Director of Public Prosecutions v Seascape Constructions Pty Ltd

Case

[2020] VCC 86

14 February 2020

No judgment structure available for this case.
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA Revised
Not Restricted
Suitable for Publication

AT MELBOURNE
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION

CR-18-02476

DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
v
SEASCAPE CONSTRUCTIONS Pty Ltd

---

JUDGE: HER HONOUR JUDGE CANNON
WHERE HELD: Melbourne
DATE OF HEARING: 14 February 2020
DATE OF RULING 14 February 2020
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: DPP v Seascape Constructions Pty Ltd
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2020] VCC 86 Ruling No. 2

REASONS FOR RULING
---

Subject:  CRIMINAL LAW

Catchwords:  Pre-trial argument – Charges of failing to ensure persons other than employees were not exposed to risks - Elements of offence -  Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) s.23(1) - Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2017 (Vic) Reg 327(1)

Legislation Cited:               Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic); Occupational Health and Safety Regulations 2017 (Vic)

Legal Cases:Glenister v Wayne Home Earthmoving Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 390

Ruling:  Elements of the offence

---

APPEARANCES:

Counsel Solicitors
For the Office of Public Prosecutions Ms F. Todd with Mr N. Goodfellow Solicitor for Public Prosecutions
For the Accused Company Mr R. Andrew Ward Co Lawyers

HER HONOUR:

1.For the reasons set out by Ms Todd in her submissions yesterday and this morning, I am of the view that the draft elements set out by the prosecution are appropriate in this case and they are the elements that a jury ought be advised about.

2.In my view, the submissions made by Mr Andrew, although he has adopted the language of the relevant regulation - as Ms Todd has submitted - this may well lead to a situation where the very objectives of s.23 and more broadly the purpose of the Act, are completely denied and therefore, having regard to what the purposes of the Act are and the decision of His Honour Justice McDonald in Glenister V Wayne Home Earthmoving [2018] VSC 390 especially at paragraph 16, the draft elements that are set out by the prosecution seem to me to be entirely appropriate.