hours unpaid work, you will file with the court a statutory declaration confirming the completion by you of that work. I have accepted that undertaking on your part.
39Before turning to the details of the community correction order, I should say finally on behalf of the community, I denounce your offending.
Explanation of CCO
40Having received the report and indicating its contents to you, I am disposed to release you upon a CCO. That is a community-based sentence that addresses your particular offending and your personal circumstances and it is designed to both punish you and to assist in your rehabilitation. So it serves both your interests and those of the community, which is, of course, interested in your rehabilitation. If you engage with it appropriately it will improve your life and help those around you. So, in one sense, it is a golden opportunity for you in the face of a very serious situation here today.
41I propose to release you on the CCO but before doing that I need to explain what is involved and to obtain your informed consent. If you do not give me your informed consent then I cannot release you, I would have to deal with you in a different way which might place you in a worse position. One thing I want to ask you is whether you understand that you have a signed a form acknowledging that you may be called upon by Corrections Victoria to fund yourself some of the rehabilitation aspects that have been recommended for you. Do you understand that?
42OFFENDER: Yes.
43HIS HONOUR: All right. Just stand up, if you would, please. The CCO will last for 18 months and it will commence today. There will be both mandatory and special conditions. The mandatory terms, those are the compulsory ones, as I am sure you understand, that apply to all community correction orders are as follows.
(a) During the period of the order you must not commit, whether in or outside Victoria, and that includes Queensland of course, any offence punishable by imprisonment. There are many such offences, including driving offences. Indeed, this is one of them.
(b) You must comply with any obligation or requirement prescribed by the Sentencing Regulations 2011, particularly regulation 17.
(c) You must report to and receive visits from the Secretary of the Department of Justice or his or her delegate during the period the order is in force. When I refer to the Secretary or delegate, that means in practice a community corrections officer. Normally it is one in Victoria, but given the transfer of the order to Queensland, it will be the Queensland authority.
(d) You must report to the community corrections centre in Victoria specified in the order, which is in Carlton, within two clear working days. The appointment, as I said, has been made for you tomorrow at 4 o'clock and the details of that will be on the form provided to you.
(e) You must let the Secretary, that is, the community corrections officer, know within two clear working days of you changing your address or any job of any kind you may have, even if such a change is only temporary.
(f) You must not leave Victoria without first getting permission to do so from the Secretary, that is, the community corrections office in Victoria, either generally or in relation to a particular case. So, you are going to have to get a general authority to leave Victoria so you can go back home to live with your family and work there.
(g) Finally, you must comply with any direction given by the Secretary, that is, Corrections, whether oral or written, which is necessarily given to make sure that you comply with the order.
44As I have said, it is proposed that the management of the order be passed from Corrections Victoria to the equivalent authority in Queensland. So do you understand all of those mandatory or compulsory terms that apply to the proposed CCO?
45OFFENDER: I do.
46HIS HONOUR: And do you have any questions about any of them?
47OFFENDER: No.
48HIS HONOUR: As I said, there will also be certain conditions which are designed to punish you and to address the underlying causes of your offending, to provide treatment to you and to promote your rehabilitation, all of which is in your interests and those of the community. There will be no order as to unpaid community work under the order, but that is because I accept your undertaking to do 100 hours work with a registered charity in the terms and conditions that you have given this afternoon.
49I will order that you undertake mental health assessment and treatment and that may include psychological, neuropsychological, psychiatric or treatment in a hospital or a residential facility, particularly having regard to Dr Cunningham's diagnosis and recommendation for further support. You ought to continue the counselling sessions that you have started. I will not make it a condition of this order that that happen, but that is something you are going to have to discuss with the authorities in Queensland once you get back there.
50I will also order that you be under the supervision of a community correction officer. This supervision will assist you and may include your monitoring and management in Queensland, and it is going to continue for the whole of the 18 month period of the order. You should rely a lot on that person, who is there to assist you with your personal issues and problems. Do not bottle them up. If you are having a problem, please speak with that person about your problems. They are there to help you and you ought to work closely with them. It would make your life better and certainly the lives of others that you care about will be better as well.
51So do you understand each of those conditions that will apply to the proposed CCO?
52OFFENDER: Yes.
53HIS HONOUR: Next, I need to tell you about the consequences if during the course of the CCO you contravene the order. If you have done that without reasonable excuse, in certain circumstances you would face punishment of three months' imprisonment just for breaching the order. There are two ways to breach the order. The first is if you break the law, that is, you commit any offence for which you could be imprisoned during the time the order is in force. That would constitute a breach of the order.
