Legal Research
Cases
Director of Public Prosecutions v Sameri

Director of Public Prosecutions v Sameri

Case [2019] VCC 2218

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Director of Public Prosecutions v Sameri [2019] VCC 2218
Case: [2019] VCC 2218
Decision Date: 19 December 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Director of Public Prosecutions v Sameri [2019] VCC 2218

Most Recent Citation

Camin v The King [2024] VSCA 124

Cases Citing This Decision

Camin v The King [2024] VSCA 124
Citation 1 (Para 5)

…, reckless driving and filming.[10] [8] DPP v Holt [2021] VCC 1655; DPP v Lewis [2019] VCC 1174; DPP v McKernan [2019] VCC 1610; DPP v Sameri [2019] VCC 2218; DPP v Stevenson [2023] VCC 277; DPP v Ziro [2021] VCC 1187. [9][2021] VCC 1655. [10]Sentencing Reasons, [65]–[66].…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

DPP v Borg [2016] VSCA 53
Citation 1

…14In this state the Victorian Court of Appeal as recently as 2016 said in DPP v Borg [2016] VSCA 53 at paragraph 74, a case where the Director of Public Prosecutions appealed against a sentence where the offender had pleaded guilty to two charges of dangerous driving causing death and two charges of dangerous dri…
Konamala v The Queen [2016] VSCA 48
Citation 2

…lication the Minister has a residual discretion to cancel any decision to cancel a Visa. See generally the Court of Appeal decision in Konamala v R [2016] VSCA 48. 68I accept that upon completion of any sentence because of the provisions of the Migration Act, and subject to the discretion reposed in the Minister,…
DPP v Oates [2007] VSCA 59
Citation 3

…e is exceptional. See R v Neethling (2009) VR 466 , and the judgment of the Court of Appeal in New South Wales in R v Jurisic (supra). 16In R v Oates [2007] VSCA 59 the Victorian Court of Appeal emphasised that general deterrence must be given considerable weight in sentencing an offender for dangerous driving ca…
R v Whyte [2006] NSWCCA 75
Citation 4

…courts for some time. This is because that most precious of all things, namely human life itself is lost. 13The NSW Court of Appeal in R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252 published an amendment to its earlier guideline judgement in R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209. Speigelman CJ again repeated what he had said in Jurisic at…
The Queen v John Joseph Kurzynski [2001] ACTSC 90
Citation 5

…self is lost. 13The NSW Court of Appeal in R v Whyte (2002) 55 NSWLR 252 published an amendment to its earlier guideline judgement in R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 209. Speigelman CJ again repeated what he had said in Jurisic at p.284: 'A non-custodial sentence for an offence against s.52A should be exceptional and almo…

AI Chat coming soon