Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Tulk (a pseudonym)

Director of Public Prosecutions v Tulk (a pseudonym)

Case [2022] VCC 2316

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Tulk (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 2316
Case: [2022] VCC 2316
Decision Date: 16 December 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Tulk (a pseudonym) [2022] VCC 2316

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Cheung v R [2021] NZCA 175
Citation 1

…C. Circumstances of the offending 10You fall to be sentenced on a basis consistent with the jury verdict at your trial, see Cheung v The Queen [2001] 209 CLR 1 at p9, paragraph 6. It follows that this effectively means that you are to be sentenced on the basis of the account of the complainant who gave evide…
Lugo v the Queen [2020] VSCA 75
Citation 2

…Cited: Cheung v R (2001) 209 CLR 1 [196]; R v Brown [2018] VSC742, Brown v R [2019] VSCA 286; Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120; Lugo (A Pseudonym) v R [2020] VSCA 75; Hoang Dung Tran v R [2011] VSCA 383; Ryan v R (2001) 206 CLR 267; R v Liddell [2000] VSCA 37; Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Afford […
Lugo (A Pseudonym) v R [2020] VSCA 7
Citation 3

…h the prescribed language and structure of the legislation”. 46I also refer to Lugo (a Pseudonym) v R [2020] VSCA 7, a Victorian Court of Appeal decision constituted by five judges. At paragraphs 25-26 the court stated: “For the reasons given by this court in Brown v The Queen [2019] VSCA 286, the comparative as…
Brown v the Queen [2019] VSCA 286
Citation 4

…Cases Cited: Cheung v R (2001) 209 CLR 1 [196]; R v Brown [2018] VSC742, Brown v R [2019] VSCA 286; Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120; Lugo (A Pseudonym) v R [2020] VSCA 75; Hoang Dung Tran v R [2011] VSCA 383; Ryan v R (2001) 206 CLR 267; R v Liddell [2000] VSCA 37; Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Aff…
Thomas v The Queen [2019] VSCA 223
Citation 5

…Cth) v Afford [2017] VSCA 201; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mobbs [2003] VSCA 148; R v Rau [2010] VSC 370; Tones v R [2017] VSCA 118; Thomas v R [2019] VSCA 223; R v Nikodjevic [2004] VSCA 222; R v Merrett; Piggott and Ferrari (2000) 14 VR 392; R v Miceli [1998] 4 VR 588; R v Idilo (unreported, Supreme Court…
DPP (Cth) v Afford [2017] VSCA 201
Citation 6

…5; Hoang Dung Tran v R [2011] VSCA 383; Ryan v R (2001) 206 CLR 267; R v Liddell [2000] VSCA 37; Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Afford [2017] VSCA 201; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mobbs [2003] VSCA 148; R v Rau [2010] VSC 370; Tones v R [2017] VSCA 118; Thomas v R [2019] VSCA 223; R v Nikodjev…
Tones v The Queen [2017] VSCA 118
Citation 7

…Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Afford [2017] VSCA 201; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mobbs [2003] VSCA 148; R v Rau [2010] VSC 370; Tones v R [2017] VSCA 118; Thomas v R [2019] VSCA 223; R v Nikodjevic [2004] VSCA 222; R v Merrett; Piggott and Ferrari (2000) 14 VR 392; R v Miceli [1998] 4 VR 588; R v Idilo…
The Queen v Putra Hendra [2014] ACTSC 102
Citation 8

…Cases Cited: Cheung v R (2001) 209 CLR 1 [196]; R v Brown [2018] VSC742, Brown v R [2019] VSCA 286; Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120; Lugo (A Pseudonym) v R [2020] VSCA 75; Hoang Dung Tran v R [2011] VSCA 383; Ryan v R (2001) 206 CLR 267; R v Liddell [2000] VSCA 37; Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Afford…
Tran v The Queen [2011] VSCA 383
Citation 9

…196]; R v Brown [2018] VSC742, Brown v R [2019] VSCA 286; Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120; Lugo (A Pseudonym) v R [2020] VSCA 75; Hoang Dung Tran v R [2011] VSCA 383; Ryan v R (2001) 206 CLR 267; R v Liddell [2000] VSCA 37; Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Afford [2017] VSCA 201; Director of Public Pr…
Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39
Citation 10

…the reasoning of Champion J in Brown (op cit) at first instance. Some assistance is also obtained from the High Court decision of Muldrock v R [2011] 244 CLR 120. 44I refer to the Court of Appeal decision in Brown (op cit) at paragraphs 4-7 where in the Court of Appeal stated : “For the most part the provision…
AED Oil Ltd v Puffin FPSO Ltd [2010] VSCA 37
Citation 11

…P v Mobbs [2003] VSCA 148 at paragraph [18]); (e) good character is also relevant to an offender's prospects of rehabilitation (see R v Raw [2010] VSCA 37 at paragraph [32]). 34I do take your good character into account and, bearing in mind that I consider the subject offending to be opportunistic, I consider suc…
R v Nikodjevic [2004] VSCA 222
Citation 12

…irector of Public Prosecutions v Mobbs [2003] VSCA 148; R v Rau [2010] VSC 370; Tones v R [2017] VSCA 118; Thomas v R [2019] VSCA 223; R v Nikodjevic [2004] VSCA 222; R v Merrett; Piggott and Ferrari (2000) 14 VR 392; R v Miceli [1998] 4 VR 588; R v Idilo (unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria Court of Appeal, Phi…
DPP v Mobbs; DPP v Elliott [2003] VSCA 148
Citation 13

…06 CLR 267; R v Liddell [2000] VSCA 37; Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Afford [2017] VSCA 201; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mobbs [2003] VSCA 148; R v Rau [2010] VSC 370; Tones v R [2017] VSCA 118; Thomas v R [2019] VSCA 223; R v Nikodjevic [2004] VSCA 222; R v Merrett; Piggott and Ferrari (200…
Cheung v The Queen [2001] HCA 67
Citation 14

…Cases Cited: Cheung v R (2001) 209 CLR 1 [196]; R v Brown [2018] VSC742, Brown v R [2019] VSCA 286; Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120; Lugo (A Pseudonym) v R [2020] VSCA 75; Hoang Dung Tran v R [2011] VSCA 383; Ryan v R (2001) 206 CLR 267; R v Liddell [2000] VSCA 37; Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Affo…
Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21
Citation 15

…742, Brown v R [2019] VSCA 286; Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120; Lugo (A Pseudonym) v R [2020] VSCA 75; Hoang Dung Tran v R [2011] VSCA 383; Ryan v R (2001) 206 CLR 267; R v Liddell [2000] VSCA 37; Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Afford [2017] VSCA 201; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mobbs [2003] VSC…
R v Brown [2018] VSC 742
Citation 16

…Sentencing Scheme has been applied by a number of judges in the County Court, it was first dealt with in the Supreme Court by Champion J in R v Brown [2018] VSC 742. That decision was appealed in Brown v R [2019] VSCA 286, where in a five-judge Bench of the Court of Appeal (consisting of Maxwell P, Priest, Kaye,…
R v Rau [2010] VSC 370
Citation 17

…2000] VSCA 37; Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) (Cth) v Afford [2017] VSCA 201; Director of Public Prosecutions v Mobbs [2003] VSCA 148; R v Rau [2010] VSC 370; Tones v R [2017] VSCA 118; Thomas v R [2019] VSCA 223; R v Nikodjevic [2004] VSCA 222; R v Merrett; Piggott and Ferrari (2000) 14 VR 392; R v Miceli…

AI Chat coming soon