54Even if you are not guilty of breaking the law but you fail to comply with the mandatory or compulsory terms of the order or any of the two conditions which I have explained, such as failing to attend supervision meetings or failing to comply with directions or programs concerning your mental health issues, then you would also be in breach of the CCO. That is sometimes called an administrative breach. So you can have a legal breach and an administrative breach.
55I should also tell you that if you breach the undertaking that you have given me, namely not to have completed the 100 hours work with a designated registered charity in Queensland and if you do not notify the court within 30 days and ultimately upon completion in the way you have undertaken, then you could be dealt with for a breach of the court undertaking which you have given. It would constitute a contempt of court. Do you understand?
56OFFENDER: Yes.
57HIS HONOUR: And for a contempt of court you could be fined or indeed even imprisoned. All right. I am returning now to your order, the CCO. In any circumstances where you were in breach of the CCO, you should expect to be brought back to this court and if that happens the court may vary the order, confirm the order originally made or cancel it if it is still in force and deal with you for the original offence for which the order was made, and that may involve a sentence of imprisonment. Or the court could simply cancel the order and take no further action. So do you understand the serious consequences of breaching the order?
58OFFENDER: Yes.
59HIS HONOUR: Do you understand that if you did that you could be sent to gaol?
60OFFENDER: Yes.
61HIS HONOUR: Do you have any questions about the proposed order that I have explained to you?
62OFFENDER: No.
63HIS HONOUR: Do you consent to the proposed order as I have explained it to you?
64OFFENDER: I do.
65HIS HONOUR: All right, thank you. Just have a seat. I will have the order drawn up and get you to sign that, thank you. All right. Ms Tittensor, would you mind taking that and having your client sign it, please, before I go to the formal orders.
66[CCO signed and acknowledged]
67I will sign that order, thank you. A copy may be made available to the parties.
Sentence
68Mr Woo, just stand up for the moment, please. The formal order is that on the charge of dangerous driving causing serious injury you will be convicted and released on a community correction order in the terms and conditions which I have set out, which you have agreed to and in accordance with the order which has been signed.
69Following that conviction there needs to be a mandatory cancellation of your licence, which results from the combination of s.87P(d) and s.89(1)(b) and (2)(a) of the Sentencing Act 1991. In short, you are disqualified for a period of 18 months from driving a motor vehicle on a road in Victoria. I note that you are not the holder of a Victorian driver's licence. The parties have conceded that, and I proceed on the basis that, that disqualification will only apply to you driving in Victoria and not driving outside of Victoria. So, you will be free to continue to drive outside of Victoria, particularly in the pursuit of your business, effectively as a travelling salesman in the cake decorating business. Obviously if you continue that business here in Victoria, you will not be able to drive in Victoria. If you were to do that you would be driving whilst disqualified and the penalty for driving whilst disqualified in Victoria is imprisonment. So you will have to consider what steps you can take if you want to continue your business in Victoria, for instance obtaining a driver to work for you when you are here. Otherwise you will not be able to work in Victoria for the next 18 months if your work involved driving here.
70The prosecution initially asked for a forensic sample order under 464ZF of the Crimes Act. That is conceded to be a discretionary matter. You have no convictions in the past and nothing subsequent. You have a good background. I accept your counsel's submission that I should exercise my discretion against making such an order. Accordingly, I make no such order.
71I ask counsel are there any technical aspects of the sentence that require attention?
72MR PORCEDDU: Not from this end, Your Honour.
73HIS HONOUR: Yes.
74MS TITTENSOR: No, Your Honour, only 6AAA.
75HIS HONOUR: Yes. I will do that in a moment. Is there anything else that you are asking for in terms of orders?
76MR PORCEDDU: No, Your Honour, that was it. Thank you.
77HIS HONOUR: Yes. Mr Woo, I am obliged to say what the sentence would be but for your plea of guilty. I think the features of your case highlight how artificial such a statement actually is and it is frankly almost impossible to decide what the penalty would have been had you pleaded not guilty to the charge, but it is likely that I would have imposed a term of imprisonment upon you. All right. Please sit down for the moment, thanks. Ms Tittensor, the order does not refer to the address in Brisbane that he has got to go to, but that address is contained within the assessment report which you have got a copy of.
78MS TITTENSOR: Yes, it's Logan, as I recall.
79HIS HONOUR: Yes. So can you follow that up, give the ‑ ‑ ‑
80MS TITTENSOR: I will.
81HIS HONOUR: Give the offender a copy of that report so he knows what the address is, but presumably they will tell him tomorrow.
82MS TITTENSOR: And I'll write it down for him, Your Honour.
83HIS HONOUR: All right, thank you. Thank you both for your assistance.
‑ ‑ ‑
3
0
0