Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Stephens

Director of Public Prosecutions v Stephens

Case [2023] VCC 1598

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Stephens [2023] VCC 1598
Case: [2023] VCC 1598
Decision Date: 1 September 2023

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Stephens [2023] VCC 1598

Most Recent Citation

Pihlgren v The King; Stephens v The King [2024] VSCA 47

Cases Citing This Decision

Pihlgren v The King; Stephens v The King [2024] VSCA 47
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…nded up on the ground. Mr Pihlgren intervened with the knife while Mr Stephens and Mr Kim were still grappling on the ground.[45] [45] DPP v Stephens [2023] VCC 1598 [7]–[9] (‘ Stephens Sentencing Remarks’).…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Director of Public Prosecutions v Silivaai [2023] VSCA 19
Citation 1

…our. Support for this view is found at paragraph 44 of the Bugmy [5] decision and explained in the relatively recent Victorian case of DPP v Silivaai [2023] VSCA 19. The recently provided case of Newton does not vary this observation. [5]See also Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38. 110Considering the apparen…
Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169
Citation 2

…A Crim R 468; Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; Boulton v The Queen [2014] 46 VR 308; Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169. Sentence: 5 years and 9 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3 years and 3 months imprisonment.…
Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38
Citation 3

…); Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) Cases Cited: Atholwood v The Queen (1999) 109 A Crim R 468; Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; Boulton v The Queen [2014] 46 VR 308; Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169. Sentence: 5 years and 9 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 3…
Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37
Citation 4

…y Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1958 (Vic); Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) Cases Cited: Atholwood v The Queen (1999) 109 A Crim R 468; Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; Boulton v The Queen [2014] 46 VR 308; Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169. Sentence: 5 years and 9 months im…
Atholwood v The Queen [1999] WASCA 256
Citation 5

…ect:CRIMINAL LAW Catchwords: Intentionally causing injury – Affray Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1958 (Vic); Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) Cases Cited: Atholwood v The Queen (1999) 109 A Crim R 468; Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37; Munda v Western Australia [2013] HCA 38; Boulton v The Queen [2014] 46 VR 308; Worboyes v The Queen…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Stephens&Anor [2020] VCC 626
Citation 6

…llowed up at the conclusion of the sentence he imposed. For reasons of which I am unaware, this does not seem to have occurred. [3]See DPP v Stephens [2020] VCC 626. 86In paragraph 16 of your counsel’s submissions, counsel sought to rely on the findings of Judge Lacava in relation to the recklessly cause injury m…

AI Chat coming soon